Prominent obstacles to lean

Purpose - This article aims to explore that despite the prominence of lean since 1990, there still exist ambiguous perceptions about the prominent obstacles preventing organisations either adopting lean or thwarting its wider implementation. Design/methodology/approach - A total of 68 UK manufacturing organisations operating lean were analysed in an effort to elucidate the factors contributing to the low numbers of successful lean conversions. Surveys were utilised as part of the research methodology supplemented with seven extensive case studies in a validating exercise. Findings - The prominent barriers are clearly identified in relation to the organisation's size, which should assist organisations about to embark upon their respective lean journeys. The preventative proposals should improve the implementation records. Research limitations/implications - The research focuses on manufacturing organisations in the UK, and should greatly benefit companies and managers in their respective lean endeavours. Practical implications - While the barriers were identified, their prominence and type varied amongst the sizes of the organisation. Equally, remedial strategies are proposed to improve the poor implementation record. Social implications - In the UK a successful implementation rate of less than 10 per cent is not beneficial for either employees or employers, and is accompanied by a poor use of the external and internal funding available to organisations embarking upon lean. Originality/value - The preventative strategies should greatly benefit lean managers and improve the poor implementation rates in the UK. Correlating the barriers encountered to the size of an organisation would aid this process.

[1]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota way : 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer , 2004 .

[2]  Dan Dimancescu The lean enterprise , 1997 .

[3]  J. W. Rogers,et al.  Implementing lean production systems: barriers to change , 2008 .

[4]  Suresh Garg,et al.  Development of index for measuring leanness: study of an Indian auto component industry , 2010 .

[5]  T. C. Bond,et al.  The role of performance measurement in continuous improvement , 1999 .

[6]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[7]  R. Kaplan,et al.  PUTTING THE BALANCED SCORECARD TO WORK , 1993 .

[8]  Rachna Shah,et al.  Defining and developing measures of lean production , 2007 .

[9]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Fuzzy logic based leanness assessment and its decision support system , 2011 .

[10]  John Bicheno,et al.  The Lean Toolbox , 1999 .

[11]  Gerard H. Gaynor,et al.  Handbook of Technology Management , 1996 .

[12]  D. Relles,et al.  Tools for intuition about sample selection bias and its correction , 1997 .

[13]  A. Shenhar,et al.  Beyond the Balanced Scorecard:: Refining the Search for Organizational Success Measures , 2003 .

[14]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[15]  S. Spear Learning to lead at Toyota. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[16]  Kay Carnes,et al.  Accounting for Lean Manufacturing: Another Missed Opportunity? , 2005 .

[17]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  Toyota Production System : Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[18]  José Luis Duarte Ribeiro,et al.  A framework for assessing the use of lean production practices in manufacturing cells , 2011 .