Influence of envelope rise time on neural responses in the auditory system of anurans

The influence of envelope rise time on neural responses was investigated in the central auditory pathway of frogs. Single unit and evoked potential recordings were made from the dorsal medullary nucleus (DMN) and thalamus, respectively. It was found that phasic neurons (15% of the population) in the DMN responded preferentially to stimuli with rapid (less than 25 ms) rise times. Acoustically evoked potentials (AEPs) recorded from the thalamus, specifically the Nucleus of Bellonci, also showed more pronounced responses to stimuli with rapid, rather than slower, envelope rise times. Interestingly, the leopard frog mating call, which has a rapid onset, elicited strong neuronal discharge both within the DMN and thalamus. In contrast, the mating call of bullfrogs, a species sympatric with leopard frogs, has a characteristically slow (greater than 100 ms) envelope rise time and elicited little, if any, response. These findings indicate the presence of neural specializations within the frog's auditory pathway for the optimal detection of the conspecific mating call. The relevance of these findings for stimulus coding in the auditory pathway of other vertebrates is discussed.

[1]  Gary J. Rose,et al.  Frequency and Temporal Processing in the Auditory System of Anurans , 1983 .

[2]  Jos J. Eggermont,et al.  Sensitivity of neurons in the auditory midbrain of the grassfrog to temporal characteristics of sound. III. Stimulation with natural and synthetic mating calls , 1986, Hearing Research.

[3]  Acoustic communication in treefrogs , 1983 .

[4]  Kaplan Hm.  Anesthesia in amphibians and reptiles. , 1969 .

[5]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  The Vocal Repertoire of the Bullfrog (Rana Catesbeiana) , 1968 .

[6]  H. D. Potter,et al.  Patterns of acoustically evoked discharges of neurons in the mesencephalon of the bullfrog. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  A. L. Megela.  Auditory Response Properties of the Anuran Thalamus: Nonlinear Facilitation , 1983 .

[8]  G. Rose,et al.  Sensitivity to amplitude modulated sounds in the anuran auditory nervous system. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  A S Feng,et al.  Sound localization in anurans. II. Binaural interaction in superior olivary nucleus of the green tree frog (Hyla cinerea). , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Temporal selectivity in the central auditory system of the leopard frog. , 1983, Science.

[11]  I. V. Stokkum.  Sensitivity of neurons in the dorsal medullary nucleus of the grassfrog to spectral and temporal characteristics of sound , 1987, Hearing Research.

[12]  L. S. Frishkopf,et al.  Neural coding in the bullfrog's auditory system a teleological approach , 1968 .

[13]  M. Littlejohn,et al.  Rana pipiens Complex: Mating Call Structure and Taxonomy , 1968, Science.

[14]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Synchrony of Neural Activity in Electric Responses Evoked by Transient Acoustic Stimuli , 1958 .

[15]  William N. Tavolga,et al.  Animal Sounds and Communication , 1960 .

[16]  N Suga,et al.  Responses of inferior collicular neurones of bats to tone bursts with different rise times , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  Potter Hd,et al.  Mesencephalic auditory region of the bullfrog. , 1965 .

[18]  W. Plassmann,et al.  Coding of amplitude-modulated tones in the central auditory system of catfish , 1985, Hearing Research.

[19]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Tracing Neural Connections with Horseradish Peroxidase , 1982 .

[20]  Adrian Rees,et al.  Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat to AM and FM tones , 1983, Hearing Research.

[21]  R. Northcutt,et al.  Nuclear organization of the bullfrog diencephalon , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[22]  A. Rees,et al.  Steady-state evoked responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated sounds recorded in man , 1986, Hearing Research.

[23]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  The auditory system of anuran amphibians , 1984, Progress in Neurobiology.

[24]  A S Feng,et al.  Sound localization in anurans. I. Evidence of binaural interaction in dorsal medullary nucleus of bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana). , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  The evoked vocal response of the bullfrog- A study of communication by sound , 1966 .

[26]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Neural adaptations for processing the two-note call of the Puerto Rican treefrog, Eleutherodactylus coqui. , 1980, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[27]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Temperature Coupling in the Vocal Communication System of the Gray Tree Frog, Hyla versicolor , 1978, Science.

[28]  Jos J. Eggermont,et al.  Sensitivity of neurons in the auditory midbrain of the grassfrog to temporal characteristics of sound. II. Stimulation with amplitude modulated sound , 1986, Hearing Research.

[29]  H. Davis,et al.  Effects of duration and rise time of tone bursts on evoked V potentials. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  S. Salthe,et al.  5 – REPRODUCTIVE AND COURTSHIP PATTERNS , 1974 .

[31]  A. Feng,et al.  Evidence for parallel processing in the frog's auditory thalamus , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[32]  Albert S. Feng,et al.  Neural analysis of temporally patterned sounds in the frog's thalamus: Processing of pulse duration and pulse repetition rate , 1986, Neuroscience Letters.

[33]  H. Gerhardt.  MATING CALL RECOGNITION IN THE GREEN TREEFROG {HYLA CINEREA): THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SOME FINE-TEMPORAL PROPERTIES , 1978 .

[34]  C. M. Bogert.  The influence of sound on the behavior of amphibians and reptiles. , 1962 .

[35]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Speech sounds and features , 1973 .