Competing associations in bacterial warfare with two toxins.

Simple combinations of common competitive mechanisms can easily result in cyclic competitive dominance relationships between species. The topological features of such competitive networks allow for complex spatial coexistence patterns. We investigate self-organization and coexistence in a lattice model, describing the spatial population dynamics of competing bacterial strains. With increasing diffusion rate the community of the nine possible toxicity/resistance types undergoes two phase transitions. Below a critical level of diffusion, the system exhibits expanding domains of three different defensive alliances, each consisting of three cyclically dominant species. Due to the neutral relationship between these alliances and the finite system size effect, ultimately only one of them remains. At large diffusion rates the system admits three coexisting domains, each containing mutually neutral species. Because of the cyclical dominance between these domains, a long term stable coexistence of all species is ensured. In the third phase at intermediate diffusion the spatial structure becomes even more complicated with domains of mutually neutral species persisting along the borders of defensive alliances. The study reveals that cyclic competitive relationships may produce a large variety of complex coexistence patterns, exhibiting common features of natural ecosystems, like hierarchical organization, phase transitions and sudden, large-scale fluctuations.

[1]  L. Buss,et al.  Competitive Networks: Nontransitive Competitive Relationships in Cryptic Coral Reef Environments , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Levin,et al.  Allelopathy in Spatially Distributed Populations , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  Paulien Hogeweg,et al.  Spiral wave structure in pre-biotic evolution: hypercycles stable against parasites , 1991 .

[4]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary games on graphs , 2006, cond-mat/0607344.

[5]  S. Levin Dispersion and Population Interactions , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Kei-ichi Tainaka,et al.  Paradoxical effect in a three-candidate voter model , 1993 .

[7]  G. Russ Overgrowth in a marine epifaumal community: Competitive hierarchies and competitive networks , 1982, Oecologia.

[8]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Allelopathy of bacteria in a lattice population: Competition between colicin-sensitive and colicin-producing strains , 1998, Evolutionary Ecology.

[9]  T. Czárán,et al.  Chemical warfare between microbes promotes biodiversity , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Kei-ichi Tainaka,et al.  Lattice Model for the Lotka-Volterra System , 1988 .

[11]  W. Godwin Article in Press , 2000 .

[12]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Cyclical interactions with alliance-specific heterogeneous invasion rates. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  M. Feldman,et al.  Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock–paper–scissors , 2002, Nature.

[14]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Competition by allelopathy proceeds in traveling waves: colicin-immune strain aids colicin-sensitive strain. , 2000, Theoretical population biology.

[15]  K. Foster Sociobiology: The Phoenix effect , 2006, Nature.

[16]  P Hogeweg,et al.  Colicin diversity: a result of eco-evolutionary dynamics. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  R. Durrett,et al.  Spatial aspects of interspecific competition. , 1998, Theoretical population biology.

[18]  Kei-ichi Tainaka,et al.  Physics and Ecology of Rock-Paper-Scissors Game , 2000, Computers and Games.

[19]  A. Watt,et al.  Pattern and process in the plant community , 1947 .

[20]  M. Gilpin Limit Cycles in Competition Communities , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[21]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[22]  G Szabó,et al.  Phase transition in a spatial Lotka-Volterra model. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  C. Johnson,et al.  Selection for restraint in competitive ability in spatial competition systems , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  L. Chao,et al.  Structured habitats and the evolution of anticompetitor toxins in bacteria. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  D. Tilman Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[26]  G Szabó,et al.  Defensive alliances in spatial models of cyclical population interactions. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  E. Hill Journal of Theoretical Biology , 1961, Nature.

[28]  Marcus Frean,et al.  Rock–scissors–paper and the survival of the weakest , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  György Szabó,et al.  Phase transition and selection in a four-species cyclic predator-prey model. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  Margaret A. Riley,et al.  Antibiotic-mediated antagonism leads to a bacterial game of rock–paper–scissors in vivo , 2004, Nature.

[31]  L. Buss,et al.  Competition within and between encrusting clonal invertebrates. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  M. Boerlijst,et al.  Selection at the level of the community: the importance of spatial structure , 2002 .

[33]  G. Szabó,et al.  Competing associations in six-species predator–prey models , 2004, q-bio/0408005.

[34]  R. May,et al.  Nonlinear Aspects of Competition Between Three Species , 1975 .