Statin use in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care: cohort study and comparison of inclusion and outcome with patients in randomised trials

Abstract Objective To compare the social and demographic profiles of patients who receive statin treatment after myocardial infarction and patients included in randomised trials. To estimate the effect of statin use in community based patients on subsequent all cause mortality and cardiovascular recurrence, contrasting effects with trial patients. Design Observational cohort study using a record linkage database. Setting Tayside, Scotland (population size and characteristics: about 400 000, mixed urban and rural). Subjects 4892 patients were discharged from hospital after their first myocardial infarction between January 1993 and December 2001. 2463 (50.3%) were taking statins during an average follow-up of 3.7 years (3.1% in 1993 and 62.9% in 2001). Main outcome measures All cause mortality and recurrence of cardiovascular events. Results 319 deaths occurred in the statin treated group (age adjusted rate 4.1 per 100 person years, 95% confidence interval 3.2 to 4.9), and 1200 in the statin untreated group (12.7 per 100 person years, 11.1 to 14.3). More older people and women were represented in the population of patients treated with statins than among those recruited into clinical trials (mean age 67.8 v 59.8; women 39.6% v 16.9%, respectively). The effects of statins in routine clinical practice were consistent with, and similar to, those reported in clinical trials (adjusted hazard ratio for all cause mortality 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.80; adjusted hazard ratio for cardiovascular recurrence 0.82, 0.71 to 0.95). Conclusions The community effectiveness of statins in those groups that were not well represented in clinical trials was similar to the efficacy of statins in these trials.

[1]  T. MacDonald,et al.  The Tayside Medicines Monitoring Unit (MEMO) , 2007 .

[2]  V. Preedy,et al.  Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network , 2010 .

[3]  M Egger,et al.  The causes and effects of socio-demographic exclusions from clinical trials. , 2005, Health technology assessment.

[4]  J. Slattery,et al.  Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). 1994. , 1994, Atherosclerosis. Supplements.

[5]  P. Donnan,et al.  Optimal strategies for identifying patients with myocardial infarction in general practice. , 2003, Family practice.

[6]  N J Wald,et al.  A strategy to reduce cardiovascular disease by more than 80% , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  J. Hippisley-Cox,et al.  Cross sectional survey of effectiveness of lipid lowering drugs in reducing serum cholesterol concentration in patients in 17 general practices , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  F. Sullivan,et al.  Regional repositories, reintermediation and the new GMS contract: cardiovascular disease in Tayside. , 2003, Informatics in primary care.

[9]  P. Macfarlane,et al.  Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): a randomised controlled trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[10]  P. Thompson,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of left atrial thrombus , 2002, Heart.

[11]  AndrewJ. S. Coats MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20 536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebocontrolled trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[12]  Catherine Sudlow,et al.  Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  S. Yusuf MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Commentary , 2002 .

[14]  D. Wood,et al.  Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries , 2001, The Lancet.

[15]  A. Hartz,et al.  A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials , 2000, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  L. Smeeth,et al.  Commentary : DINS, PINS, and things-clinical and population perspectives on treatment effects , 2000 .

[17]  A. McMunn,et al.  Scottish Health Survey 1998 , 2000 .

[18]  Results of the low-dose (20 mg) pravastatin GISSI Prevenzione trial in 4271 patients with recent myocardial infarction: do stopped trials contribute to overall knowledge? GISSI Prevenzione Investigators (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico). , 2000, Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[19]  P. Macfarlane,et al.  The design of a prospective study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER). PROSPER Study Group. PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  R. Collins,et al.  Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  S. Gottlieb,et al.  Effect of beta-blockade on mortality among high-risk and low-risk patients after myocardial infarction. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  T. MacDonald,et al.  Association of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with continued exposure: cohort study , 1997, BMJ.

[23]  B. Davis,et al.  The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  A. Walker Confounding by indication. , 1996, Epidemiology.

[25]  Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) , 1994, The Lancet.

[26]  V. Carstairs,et al.  Deprivation and health in Scotland. , 1990, Health bulletin.