Protecting and restoring Europe's waters: An analysis of the future development needs of the Water Framework Directive.

The Water Framework Directive (WFD) is a pioneering piece of legislation that aims to protect and enhance aquatic ecosystems and promote sustainable water use across Europe. There is growing concern that the objective of good status, or higher, in all EU waters by 2027 is a long way from being achieved in many countries. Through questionnaire analysis of almost 100 experts, we provide recommendations to enhance WFD monitoring and assessment systems, improve programmes of measures and further integrate with other sectoral policies. Our analysis highlights that there is great potential to enhance assessment schemes through strategic design of monitoring networks and innovation, such as earth observation. New diagnostic tools that use existing WFD monitoring data, but incorporate novel statistical and trait-based approaches could be used more widely to diagnose the cause of deterioration under conditions of multiple pressures and deliver a hierarchy of solutions for more evidence-driven decisions in river basin management. There is also a growing recognition that measures undertaken in river basin management should deliver multiple benefits across sectors, such as reduced flood risk, and there needs to be robust demonstration studies that evaluate these. Continued efforts in 'mainstreaming' water policy into other policy sectors is clearly needed to deliver wider success with WFD goals, particularly with agricultural policy. Other key policy areas where a need for stronger integration with water policy was recognised included urban planning (waste water treatment), flooding, climate and energy (hydropower). Having a deadline for attaining the policy objective of good status is important, but even more essential is to have a permanent framework for river basin management that addresses the delays in implementation of measures. This requires a long-term perspective, far beyond the current deadline of 2027.

[1]  Alan Matthews,et al.  Greening agricultural payments in the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy , 2013 .

[2]  C. Feld,et al.  Diagnosing the causes of river deterioration using stressor-specific metrics. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  D. Griggs,et al.  Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals , 2016, Nature.

[4]  Sebastian Birk,et al.  Large-scale river restoration pays off: A case study of ecosystem service valuation for the Emscher restoration generation project , 2018 .

[5]  P. Quevauviller.  Adapting to climate change: reducing water-related risks in Europe – EU policy and research considerations , 2011 .

[6]  Christopher Spray,et al.  Water Ecosystem Services: Implementation of the European Water Framework Directive: what does taking an ecosystem services-based approach add? , 2015 .

[7]  I. Muxika,et al.  'The past is the future of the present': Learning from long-time series of marine monitoring. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[8]  Paula Antunes,et al.  Ecosystem services for water policy: insights across Europe , 2016 .

[9]  Á. Borja,et al.  Quantified biotic and abiotic responses to multiple stress in freshwater, marine and ground waters. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  M. Lago,et al.  Protecting and Restoring Biodiversity across the Freshwater, Coastal and Marine Realms: Is the existing EU policy framework fit for purpose? , 2018 .

[11]  Á. Borja,et al.  The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  A. Butturini,et al.  River ecosystem processes: A synthesis of approaches, criteria of use and sensitivity to environmental stressors. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  M. Palmer,et al.  River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: a failure of theory or practice? , 2010 .

[15]  D. Karthe,et al.  Is the EU WFD suitable to support IWRM planning in non-European countries? Lessons learnt from the introduction of IWRM and River Basin Management in Mongolia , 2017 .

[16]  Ioan Fazey,et al.  Knowledge needs for the operationalisation of the concept of ecosystem services , 2017 .

[17]  E. Milner‐Gulland,et al.  Status and Trends in Global Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital: Assessing Progress Toward Aichi Biodiversity Target 14 , 2016 .

[18]  S. Snapp,et al.  What is sustainable intensification? Views from experts , 2015 .

[19]  Roberto Danovaro,et al.  Implementing and Innovating Marine Monitoring Approaches for Assessing Marine Environmental Status , 2016, Front. Mar. Sci..

[20]  Kristian Meissner,et al.  Implementation options for DNA-based identification into ecological status assessment under the European Water Framework Directive. , 2018, Water research.

[21]  S. Larsen,et al.  The future of European water management: Demonstration of a new WFD compliant framework to support sustainable management under multiple stress. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  R. K. Johnson,et al.  Combination of multiple biological quality elements into waterbody assessment of surface waters , 2012, Hydrobiologia.

[23]  Teeb.  The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations , 2017 .

[24]  S. Hendry.  The eu Water Framework Directive – Challenges, Gaps and Potential for the Future , 2017 .

