Topology and Robustness in the Drosophila Segment Polarity Network

A complex hierarchy of genetic interactions converts a single-celled Drosophila melanogaster egg into a multicellular embryo with 14 segments. Previously, von Dassow et al. reported that a mathematical model of the genetic interactions that defined the polarity of segments (the segment polarity network) was robust (von Dassow et al. 2000). As quantitative information about the system was unavailable, parameters were sampled randomly. A surprisingly large fraction of these parameter sets allowed the model to maintain and elaborate on the segment polarity pattern. This robustness is due to the positive feedback of gene products on their own expression, which induces individual cells in a model segment to adopt different stable expression states (bistability) corresponding to different cell types in the segment polarity pattern. A positive feedback loop will only yield multiple stable states when the parameters that describe it satisfy a particular inequality. By testing which random parameter sets satisfy these inequalities, I show that bistability is necessary to form the segment polarity pattern and serves as a strong predictor of which parameter sets will succeed in forming the pattern. Although the original model was robust to parameter variation, it could not reproduce the observed effects of cell division on the pattern of gene expression. I present a modified version that incorporates recent experimental evidence and does successfully mimic the consequences of cell division. The behavior of this modified model can also be understood in terms of bistability in positive feedback of gene expression. I discuss how this topological property of networks provides robust pattern formation and how large changes in parameters can change the specific pattern produced by a network.

[1]  H. Othmer,et al.  The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  J. Ferrell,et al.  Bistability in the JNK cascade , 2001, Current Biology.

[3]  Bénédicte Sanson,et al.  Generating patterns from fields of cells , 2001, EMBO reports.

[4]  V. Hatini,et al.  Divide and conquer: pattern formation in Drosophila embryonic epidermis. , 2001, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[5]  T. Tabata,et al.  The Drosophila hedgehog gene is expressed specifically in posterior compartment cells and is a target of engrailed regulation. , 1992, Genes & development.

[6]  A. Novick,et al.  ENZYME INDUCTION AS AN ALL-OR-NONE PHENOMENON. , 1957, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  E. Wimmer,et al.  MAP Kinase Phosphatase As a Locus of Flexibility in a Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Network , 2022 .

[8]  Reinhart Heinrich,et al.  The Roles of APC and Axin Derived from Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of the Wnt Pathway , 2003, PLoS biology.

[9]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Combinatorial Synthesis of Genetic Networks , 2002, Science.

[10]  L. Glass,et al.  The logical analysis of continuous, non-linear biochemical control networks. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  Prahlad T. Ram,et al.  MAP Kinase Phosphatase As a Locus of Flexibility in a Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Network , 2002, Science.

[12]  C. K. Motzny,et al.  The Drosophila cubitus interruptus protein and its role in the wingless and hedgehog signal transduction pathways , 1995, Mechanisms of Development.

[13]  P. O’Farrell,et al.  The making of a maggot: patterning the Drosophila embryonic epidermis. , 1994, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[14]  K. Basler,et al.  The repressor and activator forms of Cubitus interruptus control Hedgehog target genes through common generic gli-binding sites. , 2000, Development.

[15]  G. Odell,et al.  Design and constraints of the Drosophila segment polarity module: robust spatial patterning emerges from intertwined cell state switches. , 2002, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[16]  J. Hasty,et al.  Noise-based switches and amplifiers for gene expression. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  G. Odell,et al.  The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module , 2000, Nature.

[18]  Brian Gough,et al.  GNU Scientific Library Reference Manual - Third Edition , 2003 .

[19]  N. Méthot,et al.  An absolute requirement for Cubitus interruptus in Hedgehog signaling. , 2001, Development.

[20]  A. Keller,et al.  Specifying epigenetic states with autoregulatory transcription factors. , 1994, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  Cyrille Alexandre,et al.  Requirements for transcriptional repression and activation by Engrailed in Drosophila embryos , 2003, Development.

[22]  P. O’Farrell,et al.  Multiple modes of engrailed regulation in the progression towards cell fate determination , 1991, Nature.

[23]  L. Wolpert Developmental Biology , 1968, Nature.

[24]  R. Thomas,et al.  Multistationarity, the basis of cell differentiation and memory. I. Structural conditions of multistationarity and other nontrivial behavior. , 2001, Chaos.