Evolutionary relatedness does not predict competition and co-occurrence in natural or experimental communities of green algae

The competition-relatedness hypothesis (CRH) predicts that the strength of competition is the strongest among closely related species and decreases as species become less related. This hypothesis is based on the assumption that common ancestry causes close relatives to share biological traits that lead to greater ecological similarity. Although intuitively appealing, the extent to which phylogeny can predict competition and co-occurrence among species has only recently been rigorously tested, with mixed results. When studies have failed to support the CRH, critics have pointed out at least three limitations: (i) the use of data poor phylogenies that provide inaccurate estimates of species relatedness, (ii) the use of inappropriate statistical models that fail to detect relationships between relatedness and species interactions amidst nonlinearities and heteroskedastic variances, and (iii) overly simplified laboratory conditions that fail to allow eco-evolutionary relationships to emerge. Here, we address these limitations and find they do not explain why evolutionary relatedness fails to predict the strength of species interactions or probabilities of coexistence among freshwater green algae. First, we construct a new data-rich, transcriptome-based phylogeny of common freshwater green algae that are commonly cultured and used for laboratory experiments. Using this new phylogeny, we re-analyse ecological data from three previously published laboratory experiments. After accounting for the possibility of nonlinearities and heterogeneity of variances across levels of relatedness, we find no relationship between phylogenetic distance and ecological traits. In addition, we show that communities of North American green algae are randomly composed with respect to their evolutionary relationships in 99% of 1077 lakes spanning the continental United States. Together, these analyses result in one of the most comprehensive case studies of how evolutionary history influences species interactions and community assembly in both natural and experimental systems. Our results challenge the generality of the CRH and suggest it may be time to re-evaluate the validity and assumptions of this hypothesis.

[1]  Peter B Adler,et al.  A niche for neutrality. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[2]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Phylogenetic diversity metrics for ecological communities: integrating species richness, abundance and evolutionary history. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[3]  Alexander Isaev,et al.  PyEvolve: a toolkit for statistical modelling of molecular evolution , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[4]  P. Chesson.  General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments. , 2000, Theoretical population biology.

[5]  Xuming Zhou,et al.  Phylogenomic analyses and improved resolution of Cetartiodactyla. , 2011, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[6]  J. Rougemont,et al.  A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. , 2008, Systematic biology.

[7]  Antagonistic interactions peak at intermediate genetic distance in clinical and laboratory strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2012, BMC Microbiology.

[8]  M. Lürling.  Phenotypic plasticity in the green algae Desmodesmus and Scenedesmus with special reference to the induction of defensive morphology , 2003 .

[9]  J. Cavender-Bares,et al.  The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[10]  Anton Nekrutenko,et al.  Manipulation of FASTQ data with Galaxy , 2010, Bioinform..

[11]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Mukesh Jain,et al.  NGS QC Toolkit: A Toolkit for Quality Control of Next Generation Sequencing Data , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  D. Faith.  Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity , 1992 .

[14]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Species co-existence and character divergence across carnivores. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[15]  P. Keddy,et al.  Does phylogenetic relatedness influence the strength of competition among vascular plants , 2008 .

[16]  Andrew Gonzalez,et al.  Are natural microcosms useful model systems for ecology? , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  C. Davis,et al.  Phylogenomics and a posteriori data partitioning resolve the Cretaceous angiosperm radiation Malpighiales , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Debashish Bhattacharya,et al.  A molecular timeline for the origin of photosynthetic eukaryotes. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[19]  Cyrille Violle,et al.  Phylogenetic limiting similarity and competitive exclusion. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[20]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylogenies and Community Ecology , 2002 .

[21]  Li Yu,et al.  Phylogenomic reconstruction of lactic acid bacteria: an update , 2011, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[22]  C. Darwin.  The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 2019 .

[23]  Stephen P Ellner,et al.  Cryptic Population Dynamics: Rapid Evolution Masks Trophic Interactions , 2007, PLoS biology.

[24]  N. Friedman,et al.  Trinity: reconstructing a full-length transcriptome without a genome from RNA-Seq data , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Evolutionary history and the strength of species interactions: testing the phylogenetic limiting similarity hypothesis. , 2014, Ecology.

[26]  L. Harmon,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF ECOMORPHOLOGICAL DIVERGENCE, COMMUNITY STRUCTURE, AND DIVERSIFICATION RATES IN DUSKY SALAMANDERS (PLETHODONTIDAE: DESMOGNATHUS) , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  P. Chesson.  Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[28]  B. Morgenstern,et al.  Improved Phylogenomic Taxon Sampling Noticeably Affects Nonbilaterian Relationships , 2010, Molecular biology and evolution.

[29]  S. Ellner,et al.  Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator–prey system , 2003, Nature.

[30]  David Q. Matus,et al.  Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life , 2008, Nature.

[31]  N. Cooper,et al.  A common tendency for phylogenetic overdispersion in mammalian assemblages , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Lin Jiang,et al.  An Experimental Test of Darwin’s Naturalization Hypothesis , 2010, The American Naturalist.