[25]  S. Schmutz,et al.  Configuration of multiple human stressors and their impacts on fish assemblages in Alpine river basins of Austria. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[26]  Jacob Carstensen,et al.  Marine management--towards an integrated implementation of the European Marine Strategy Framework and the Water Framework Directives. , 2010, Marine pollution bulletin.

[27]  Margaret Kosmala,et al.  Assessing data quality in citizen science (preprint) , 2016, bioRxiv.

[28]  Anne Lyche Solheim,et al.  Integrated assessment of ecological status and misclassification of lakes: The role of uncertainty and index combination rules , 2015 .

[29]  Chris Jordan,et al.  Evaluating impacts using a BACI design, ratios, and a Bayesian approach with a focus on restoration , 2016, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[30]  K. Blackstock,et al.  Operationalising sustainability science for a sustainability directive? Reflecting on three pilot projects , 2007 .

[31]  Á. Borja,et al.  The recovery of estuarine quality and the perceived increase of cultural ecosystem services by beach users: A case study from northern Spain. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[32]  A. Cardoso,et al.  Incorporating invasive alien species into ecological assessment in the context of the Water Framework Directive. , 2008 .

[33]  P. Boon,et al.  Is there a need for a more explicit accounting of invasive alien species under the Water Framework Directive , 2013 .

[34]  L. May,et al.  Water quality of Loch Leven: responses to enrichment, restoration and climate change , 2011, Hydrobiologia.

[35]  S Birk,et al.  Intercalibrating classifications of ecological status: Europe's quest for common management objectives for aquatic ecosystems. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[36]  Jun,et al.  The challenges of water, waste and climate change in cities , 2017, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[37]  G. Morabito,et al.  Strength and uncertainty of phytoplankton metrics for assessing eutrophication impacts in lakes , 2012, Hydrobiologia.

[38]  D. Huitema,et al.  Transforming European Water Governance? EU Water Framework Directive implementation in 13 member states , 2016 .

[39]  T. Christiansen,et al.  European waters assessment of status and pressures 2018. , 2012 .

[40]  J. Newig,et al.  Cross-level information and influence in mandated participatory planning: Alternative pathways to sustainable water management in Germany's implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive , 2014 .

[41]  S. Sabater,et al.  Longitudinal development of chlorophyll and phytoplankton assemblages in a regulated large river (the Ebro River). , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[42]  Other.  European waters assessment of status and pressures , 2012 .

[43]  A. Baattrup‐Pedersen,et al.  Functional trait composition of aquatic plants can serve to disentangle multiple interacting stressors in lowland streams. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[44]  W. Brack,et al.  A new risk assessment approach for the prioritization of 500 classical and emerging organic microcontaminants as potential river basin specific pollutants under the European Water Framework Directive. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[45]  C. Spray,et al.  Working across scales in integrated catchment management: lessons learned for adaptive water governance from regional experiences , 2017, Regional Environmental Change.

[46]  Mario Lepage,et al.  Restoring fish ecological quality in estuaries: Implication of interactive and cumulative effects among anthropogenic stressors. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[47]  Fabio Masi,et al.  Integrated valuation of a nature-based solution for water pollution control. Highlighting hidden benefits , 2016 .

[48]  S. Collins,et al.  Growth responses of a green alga to multiple environmental drivers , 2015 .

[49]  Craig R. Allen,et al.  FORUM: Effective management of ecological resilience – are we there yet? , 2015 .

[50]  B. Moss,et al.  The Water Framework Directive: total environment or political compromise? , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[51]  Arturo Elosegi,et al.  River doctors: Learning from medicine to improve ecosystem management. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[52]  Angel Borja,et al.  Problems associated with the 'one-out, all-out' principle, when using multiple ecosystem components in assessing the ecological status of marine waters. , 2010, Marine pollution bulletin.

[53]  A. Meiner,et al.  An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 , 2016 .

[54]  Linda May,et al.  Phosphorus legacy: overcoming the effects of past management practices to mitigate future water quality impairment. , 2013, Journal of environmental quality.

[55]  Steve Groom,et al.  Developments in Earth observation for the assessment and monitoring of inland, transitional, coastal and shelf-sea waters. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[56]  S. Loiselle,et al.  Getting the full picture: Assessing the complementarity of citizen science and agency monitoring data , 2017, PloS one.

[57]  Bill Slee,et al.  A review on cost-effectiveness analysis of agri-environmental measures related to the EU WFD: Key issues, methods, and applications , 2011 .

[58]  M. Kelly.  Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication: Building capacity to meet the challenges of the Water Framework Directive , 2014 .

