Attitudinal Ambivalence, Rumination, and Forgiveness of Partner Transgressions in Marriage

Although positive and negative attitudes toward a transgressor are related to increased and decreased forgiveness, respectively, prior research has failed to investigate forgiveness among those who feel both positively and negatively toward a transgressor. Therefore, the authors examined such ambivalence and its relationship to forgiveness. It was hypothesized that spouses with ambivalent attitudes toward their partner will be less forgiving of a partner transgression because such an event is likely to prime the negative component of their ambivalence. Because ruminating about a transgression also has the potential to prime the negative component of one’s ambivalence, an interaction between rumination and ambivalence was predicted. Data from 87 married couples showed that greater attitudinal ambivalence toward the partner was associated with decreased forgiveness only when husbands and wives thought about the transgression frequently; ambivalence was not related to forgiveness in the absence of rumination. The implications of these findings for understanding forgiveness in marriage and for increasing forgiveness among married couples are discussed.

[1]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[2]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[3]  H. Locke,et al.  SHORT MARITAL ADJUSTMENT AND PREDICTION TESTS: THEIR RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY , 1959 .

[4]  K. Kaplan On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. , 1972 .

[5]  K. Dion,et al.  Physical attractiveness and evaluation of children's transgressions. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  M. G. Efran,et al.  The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. , 1974 .

[7]  M. Trainer Forgiveness : intrinsic, role-expected, expedient, in the context of divorce , 1981 .

[8]  J. Cooper,et al.  A New Look at Dissonance Theory , 1984 .

[9]  M. Zimmerman,et al.  A self-report scale to diagnose major depressive disorder. , 1986, Archives of general psychiatry.

[10]  Gian Vittorio Caprara,et al.  Indicators of aggression: The dissipation-rumination scale , 1986 .

[11]  Irwin Katz,et al.  Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. , 1988 .

[12]  L. King,et al.  Psychological, physical, and interpersonal correlates of emotional expressiveness, conflict, and control , 1991 .

[13]  Michele Killough Nelson A new theory of forgiveness , 1992 .

[14]  L. King Emotional Expression, Ambivalence Over Expression, and Marital Satisfaction , 1993 .

[15]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[16]  S. Nolen-Hoeksema,et al.  Ruminative coping with depressed mood following loss. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Steven J. Breckler,et al.  A Comparison of Numerical Indexes for Measuring Attitude Ambivalence , 1994 .

[18]  M. Zanna,et al.  Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. , 1995 .

[19]  Elizabeth A. Gassin Social cognition and forgiveness in adolescent romance: An intervention study. , 1995 .

[20]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Multi‐gallon blood donors: why do they give? , 1995, Transfusion.

[21]  G. Maio,et al.  The utility of open-ended measures to assess intergroup ambivalence , 1996 .

[22]  Bell,et al.  Ambivalence and Persuasion: The Processing of Messages about Immigrant Groups , 1996, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[23]  Multi‐gallon blood donors , 1996, Transfusion.

[24]  Multi-gallon blood donors. , 1996 .

[25]  E. Mullet,et al.  Forgiveness in adolescents, young, middle-aged, and older adults , 1997 .

[26]  M. Diehl,et al.  Effects of Attitudinal Ambivalence on Information Processing and Attitude-Intention Consistency☆ , 1997 .

[27]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[28]  V. Esses,et al.  Ambivalence and Response Amplification Toward Native Peoples1 , 1997 .

[29]  E. Worthington,et al.  Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  P. Glick,et al.  The Two Faces of Adam: Ambivalent Sexism and Polarized Attitudes Toward Women , 1997 .

[31]  R. al-Mabuk,et al.  Attribution Retraining in Forgiveness Therapy , 1998 .

[32]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Cross-Dimension Ambivalence toward Social Groups: Can Ambivalence Affect Intentions to Hire Feminists? , 1998 .

[33]  Steven J. Sandage,et al.  Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  David Trafimow,et al.  Some Tests of the Distinction between Cognitive and Affective Beliefs , 1998 .

[35]  E. Worthington,et al.  The psychology of unforgiveness and forgiveness and implications for clinical practice , 1999 .

[36]  K. Aquino,et al.  The Effects of Blame Attributions and Offender Likableness on Forgiveness and Revenge in the Workplace , 1999 .

[37]  Michael E. McCullough,et al.  Forgiveness as Human Strength: Theory, Measurement, and Links to Well-Being , 2000 .

[38]  F. Fincham,et al.  Attitudinal Ambivalence Toward Parents and Attachment Style , 2000 .

[39]  Joseph R. Cerami,et al.  Deterrence and competitive strategies: A new look at an old concept , 2000 .

[40]  F. Fincham The kiss of the porcupines: From attributing responsibility to forgiving , 2000 .

[41]  Michael E. McCullough,et al.  Forgiveness: Who Does It and How Do They Do It? , 2001 .

[42]  Frank D. Fincham,et al.  Forgiveness in marriage: The role of relationship quality, attributions, and empathy , 2002 .

[43]  F. Fincham FORGIVING IN CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS , 2005 .