Social Technologies for Cross-Functional Product Development: SWOT Analysis and Implications

In product development, innovation means bringing together people with different expertise to develop breakthrough product and service offers. In spite of their potential, cross-functional efforts are not yet adequately supported from a knowledge perspective, asking for a more open and bottom-up approach for knowledge management. The paper aims to investigate how social technologies can enhance collaboration and knowledge sharing in complex, cross-functional and cross-organizational product development projects, highlighting the role of weak ties as enablers for more innovative design processes. Emerging from data collected in two case studies within the European aeronautical industry, it applies the Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) framework to highlight how wikis, blogs, forum or microblogs can shorten lead-time and increase the quality of early design decisions. Furthermore, it elaborates on how the design team can enhance its perception of the needs to be addressed and leverage its capability to develop solutions for the task at hand.

[1]  Terry Winograd.  (P)REVIEWDesign education for business and engineering management students: a new approach , 2008, INTR.

[2]  Jean Bilien,et al.  The CFM56 venture , 1989 .

[3]  Igor Hawryszkiewycz,et al.  Lightweight Technologies for Knowledge Based Collaborative Applications , 2007, The 9th IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology and The 4th IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce and E-Services (CEC-EEE 2007).

[4]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[5]  Francis D. Tuggle,et al.  Fostering innovation with KM 2.0 , 2010 .

[6]  Andrew McAfee,et al.  Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent collaboration , 2006, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[7]  James Surowiecki.  The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books. , 2004 .

[8]  Romaric Redon,et al.  VIVACE Context Based Search Platform , 2007, CONTEXT.

[9]  Jeffrey Y. Kim,et al.  Information–Communication Technologies Open up Innovation , 2009 .

[10]  Dennis A. Pitta,et al.  Online consumer communities and their value to new product developers , 2005 .

[11]  M. Fischetti.  Working knowledge. , 2003, Scientific American.

[12]  Nicolay Worren,et al.  When theories become tools: Toward a framework for pragmatic validity , 2002 .

[13]  Debbie Richards,et al.  A social software/Web 2.0 approach to collaborative knowledge engineering , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[14]  Marilyn M. Helms,et al.  Exploring SWOT analysis – where are we now? , 2010 .

[15]  David W. Pickton,et al.  What's swot in strategic analysis? , 1998 .

[17]  T S Baines,et al.  State-of-the-art in product-service systems , 2007 .

[18]  Åsa Ericson,et al.  A service perspective on product development : towards functional products , 2005 .

[19]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[20]  Steve Bell,et al.  Lean Enterprise Systems: Using IT for Continuous Improvement , 2005 .

[21]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  Albert Albers,et al.  COMBINING PROCESS MODEL AND SEMANTIC WIKI , 2010 .

[23]  Sotirios Paroutis,et al.  Determinants of knowledge sharing using Web 2.0 technologies , 2009, J. Knowl. Manag..

[24]  Albert Albers,et al.  Survey of Wikis as a Design Support Tool , 2009 .

[25]  Bill N. Schilit,et al.  Context-aware computing applications , 1994, Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[26]  Tobias Larsson,et al.  Development of product-service systems: challenges and opportunities for the manufacturing firm , 2009 .

[27]  Åsa Ericson,et al.  Engineering 2.0: Exploring Lightweight Technologies for the Virtual Enterprise , 2008, COOP.

[28]  Moria Levy,et al.  WEB 2.0 implications on knowledge management , 2009, J. Knowl. Manag..

[29]  Ansgar Scherp,et al.  Web 2.0 and Traditional Knowledge Management Processes , 2009, Wissensmanagement.

[30]  Richard W. Oliver.  Real Time Strategy: The Real‐Time Toolbox , 2000 .

[31]  A. Salter,et al.  Exploring the capital goods economy: complex product systems in the UK , 2004 .

[32]  Alexander Stocker,et al.  Enterprise Microblogging at Siemens, Building Technologies Division: A Descriptive Case Study , 2010 .

[33]  Shu-Hsien Liao,et al.  Knowledge management technologies and applications - literature review from 1995 to 2002 , 2003, Expert Syst. Appl..

[34]  Andreas Larsson,et al.  Engineering know-who : why social connectedness matters to global design teams , 2005 .

[35]  Andreas Paul Spee,et al.  Strategy tools as boundary objects , 2009 .

[36]  C. Meyer,et al.  Understanding customer experience. , 2007, Harvard business review.

[37]  Christian Wagner,et al.  Breaking the Knowledge Acquisition Bottleneck Through Conversational Knowledge Management , 2006, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[38]  David C. Wilson,et al.  Actionable Strategy Knowledge:: A Practice Perspective☆ , 2006 .

[39]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999 .

[40]  Georg Disterer,et al.  Individual and social barriers to knowledge transfer , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[41]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Enterprise Knowledge Management and Emerging Technologies , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[42]  Roy.  SWOT analysis : it ' s time for a product recall , 2022 .

[43]  Y. Barnard,et al.  Knowledge Management in engineering : supporting analysis and design processes in innovative industries , 2003 .

[44]  Dion Hinchcliffe.  Product Development 2.0 , 2007 .

[45]  G. Goldkuhl,et al.  CONTEXTUAL KNOWLEDGE ANALYSIS - UNDERSTANDING KNOWLEDGE AND ITS RELATIONS TO ACTION AND COMMUNICATION , 2001 .

[46]  Nils-Joar Høimyr,et al.  Wikis supporting PLM and Technical Documentation , 2007 .

[47]  Johann Füller,et al.  Community based innovation: How to integrate members of virtual communities into new product development , 2006, Electron. Commer. Res..

[48]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[49]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Crossing Boundaries: A Case Study of Employee Blogging , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[50]  Vlatko Čerić.  Building the Knowledge Economy , 2001 .

[51]  Erik Sundin,et al.  Integrated Product and Service Engineering - the IPSE project , 2006 .

[52]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Establishment of an Open, Wiki-Based Online Resource for Collaboration in the Field of Product Family Design , 2009 .

[53]  Fefie Dotsika,et al.  Knowledge sharing: developing from within , 2007 .

[54]  Hideo Shimazu,et al.  KM2.0: Business Knowledge Sharing in the Web 2.0 Age , 2007 .

[55]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Perspective: The Stage‐Gate® Idea‐to‐Launch Process—Update, What's New, and NexGen Systems* , 2008 .

[56]  R. Gulati,et al.  The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope , 1998 .

[57]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Agents that reduce work and information overload , 1994, CACM.

[58]  Walid Maalej,et al.  A Lightweight Approach for Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Software Teams , 2008, PAKM.

[59]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[60]  Paul Michael Di Gangi,et al.  Steal my idea! Organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of Dell IdeaStorm , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[61]  Miriam Cunningham,et al.  Building the knowledge economy : issues, applications, case studies , 2003 .