[33]  Corinne Da Silva,et al.  Phylogenomics Revives Traditional Views on Deep Animal Relationships , 2009, Current Biology.

[34]  J. Slingsby,et al.  Phylogenetic relatedness limits co-occurrence at fine spatial scales: evidence from the schoenoid sedges (Cyperaceae: Schoeneae) of the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. , 2007, The American naturalist.

[35]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  The problem and promise of scale dependency in community phylogenetics. , 2006, Ecology.

[36]  Ingo Ebersberger,et al.  HaMStR: Profile hidden markov model based search for orthologs in ESTs , 2009, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[37]  H. Philippe,et al.  Resolving Difficult Phylogenetic Questions: Why More Sequences Are Not Enough , 2011, PLoS biology.

[38]  K. Kettenring,et al.  Application of genetic diversity–ecosystem function research to ecological restoration , 2014 .

[39]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology , 2010, Bioinform..

[40]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[41]  C. Wellman,et al.  Fragments of the earliest land plants , 2003, Nature.

[42]  M. Mayfield,et al.  Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[43]  J. Stachowicz,et al.  Trait vs. phylogenetic diversity as predictors of competition and community composition in herbivorous marine amphipods. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[44]  C. Darwin.  On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection: Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 2019 .

[45]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Phylogenetic relatedness and the determinants of competitive outcomes. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[46]  J. Shultz,et al.  Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences , 2010, Nature.

[47]  Daniel J. Blankenberg,et al.  Galaxy: a platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis. , 2005, Genome research.

[48]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  The influence of phylogenetic relatedness on species interactions among freshwater green algae in a mesocosm experiment , 2014, Journal of Ecology.

[49]  J. Losos.  Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[50]  C. Delwiche,et al.  Broad Phylogenomic Sampling and the Sister Lineage of Land Plants , 2012, PloS one.

[51]  B. Cardinale,et al.  Is the relationship between algal diversity and biomass in North American lakes consistent with biodiversity experiments , 2014 .

[52]  Jeannine Cavender-Bares,et al.  Phylogenetic structure of Floridian plant communities depends on taxonomic and spatial scale. , 2006, Ecology.

[53]  David Posada,et al.  ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution , 2005, Bioinform..

[54]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Experimental evidence that evolutionary relatedness does not affect the ecological mechanisms of coexistence in freshwater green algae. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[55]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Phylotranscriptomics to bring the understudied into the fold: monophyletic ostracoda, fossil placement, and pancrustacean phylogeny. , 2013, Molecular biology and evolution.

[56]  J. Cavender-Bares,et al.  Phylogenetic Overdispersion in Floridian Oak Communities , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[57]  Stephen P Ellner,et al.  The functional genomics of an eco-evolutionary feedback loop: linking gene expression, trait evolution, and community dynamics. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[58]  W. Cornwell,et al.  Trees, branches and (square) roots: why evolutionary relatedness is not linearly related to functional distance , 2015 .

[59]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  Tadashi Fukami,et al.  Phylogenetic relatedness predicts priority effects in nectar yeast communities , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[61]  D. Coomes,et al.  Competitive interactions between forest trees are driven by species' trait hierarchy, not phylogenetic or functional similarity: implications for forest community assembly. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[62]  S. Ellner,et al.  Rapid contemporary evolution and clonal food web dynamics , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[63]  J. A. Bennett,et al.  Increased competition does not lead to increased phylogenetic overdispersion in a native grassland. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[64]  Petr Dostál.  Plant Competitive Interactions and Invasiveness: Searching for the Effects of Phylogenetic Relatedness and Origin on Competition Intensity , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[65]  William Chen,et al.  Osiris: accessible and reproducible phylogenetic and phylogenomic analyses within the Galaxy workflow management system , 2014, BMC Bioinformatics.

[66]  H. Philippe,et al.  Improvement of molecular phylogenetic inference and the phylogeny of Bilateria , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[67]  J. Klironomos,et al.  Influence of Phylogeny on Fungal Community Assembly and Ecosystem Functioning , 2007, Science.

[68]  W. Vyverman,et al.  Green algae in Lake Tanganyika: is morphological variation a response to seasonal changes? , 2007, Hydrobiologia.

[69]  Ladislav Hodač,et al.  Temperature-related phenotypic plasticity in the green microalga Micrasterias rotata , 2008 .

[70]  S. Kelly,et al.  Phylogenetic trees do not reliably predict feature diversity , 2014 .

[71]  Naiara Rodríguez-Ezpeleta,et al.  Detecting and overcoming systematic errors in genome-scale phylogenies. , 2007, Systematic biology.

[72]  Alison Scoville,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity facilitates recurrent rapid adaptation to introduced predators , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[73]  Susan G. Letcher.  Phylogenetic structure of angiosperm communities during tropical forest succession , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[74]  Yi Zheng,et al.  iAssembler: a package for de novo assembly of Roche-454/Sanger transcriptome sequences , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.