Sociology and Entrepreneurship: Concepts and Contributions

Sociological perspectives and research provide important and distinctive contributions to the understanding of entrepreneurship in three ways. The first is through the development of societal conceptions regarding productive activities that encompass the entrepreneurial role or function. The major alternatives emphasize socioeconomic systems as (a) moving toward an equilibrium (reflecting a broad consensus) or (b) reflecting the outcome of class competition (emphasizing conflict resolution). Both assume the inevitable dominance of massive productive organizations. These conceptions have recently been supplemented with attention to the dual nature of advanced economies or the benefits of flexible specialization. The second is through attention to specific societal characteristics affecting entrepreneurship: modernization; the role of the state in economic development; variations in the scope and nature of the unregistered (underground) economy; and the character of organizational populations and their ecological niche as they affect new firm foundings. The third is through attention to the impact of social context on the decisions of individuals to pursue entrepreneurial options. This includes attention to the individual's life course stage; social networks and embeddedness; ethnicity; and work experiences.

[1]  F. A. Fratoe.  A sociological analysis of minority business , 1986 .

[2]  Mark Granovetter,et al.  SMALL IS BOUNTIFUL: LABOR MARKETS AND ESTABLISHMENT SIZE* , 1984 .

[3]  S. Birley.  The Role of Networks in the Entrepreneurial Process , 1985 .

[4]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  New Venture Strategies in the Minicomputer Industry , 1987 .

[5]  Lynne G. Zucker,et al.  Combining Institutional Theory and Population Ecology: No Legitimacy, No History , 1989 .

[6]  E. Feige,et al.  The Underground Economies: Tax Evasion and Information Distortion. , 1989 .

[7]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Ethnicity and Entrepreneurship , 1990 .

[9]  Edna Bonacich,et al.  A Theory of Middleman Minorities , 1973 .

[10]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Charles F. Sabel,et al.  HISTORICAL ALTERNATIVES TO MASS PRODUCTION: POLITICS, MARKETS AND TECHNOLOGY IN NINETEEN-THCENTURY INDUSTRIALIZATION , 1985 .

[12]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  Theory and Research in Organizational Ecology , 1990 .

[13]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Using an Ecological Perspective to Study Organizational Founding Rates , 1990 .

[15]  A. O’Rand,et al.  CONCEPTS OF THE LIFE CYCLE: Their History, Meanings, and Uses in the Social Sciences , 1990 .

[16]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978-1988. , 1990 .

[17]  Linda Weiss.  Explaining the Underground Economy: State and Social Structure , 1987 .

[18]  R. C. Young,et al.  Is Population Ecology a Useful Paradigm for the Study of Organizations? , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.