Towards a new reference ground motion prediction equation for Italy: update of the Sabetta–Pugliese (1996)

A revised Italian strong motion archive has become available since July 2007, including all the records of the strongest events occurred from 1972 to 2004. It contains the uncorrected and corrected accelerograms and the metadata relevant to seismic events, recording stations and instruments added after a careful revision. The availability of this archive allowed us to perform a first step towards an update of the reference ground motion prediction equations for Italy, which were evaluated by Sabetta and Pugliese in (Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:1491–1513, 1987), for peak ground acceleration and velocity, and subsequently extended to the 5% damped pseudovelocity response spectra in 1996. A subset with the 27 major earthquakes occurred in Italy from 1972 to 2002, in the magnitude range 4.6–6.9, was extracted and 235 good quality waveforms were selected, recorded at distances up to 183 km. The goodness of fit of the Sabetta and Pugliese (Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:337–352, 1996) model was explored using two independent statistical approaches (Spudich et al. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:1156–1170, 1999 and Scherbaum et al. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:2164–2185, 2004). The results obtained show that the Sabetta and Pugliese (Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:1491–1513, 1987) does not adequately fit the new strong-motion data set, for its small standard deviation and its non-zero bias. In particular, the most noteworthy result is that the Sabetta and Pugliese (Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:1491–1513, 1987) over-predicts peak ground acceleration and velocity at rock sites. New coefficients for the prediction of horizontal peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity and acceleration response spectra, adopting the same functional form in Sabetta and Pugliese (Bull Seismol Soc Am 77:1491–1513, 1987), were then evaluated in order to fit the new data set. This paper illustrates the steps made to update the existing ground motion prediction equations for Italy, discusses their limitations and provides the basis for future developments.

[1]  Laura Scognamiglio,et al.  Edge-Diffracted 1-Sec Surface Waves Observed in a Small-Size Intramountain Basin (Colfiorito, Central Italy) , 2001 .

[2]  Lucia Luzi,et al.  Site Response of Strong Motion Stations in the Umbria, Central Italy, Region , 2004 .

[3]  Ezio Faccioli,et al.  Treatment of ground-motion predictive relationships for the reference seismic hazard map of Italy , 2005 .

[4]  Giovanna Cultrera,et al.  Azimuth‐dependent amplification of weak and strong ground motions within a fault zone (Nocera Umbra, central Italy) , 2003 .

[5]  David M. Boore,et al.  SEA99: A Revised Ground-Motion Prediction Relation for Use in Extensional Tectonic Regimes , 2005 .

[6]  R. Basili,et al.  The Database of Individual Seismogenic Sources (DISS), version 3: Summarizing 20 years of research on Italy's earthquake geology , 2008 .

[7]  Eser Durukal,et al.  Empirical ground‐motion prediction equations for northwestern Turkey using the aftershocks of the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake , 2007 .

[8]  Lucia Luzi,et al.  ITACA (ITalian ACcelerometric Archive): A Web Portal for the Dissemination of Italian Strong-motion Data , 2008 .

[9]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  On the Use of Logic Trees for Ground-Motion Prediction Equations in Seismic-Hazard Analysis , 2005 .

[10]  Antonio Pugliese,et al.  Attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from italian strong-motion records , 1987 .

[11]  Giulio Selvaggi,et al.  CSI Catalogo della sismicità italiana 1981-2002, versione 1.1 , 2006 .

[12]  F. Sabetta,et al.  Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[13]  Paolo Gasperini,et al.  The new release of the database of Earthquake Mechanisms of the Mediterranean Area (EMMA Version 2) , 2004 .

[14]  J. Douglas On the regional dependence of earthquake response spectra , 2007 .

[15]  Lucia Luzi,et al.  Ground-Motion Predictions from Empirical Attenuation Relationships versus Recorded Data: The Case of the 1997–1998 Umbria-Marche, Central Italy, Strong-Motion Data Set , 2006 .

[16]  P. Gasperini,et al.  The Italian CMT dataset from 1977 to the present , 2006 .

[17]  L. Luzi,et al.  Ground motion models for the Molise region (Southern Italy) , 2008 .

[18]  F. Scherbaum,et al.  On the Use of Response Spectral-Reference Data for the Selection and Ranking of Ground-Motion Models for Seismic-Hazard Analysis in Regions of Moderate Seismicity: The Case of Rock Motion , 2004 .

[19]  N. A. Abrahamson,et al.  A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[20]  Francesca Pacor,et al.  Geotechnical Site Characterisation in the Umbria-Marche Area and Evaluation of Earthquake Site-Response , 2005 .