A preliminary study to identify a neurophysiological correlate of electroacoustic pitch matching in cochlear implant users

One challenge facing postlingually-deafened cochlear implant (CI) users is the frequency mismatch between the incoming acoustic signal and the characteristic frequency of the electrically stimulated neurons. Current CI is an open-loop system and it requires extensive fine-tuning to help users to adapt to this mismatch over time. Electric-acoustic pitch matching in unilateral cochlear implant (CI) participants who has residual hearing in the non-implanted ear had been shown to serve as a useful metric to monitor adaptation process. The goal of this study was to identify a potential neurophysiological correlate to this electroacoustic pitch matching for a possible metric to track the adaptation process of CI users over time and a possible feedback for a closed-loop CI system design. This study utilized a method of presenting electrical and acoustic stimuli that were continuously alternating across ears. The stimuli were either matched or mismatched in pitch. Auditory Evoked Potentials (AEP) were recorded from 10 CI users and 10 normal hearing (NH) participants. For NH participants, an acoustic tone at a fixed frequency was presented in place of electrical stimulation. Results with CI participants indicated that N1 latency decreases when the acoustic frequency of the tone presented in the non-implanted ear increases. More importantly, there was an additional shortening of N1 latency in the pitch matched condition. These two patterns were repeated with NH participants. These results indicate the potential utility of N1 latency as an index of pitch matching in both normal hearing listeners and cochlear implant user.

[1]  Lina A J Reiss,et al.  Pitch Adaptation Patterns in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users: Over Time and After Experience , 2015, Ear and hearing.

[2]  H. Dillon,et al.  The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.

[3]  M. Svirsky,et al.  Current and planned cochlear implant research at New York University Laboratory for Translational Auditory Research. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[4]  Hugh McDermott,et al.  Electro-Acoustic Stimulation , 2009, Audiology and Neurotology.

[5]  Bruce J. Gantz,et al.  Changes in Pitch with a Cochlear Implant Over Time , 2007, Journal for the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[6]  Patricia A. Leake,et al.  Frequency Map for the Human Cochlear Spiral Ganglion: Implications for Cochlear Implants , 2007, Journal for the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[7]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Cochlear Implant Speech Processor Frequency Allocations May Influence Pitch Perception , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[8]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Sensitivity to Interaural Level Difference and Loudness Growth with Bilateral Bimodal Stimulation , 2007, Audiology and Neurotology.

[9]  T. Picton,et al.  Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  Claudiu Treaba,et al.  Real‐time measurement of electrode impedance during intracochlear electrode insertion , 2013, The Laryngoscope.

[11]  Chin-Tuan Tan,et al.  Pitch Matching between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Contralateral Ear with Residual Hearing , 2017, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[12]  P. Newall,et al.  Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[13]  C. Turner,et al.  Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation , 2014, Neuroscience.

[14]  Clemens Zierhofer,et al.  Frequency-place map for electrical stimulation in cochlear implants: Change over time , 2015, Hearing Research.