Net assimilation rate, specific leaf area and leaf mass ratio: which is most closely correlated with relative growth rate? A meta‐analysis

Summary 1Data were compiled consisting of 1240 observations (614 species) from 83 different experiments published in 37 different studies, in order to quantify the relative importance of net assimilation rate (NAR, g cm−2 day−1), specific leaf area (SLA, cm2 g−1) and leaf mass ratio (LMR, g g−1) in determining relative growth rate (RGR, g g−1 day−1), and how these change with respect to daily quantum input (DQI, moles m−2 day−1) and growth form (herbaceous or woody). 2Each of ln(NAR), ln(SLA) and ln(LMR) were separately regressed on ln(RGR) using mixed model regressions in order to partition the between-experiment and within-experiment variation in slopes and intercepts. DQI and plant type were then added to these models to see if they could explain some of the between-experiment variation in the relative importance of each growth component. 3LMR was never strongly related to RGR. In general, NAR was the best general predictor of variation in RGR. However, for determining RGR the importance of NAR decreased, and the importance of SLA increased, with decreasing daily quantum input in experiments containing herbaceous species. This did not occur in experiments involving woody species.

[1]  O. O. Osunkoya,et al.  Influence of seed size and seedling ecological attributes on shade-tolerance of rain-forest tree species in northern Queensland , 1994 .

[2]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. , 1980 .

[3]  A. Fitter,et al.  Growth temperature influences the underlying components of relative growth rate: an investigation using inherently fast‐ and slow‐growing plant species , 2002 .

[4]  L. Rochefort,et al.  Germination and seedling growth of bog plants in relation to the recolonization of milled peatlands , 2003, Plant Ecology.

[5]  M. Westoby,et al.  Components of variation in seedling potential relative growth rate: phylogenetically independent contrasts , 1996, Oecologia.

[6]  P. Reich,et al.  Temperature and ontogeny mediate growth response to elevated CO2 in seedlings of five boreal tree species. , 1998, The New phytologist.

[7]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[8]  P. J. Myerscough,et al.  COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY OF TUSSILAGO FARFARA L., CHAMAFNFRION ANGUSTIFOLIUM (L.) SCOP., EPILOBIUM MONTANUM L., AND FPILOBIUM ADFNOCAULON HAUSSKN. , 1967 .

[9]  E. Rincón,et al.  Nutrient availability and growth rate of 34 woody species from a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico , 1995 .

[10]  P. Ryser,et al.  Interspecific Variation in RGR and the Underlying Traits among 24 Grass Species Grown in Full Daylight , 2001 .

[11]  J. R. Evans,et al.  Variation in the components of relative growth rate in 10 Acacia species from contrasting environments , 1998 .

[12]  B. Shipley,et al.  Interacting components of interspecific relative growth rate: constancy and change under differing conditions of light and nutrient supply , 1999 .

[13]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[14]  R. Hunt,et al.  Components of relative growth rate and their interrelations in 59 temperate plant species , 1997 .

[15]  William G. Lee,et al.  INTERACTION OF IRRADIANCE AND SOIL NUTRIENT SUPPLY ON GROWTH OF SEEDLINGS OF TEN EUROPEAN TALL-SHRUB SPECIES AND FAGUS SYLVATICA , 1996 .

[16]  D. Tilman.  Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. (MPB-26), Volume 26 , 1988 .

[17]  Lourens Poorter,et al.  Growth responses of 15 rain‐forest tree species to a light gradient: the relative importance of morphological and physiological traits , 1999 .

[18]  Mark G. Tjoelker,et al.  Close association of RGR, leaf and root morphology, seed mass and shade tolerance in seedlings of nine boreal tree species grown in high and low light , 1998 .

[19]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate , 1990, Oecologia.

[20]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[21]  M. Westoby,et al.  Cross‐species relationships between seedling relative growth rate, nitrogen productivity and root vs leaf function in 28 Australian woody species , 2000 .

[22]  H. Lambers,et al.  The relationship between the relative growth rate and nitrogen economy of alpine and lowland Poa species , 1996 .

[23]  I. E. Woodrow,et al.  The utilization of lightflecks for growth in four Australian rain‐forest species , 1997 .

[24]  M. Crawley.  Mixed‐Effects Models , 2007 .

[25]  R. Verburg,et al.  Inherent allocation patterns and potential growth rates of herbaceous climbing plants , 1996, Plant and Soil.

[26]  K. Mather,et al.  Components of variation , 1971 .

[27]  P. Reich,et al.  From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  B. Shipley,et al.  Interacting determinants of interspecific relative growth: Empirical patterns and a theoretical explanation , 1999 .

[29]  E. Garnier.  Growth analysis of congeneric annual and perennial grass species , 1992 .

[30]  Bill Shipley,et al.  Trade‐offs between net assimilation rate and specific leaf area in determining relative growth rate: relationship with daily irradiance , 2002 .

[31]  Mark Westoby,et al.  A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[32]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[33]  Peter J. Grubb,et al.  Physiological basis and ecological significance of the seed size and relative growth rate relationship in Mediterranean annuals , 1993 .

[34]  Hans Lambers,et al.  Plant Physiological Ecology , 1998, Springer New York.

[35]  M. Rejmánek,et al.  Toward a Causal Explanation of Plant Invasiveness: Seedling Growth and Life‐History Strategies of 29 Pine (Pinus) Species , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[36]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties , 2006 .

[37]  D. Taub.  Analysis of interspecific variation in plant growth responses to nitrogen , 2002 .

[38]  H. Poorter,et al.  A physiological and genetic analysis of growth characteristics in Hordeum spontaneum , 2001 .

[39]  J. Roy,et al.  Growth response of grasses to elevated CO2: a physiological plurispecific analysis , 1996 .

[40]  E. Rincón,et al.  Responses to light changes in tropical deciduous woody seedlings with contrasting growth rates , 1997, Oecologia.

[41]  Peter B Reich,et al.  Variation in growth rate and ecophysiology among 34 grassland and savanna species under contrasting N supply: a test of functional group differences. , 2003, The New phytologist.

[42]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Seedling growth, allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and types , 1996 .

[43]  G. Fanelli,et al.  Relative growth rate and hemerobiotic state in the assessment of disturbance gradients , 2004 .

[44]  M. Candel.  Performance of empirical Bayes estimators of random coefficients in multilevel analysis: Some results for the random intercept‐only model , 2004 .

[45]  R. C. Hardwick,et al.  Variation in relative growth rate , 1986 .

[46]  P. J. Myerscough,et al.  Comparative biology of Tussilago farfara L., Chamaenerion angustifolium (L) Scop., Epilobium montanum L. and Epilobium adenocaulon Hausskn. 1. General biology and germination. , 1966 .

[47]  H. Lambers,et al.  Variation in relative growth rate of 20 Aegilops species (Poaceae) in the field: The importance of net assimilation rate or specific leaf area depends on the time scale , 2005, Plant and Soil.