Identifying and analysing dominant preferences in discrete choice experiments: An application in health care

The assumption that goods are traded-off to maximise utility underpins many choice-based empirical methods used to elicit stated preferences. The aim of this paper is to test and examine the implications of this assumption in the context of a discrete choice experiment that examined stated preferences for different models of out of hours care provided by General Practitioners. The results indicated that 45% of individuals exhibited evidence of dominant preferences, a special case of a lexicographic ordering. Factors influencing the existence of dominant preferences included the complexity of the choices, but also individuals' past experiences. The analysis of dominant preferences provided important information about individuals with particularly strong preferences, and suggested different policy conclusions for this group of respondents.

[1]  C. Manski.  The structure of random utility models , 1977 .

[2]  Peter E. Earl,et al.  The economic imagination : towards a behavioural analysis of choice , 1984 .

[3]  E. McIntosh,et al.  Applying conjoint analysis in economic evaluations: an application to menorrhagia , 2000 .

[4]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  Michael Lockwood,et al.  Non‐Compensatory Preference Structures in Non‐Market Valuation of Natural Area Policy , 1996 .

[6]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Lexicographic tradeoff structures , 1978 .

[7]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. , 1999 .

[8]  A Shiell,et al.  Values and preferences are not necessarily the same. , 1997, Health economics.

[9]  A. Tversky.  Choice by elimination , 1972 .

[10]  R. Wilkinson,et al.  Economics and Consumer Behaviour , 1981 .

[11]  P. Dolan,et al.  The nature of individual preferences: a prologue to Johannesson, Jonsson and Karlsson. , 1997, Health economics.

[12]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[13]  K. Lancaster,et al.  Modern Consumer Theory , 1991 .

[14]  G. Chakraborty,et al.  Understanding consumers' preferences for dental service. , 1993, Journal of health care marketing.

[15]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  LEXICOGRAPHIC ORDERS, UTILITIES AND DECISION RULES: A SURVEY , 1974 .

[16]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Measurement of Travel Time Values and Opportunity Cost from a Discrete-Choice Model , 1985 .

[17]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[18]  C. Propper.  The Disutility of Time Spent on the United Kingdom's National Health Service Waiting Lists , 1995 .

[19]  A. Scott,et al.  Eliciting preferences of the community for out of hours care provided by general practitioners: a stated preference discrete choice experiment. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[20]  H. Simon,et al.  Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioural Science , 1966 .

[21]  K. Lancaster.  A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[23]  S. F. Edwards.  ETHICAL PREFERENCES AND THE ASSESSMENT OF EXISTENCE VALUES: DOES THE NEOCLASSICAL MODEL FIT? , 1986 .

[24]  H. Theil.  Introduction to econometrics , 1978 .

[25]  Using Conjoint Analysis In Health Care: Unresolved Methodological Issues , 1996 .

[26]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[27]  Stavros A. Drakopoulos,et al.  Hierarchical Choice in Economics , 1994 .