Numerical simulation and experimental validation of the large deformation bending and folding behavior of magneto-active elastomer composites

This work seeks to provide a framework for the numerical simulation of magneto-active elastomer (MAE) composite structures for use in origami engineering applications. The emerging field of origami engineering employs folding techniques, an array of crease patterns traditionally on a single flat sheet of paper, to produce structures and devices that perform useful engineering operations. Effective means of numerical simulation offer an efficient way to optimize the crease patterns while coupling to the performance and behavior of the active material. The MAE materials used herein are comprised of nominally 30% v/v, 325 mesh barium hexafarrite particles embedded in Dow HS II silicone elastomer compound. These particulate composites are cured in a magnetic field to produce magneto-elastic solids with anisotropic magnetization, e.g. they have a preferred magnetic axis parallel to the curing axis. The deformed shape and/or blocked force characteristics of these MAEs are examined in three geometries: a monolithic cantilever as well as two- and four-segment composite accordion structures. In the accordion structures, patches of MAE material are bonded to a Gelest OE41 unfilled silicone elastomer substrate. Two methods of simulation, one using the Maxwell stress tensor applied as a traction boundary condition and another employing a minimum energy kinematic (MEK) model, are investigated. Both methods capture actuation due to magnetic torque mechanisms that dominate MAE behavior. Comparison with experimental data show good agreement with only a single adjustable parameter, either an effective constant magnetization of the MAE material in the finite element models (at small and moderate deformations) or an effective modulus in the minimum energy model. The four-segment finite element model was prone to numerical locking at large deformation. The effective magnetization and modulus values required are a fraction of the actual experimentally measured values which suggests a reduction in the amount of magnetic torque transferred from the particles to the matrix.

[1]  G. Zhou,et al.  Shear properties of a magnetorheological elastomer , 2003 .

[2]  Evan Galipeau,et al.  The effect of particle shape and distribution on the macroscopic behavior of magnetoelastic composites , 2012 .

[3]  Ray W. Ogden,et al.  On electric body forces and Maxwell stresses in nonlinearly electroelastic solids , 2009 .

[4]  Jiun-Shyan Chen,et al.  Micromechanics-based hyperelastic constitutive modeling of magnetostrictive particle-filled elastomers , 2002 .

[5]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Stretchable circuits and sensors for robotic origami , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[6]  R. Ogden,et al.  Nonlinear magnetoelastic deformations , 2004 .

[7]  R. Ogden,et al.  Magnetoelastic modelling of elastomers , 2003 .

[8]  Al Dorfmann,et al.  Constitutive modelling of magneto-sensitive Cauchy-elastic solids , 2004 .

[9]  Mattias Lokander,et al.  Improving the magnetorheological effect in isotropic magnetorheological rubber materials , 2003 .

[10]  Yi Sun,et al.  Sensor and actuator integrated low-profile robotic origami , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[11]  Alexander V. Chertovich,et al.  Magnetorheological and deformation properties of magnetically controlled elastomers with hard magnetic filler , 2012 .

[12]  S. Lofland,et al.  Investigating new symmetry classes in magnetorheological elastomers: cantilever bending behavior , 2011 .

[13]  Jeong-Hoi Koo,et al.  Dynamic characterization of bimodal particle mixtures in silicone rubber magnetorheological materials , 2008 .

[14]  H. Okuzaki,et al.  A biomorphic origami actuator fabricated by folding a conducting paper , 2008 .

[15]  David J. Steigmann,et al.  Magnetoelasticity of highly deformable thin films: Theory and simulation , 2011 .

[16]  R. Ogden,et al.  A nonlinear magnetoelastic tube under extension and inflation in an axial magnetic field: numerical solution , 2007 .

[17]  P. Steinmann,et al.  On somemixedvariationalprinciplesinmagneto-elastostatics , 2013 .

[18]  Jeong-Hoi Koo,et al.  Characterization of actuation properties of magnetorheological elastomers with embedded hard magnetic particles , 2012 .

[19]  The Maxwell stress tensor for magnetoelastic materials , 2009 .

[20]  O. Bruno,et al.  On the magneto-elastic properties of elastomer–ferromagnet composites , 2001 .

[21]  M. Shamonin,et al.  Evaluation of highly compliant magneto-active elastomers with colossal magnetorheological response , 2014 .

[22]  Evan Galipeau,et al.  A finite-strain constitutive model for magnetorheological elastomers: Magnetic torques and fiber rotations , 2013 .

[23]  G. Bossis,et al.  Micromechanical analysis of an elastomer filled with particles organized in chain-like structure , 2006 .

[24]  N. Triantafyllidis,et al.  On finitely strained magnetorheological elastomers , 2004 .

[25]  Mehdi Farshad,et al.  Magnetoactive elastomer composites , 2004 .

[26]  Deformation of an ellipsoidal ferrogel sample in a uniform magnetic field , 2005 .

[27]  Evan Galipeau,et al.  Homogenization-based constitutive models for magnetorheological elastomers at finite strain , 2011 .

[28]  Paul Steinmann,et al.  On some mixed variational principles in electro-elastostatics , 2012 .

[29]  Paris von Lockette,et al.  Role of Magnetization Anisotropy in the Active Behavior of Magnetorheological Elastomers , 2011 .

[30]  G. Heppler,et al.  Experimental Research and Modeling of Magnetorheological Elastomers , 2004 .

[31]  R. Ogden,et al.  Numerical solution of finite geometry boundary-value problems in nonlinear magnetoelasticity , 2011 .

[32]  Hyungmin Park,et al.  A comparison among Neo-Hookean model, Mooney-Rivlin model, and Ogden model for chloroprene rubber , 2012 .

[33]  S. K. Dwivedy,et al.  Dynamic stability of magnetorheological elastomer based adaptive sandwich beam with conductive skins using FEM and the harmonic balance method , 2013 .

[34]  T. Saha‐Dasgupta,et al.  Ferroic properties in bi-component perovskites: artificial superlattices and naturally forming compounds , 2014, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[35]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Elastomeric Origami: Programmable Paper‐Elastomer Composites as Pneumatic Actuators , 2012 .

[36]  Paris von Lockette,et al.  Folding Actuation and Locomotion of Novel Magneto-Active Elastomer (MAE) Composites , 2013 .

[37]  Xiangdong Chen,et al.  MEMS magnetometer based on magnetorheological elastomer , 2012 .

[38]  Mattias Lokander,et al.  Performance of isotropic magnetorheological rubber materials , 2003 .

[39]  Youwei Du,et al.  Martensitic transformation and related magnetic effects in Ni—Mn-based ferromagnetic shape memory alloys , 2013 .

[40]  Daniel A. White,et al.  Finite element modeling of the deformation of magnetoelastic film , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[41]  Y. Raikher,et al.  Shape instability of a magnetic elastomer membrane , 2008 .