[59]  Martin Kernan,et al.  Assessing the ecological status in the context of the European Water Framework Directive: where do we go now? , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[60]  Angel Borja,et al.  Marine monitoring during an economic crisis: the cure is worse than the disease. , 2013, Marine pollution bulletin.

[61]  A. Bailey.  The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. Edited by P. Kumar. London and Washington D.C.: Earthscan (2010), pp. 401, £49.99. ISBN 978-1-84971-212-5. , 2011, Experimental Agriculture.

[62]  Lidija Globevnik,et al.  Effects of multiple stressors on cyanobacteria abundance vary with lake type , 2018, Global change biology.

[63]  N Voulvoulis,et al.  The potential of using the Ecosystem Approach in the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[64]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world , 2013 .

[65]  L. Snoj,et al.  Metadata to the MARS spatial database , 2017 .

[66]  J. Shutler,et al.  Spatial assessment of intertidal seagrass meadows using optical imaging systems and a lightweight drone , 2018 .

[67]  I. Gunn,et al.  A meta-analysis of water quality and aquatic macrophyte responses in 18 lakes treated with lanthanum modified bentonite (Phoslock(®)). , 2016, Water research.

[68]  D. D. Vaus,et al.  Surveys in Social Research , 1991 .

[69]  David Hudson,et al.  Governing the UN sustainable development goals: interactions, infrastructures, and institutions. , 2015, The Lancet. Global health.

[70]  N. Prat,et al.  A biological tool to assess flow connectivity in reference temporary streams from the Mediterranean Basin. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[71]  M. Reed.  Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[72]  S. Schmutz,et al.  Untangling the effects of multiple human stressors and their impacts on fish assemblages in European running waters. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[73]  Murray A. Rudd,et al.  Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy , 2011 .

[74]  B. Jacobsen,et al.  Implementing the water framework directive in Denmark – Lessons on agricultural measures from a legal and regulatory perspective , 2017 .

[75]  N. Willby,et al.  Redundancy in the ecological assessment of lakes: Are phytoplankton, macrophytes and phytobenthos all necessary? , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[76]  S. Sabater,et al.  Multiple stressor effects on biological quality elements in the Ebro River: Present diagnosis and predicted responses. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[77]  S. Hellsten,et al.  Macrophyte responses to water level fluctuation in Fennoscandinavian Lakes — Applying a common index , 2009 .

[78]  Richard S. Quilliam,et al.  Managing Multiple Catchment Demands for Sustainable Water Use and Ecosystem Service Provision , 2017 .

[79]  Ana Cristina Cardoso,et al.  Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management , 2016 .

[80]  Á. Borja,et al.  A comparative review of recovery processes in rivers, lakes, estuarine and coastal waters , 2013, Hydrobiologia.

[81]  Annemarie P van Wezel,et al.  Towards the review of the European Union Water Framework Directive: Recommendations for more efficient assessment and management of chemical contamination in European surface water resources. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[82]  Á. Borja,et al.  Medium- and Long-term Recovery of Estuarine and Coastal Ecosystems: Patterns, Rates and Restoration Effectiveness , 2010 .

[83]  C. Townsend,et al.  Reconceptualizing synergism and antagonism among multiple stressors , 2015, Ecology and evolution.

[84]  Michael Elliott,et al.  Is existing legislation fit-for-purpose to achieve Good Environmental Status in European seas? , 2016, Marine pollution bulletin.

[85]  Nikolaos Voulvoulis,et al.  The EU Water Framework Directive: From great expectations to problems with implementation. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[86]  David Benson,et al.  Transforming European Water Governance? Participation and River Basin Management under the EU Water Framework Directive in 13 Member States , 2016 .

[87]  Anne Courrat,et al.  Three hundred ways to assess Europe's surface waters: An almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive , 2012 .

[88]  COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS , 2008 .

[89]  Helen E Roy,et al.  The diversity and evolution of ecological and environmental citizen science , 2017, PloS one.

[90]  S. Ormerod,et al.  Evaluating riparian solutions to multiple stressor problems in river ecosystems - A conceptual study. , 2018, Water research.

[91]  Pedro Beja,et al.  The future of biotic indices in the ecogenomic era: Integrating (e)DNA metabarcoding in biological assessment of aquatic ecosystems. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[92]  Anders L. Madsen,et al.  Operationalising ecosystem service assessment in Bayesian Belief Networks: experiences within the OpenNESS project , 2017 .