Can a Space-Perception Conflict Be Solved with Three Sense Modalities?

A cross-modal conflict over location was resolved in an unexpected way. When vision and proprioception provide conflicting information, which modality should dominate is ambiguous. A visual – proprioceptive conflict was created with a prism and, to logically disambiguate the problem, auditory information was added that either agreed with vision (group 1), agreed with proprioception (group 2), or was absent (group 3). While a scarcity of research addresses the interaction of three modalities, I predicted error should be attributed to the modality in the minority. Instead, the opposite was found: adaptation consisted of a large change in arm proprioception and a small change affecting vision in group 2, and the reverse in group 1. Group 1 was not different than group 3. Findings suggested adaptation to separate two-way conflicts, possibly influenced by direction of attention, rather than a direct solution to a three-way modality problem.

[1]  C. S. Harris Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision. , 1965, Psychological review.

[2]  M S Landy,et al.  Ideal cue combination for localizing texture-defined edges. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  R. J. van Beers,et al.  Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  F. Bedford Constraints on perceptual learning: objects and dimensions , 1995, Cognition.

[5]  I ROCK,et al.  Vision and Touch: An Experimentally Created Conflict between the Two Senses , 1964, Science.

[6]  Felice L. Bedford,et al.  Constraints on learning new mappings between perceptual dimensions , 1989 .

[7]  I. Rock,et al.  Vision and touch. , 1967, Scientific American.

[8]  L. K. Canon Intermodality inconsistency of input and directed attention as determinants of the nature of adaptation. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  M. Kubovy,et al.  Auditory and visual objects , 2001, Cognition.

[10]  Felice L. Bedford,et al.  Keeping perception accurate , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. , 1994 .

[12]  B Wallace,et al.  Effects on prism adaptation of duration and timing of visual feedback during pointing. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  D. Scott Perceptual learning. , 1974, Queen's nursing journal.

[14]  R. Held Plasticity in sensory-motor systems. , 1965, Scientific American.

[15]  H. Wallach,et al.  A PASSIVE CONDITION FOR RAPID ADAPTATION TO DISPLACED VISUAL DIRECTION. , 1963, The American journal of psychology.

[16]  Richard Held,et al.  Growth in head size during infancy: Implications for sound localization. , 1988 .

[17]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[18]  D. Boisson,et al.  Does Action Make the Link Between Number and Space Representation? , 2004, Psychological science.