On the influence of patient‐specific material properties in computational simulations: A case study of a large ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Patient-specific modelling of abdominal aortic aneurysm has been shown to have clinical potential. This paper examines a large ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm where the tissue from the diseased wall and the intraluminal thrombus was excised during open surgical repair and experimentally characterised. The mechanical data were used to develop material parameters that were incorporated into finite element models with measured nonuniform wall thickness. Implementation of the material data into the numerical model increased peak wall stress by 67%, wall strain by 320% and displacement by 177%, when compared with simulations based on material properties available in the literature. Distributions of numerical results were similar for both material data. Magnitudes of numerical results can differ significantly when using patient-specific material properties and therefore, care should be taken when interpreting numerical results derived from population-based data.

[1]  Mark F Fillinger,et al.  Anatomic characteristics of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm on conventional CT scans: Implications for rupture risk. , 2004, Journal of vascular surgery.

[2]  J Swedenborg,et al.  Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: model complexity versus predictability of finite element simulations. , 2010, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[3]  Jonathan P Vande Geest,et al.  Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue. , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[4]  B. Doyle,et al.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 2011 .

[5]  J. Gillard,et al.  Impact of calcification and intraluminal thrombus on the computed wall stresses of abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2008, Journal of vascular surgery.

[6]  M L Raghavan,et al.  Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Frans N van de Vosse,et al.  Effects of wall calcifications in patient-specific wall stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[8]  M. Webster,et al.  Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[9]  D. Brewster,et al.  Autopsy Study of Unoperated Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: The Case for Early Resection , 1977, Circulation.

[10]  J. Xiong,et al.  Measurement and analysis of ultimate mechanical properties, stress-strain curve fit, and elastic modulus formula of human abdominal aortic aneurysm and nonaneurysmal abdominal aorta. , 2008, Journal of vascular surgery.

[11]  J. H. van Bockel,et al.  Thrombus within an aortic aneurysm does not reduce pressure on the aneurysmal wall. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[12]  F. N. van de Vosse,et al.  The mechanical role of thrombus on the growth rate of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.

[13]  W. Wall,et al.  A Comparison of Diameter, Wall Stress, and Rupture Potential Index for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture Risk Prediction , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Mark F Fillinger,et al.  Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[15]  Elena S. Di Martino,et al.  Effect of Variation in Intraluminal Thrombus Constitutive Properties on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall Stress , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Barry J Doyle,et al.  A comparison of modelling techniques for computing wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms , 2007, Biomedical engineering online.

[17]  David A. Vorp,et al.  Towards A Noninvasive Method for Determination of Patient-Specific Wall Strength Distribution in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Jonathan H. Gillard,et al.  Association Between Aneurysm Shoulder Stress and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Expansion: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study , 2010, Circulation.

[19]  E Georgakarakos,et al.  Peak wall stress does not necessarily predict the location of rupture in abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2010, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[20]  A. Perillo-Marcone,et al.  Effect of varus/valgus malalignment on bone strains in the proximal tibia after TKR: an explicit finite element study. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  Mark F Fillinger,et al.  In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[22]  M. Webster,et al.  Ex vivo biomechanical behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Assessment using a new mathematical model , 1996, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Michael T Walsh,et al.  Vessel asymmetry as an additional diagnostic tool in the assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2009, Journal of vascular surgery.

[24]  Christian Reeps,et al.  The impact of model assumptions on results of computational mechanics in abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.

[25]  M. Bots,et al.  Circumferential heterogeneity in the abdominal aortic aneurysm wall composition suggests lateral sides to be more rupture prone. , 2012, Journal of vascular surgery.

[26]  F. Kennedy,et al.  Elemental composition, morphology and mechanical properties of calcified deposits obtained from abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2006, Acta biomaterialia.

[27]  Shmuel Einav,et al.  Patient-Based Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture Risk Prediction with Fluid Structure Interaction Modeling , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  Madhavan L Raghavan,et al.  Biomechanical failure properties and microstructural content of ruptured and unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  Madhavan L Raghavan,et al.  Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  M J Fagan,et al.  A comparative study of aortic wall stress using finite element analysis for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2004, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[31]  R Fumero,et al.  Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the presence of endoluminal thrombus: experimental characterisation and structural static computational analysis. , 1998, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[32]  D A Vorp,et al.  Mechanical properties and microstructure of intraluminal thrombus from abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[33]  W A Wall,et al.  Impact of calcifications on patient-specific wall stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms , 2010, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[34]  Barry J Doyle,et al.  Use of the photoelastic method and finite element analysis in the assessment of wall strain in abdominal aortic aneurysm models. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  T Christian Gasser,et al.  Failure properties of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm under static and pulsating mechanical loads. , 2008, Journal of vascular surgery.

[36]  M. Webster,et al.  Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[37]  Richard Lorne Ehman,et al.  MR elastography of the in vivo abdominal aorta: A feasibility study for comparing aortic stiffness between hypertensives and normotensives , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.