Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology

This paper first describes the recent development that scientists and engineers of many disciplines, countries, and institutions increasingly engage in nanoscale research at breathtaking speed. By co-author analysis of over 600 papers published in “nano journals” in 2002 and 2003, I investigate if this apparent concurrence is accompanied by new forms and degrees of multi- and interdisciplinarity as well as of institutional and geographic research collaboration. Based on a new visualization method, patterns of research collaboration are analyzed and compared with those of classical disciplinary research. I argue that current nanoscale research reveals no particular patterns and degrees of interdisciplinarity and that its apparent multidisciplinarity consists of different largely mono-disciplinary fields which are rather unrelated to each other and which hardly share more than the prefix “nano”.

[1]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  An indicator of cross-disciplinary research , 1985, Scientometrics.

[2]  Joachim Schummer,et al.  Chemical versus biological explanations: interdisciplinarity and reductionism in the 19th century life sciences. , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[3]  P. Stang,et al.  124 years of publishing original and primary chemical research: 135,149 publications, 573,453 pages, and a century of excellence. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[4]  Charles Sweet Nanotechnology in Japan , 1995 .

[5]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Nanoscience and nanotecnology on the balance , 1997, Scientometrics.

[6]  Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent,et al.  The construction of a discipline: Materials science in the United States , 2001 .

[7]  D. T. Tomov,et al.  Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science , 1996, Scientometrics.

[8]  R. Tijssen A quantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology: Co-classification analysis of energy research☆ , 1992 .

[9]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[10]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators , 2001, Scientometrics.

[11]  F. W. Lancaster,et al.  Types and Levels of Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research in the Sciences , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Ineke Malsch Nanotechnology in Europe: scientific trends and organizational dynamics , 1999 .

[13]  Martin S. Meyer,et al.  Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology:An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology , 2001, Scientometrics.

[14]  Olle Persson,et al.  Mapping excellence in nanotechnologies. Preparatory study for the European Commission, DG Research. , 2002 .

[15]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[16]  M. Meyer,et al.  Nanotechnology-interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application , 1998, Scientometrics.

[17]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Patent Citations in a Novel Field of Technology — What Can They Tell about Interactions between Emerging Communities of Science and Technology? , 2000, Scientometrics.

[18]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance , 2003 .

[19]  Liwen Qiu A study of interdisciplinary research collaboration , 1992 .