Subjective Quality Assessment of H.264/AVC Video Streaming with Packet Losses

Research in the field of video quality assessment relies on the availability of subjective scores, collected by means of experiments in which groups of people are asked to rate the quality of video sequences. The availability of subjective scores is fundamental to enable validation and comparative benchmarking of the objective algorithms that try to predict human perception of video quality by automatically analyzing the video sequences, in a way to support reproducible and reliable research results. In this paper, a publicly available database of subjective quality scores and corrupted video sequences is described. The scores refer to 156 sequences at CIF and 4CIF spatial resolutions, encoded with H.264/AVC and corrupted by simulating the transmission over an error-prone network. The subjective evaluation has been performed by 40 subjects at the premises of two academic institutions, in standard-compliant controlled environments. In order to support reproducible research in the field of full-reference, reduced-reference, and no-reference video quality assessment algorithms, both the uncompressed files and the H.264/AVC bitstreams, as well as the packet loss patterns, have been made available to the research community.

[1]  Rajiv Soundararajan,et al.  Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Video , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[2]  K. R. Rao,et al.  Digital Video Image Quality and Perceptual Coding (Signal Processing and Communications) , 2005 .

[3]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Søren Bech,et al.  Perceptual Audio Evaluation - Theory, Method and Application , 2006 .

[5]  S. Gary,et al.  Joint Model Reference Encoding Methods and Decoding Concealment Methods , 2003 .

[6]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Wireless Video Quality Assessment: A Study of Subjective Scores and Objective Algorithms , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[7]  E. Gilbert Capacity of a burst-noise channel , 1960 .

[8]  S. Tubaro,et al.  Subjective assessment of H.264/AVC video sequences transmitted over a noisy channel , 2009, 2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience.

[9]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  Digital Video Quality: Vision Models and Metrics , 2005 .

[10]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  No-reference image and video quality estimation: Applications and human-motivated design , 2010, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[11]  G. W. Snedecor Statistical Methods , 1964 .

[12]  Hong Ren Wu,et al.  Digital Video Image Quality and Perceptual Coding , 2005 .

[13]  Stefano Tubaro,et al.  A H.264/AVC video database for the evaluation of quality metrics , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[14]  T. Wiegand,et al.  Text Description of Joint Model Reference Encoding Methods and Decoding Concealment Methods , 2004 .

[15]  ITU-T Rec. P.910 (04/2008) Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications , 2009 .

[16]  Søren Bech,et al.  Perceptual Audio Evaluation-Theory, Method and Application: Bech/Perceptual Audio Evaluation-Theory, Method and Application , 2006 .

[17]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  The Evolution of Video Quality Measurement: From PSNR to Hybrid Metrics , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[18]  David C. Pheanis,et al.  QoS evaluation of sender-based loss-recovery techniques for VoIP , 2006, IEEE Network.