Stroke-unit care for acute stroke patients: an observational follow-up study

BACKGROUND Large numbers of stroke patients arrive at hospital at a very early stage, and effective treatments for the acute phase of the disease are available. However, evidence that patients with acute stroke benefit from stroke-unit care is scarce. Our aim was to determine whether admission to a stroke unit, rather than a conventional ward, affected the outcome of patients with acute stroke. METHODS We did an observational follow-up study of 11 572 acute stroke patients hospitalised within 48 h of the onset of symptoms either in a stroke unit (n=4936) or in a conventional ward (6636). Patients were identified retrospectively from discharge records from 260 Italian hospitals. The primary outcome was mortality or disability (Rankin score greater than two), assessed prospectively by independent, masked assessors 2 years after admission. Analyses were adjusted for patient characteristics and clustered at the hospital level. FINDINGS Overall, 1576 patients died in hospital; 2169 died during the follow-up period. 347 patients were lost to follow-up. Compared with conventional-ward care, stroke-unit care was associated with a reduced probability of death or being disabled at the end of follow-up (odds ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.91; p=0.0001). The potential benefit was significant across all age ranges and clinical characteristics, except for unconsciousness. No specific elements of setting, organisation, or process of care were associated with outcome. INTERPRETATION Admission to a stroke-unit ward with dedicated beds and staff within 48 h of onset should be recommended for all patients with acute stroke.

[1]  A. Laupacis,et al.  Stroke Care Delivery in Institutions Participating in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network , 2004, Stroke.

[2]  M. Dennis Stroke services: the good, the bad and the.... , 2000, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.

[3]  M. Hadley,et al.  Recommendations for Comprehensive Stroke Centers: A Consensus Statement From the Brain Attack Coalition , 2005, Stroke.

[4]  Lalit Kalra,et al.  Can differences in management processes explain different outcomes between stroke unit and stroke-team care? , 2001, The Lancet.

[5]  M. Brainin,et al.  Acute neurological stroke care in Europe: results of the European Stroke Care Inventory , 2000, European journal of neurology.

[6]  V. Hachinski Editorial Board , 2022, European Urology Focus.

[7]  AnnaCavallini,et al.  Role of Monitoring in Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients , 2003 .

[8]  H. Schouten,et al.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. , 1988, Stroke.

[9]  R. Hayes,et al.  Simple sample size calculation for cluster-randomized trials. , 1999, International journal of epidemiology.

[10]  G. Donnan,et al.  Multicenter Comparison of Processes of Care Between Stroke Units and Conventional Care Wards in Australia , 2004, Stroke.

[11]  Ugo Fedeli,et al.  Measuring Accuracy of Discharge Diagnoses for a Region-Wide Surveillance of Hospitalized Strokes , 2005, Stroke.

[12]  J. Slattery,et al.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. , 1989, Stroke.

[13]  M. Kaste,et al.  Where and how should elderly stroke patients be treated? A randomized trial. , 1995, Stroke.

[14]  A. Rudd,et al.  Stroke Unit Care and Outcome: Results from the 2001 National Sentinel Audit of Stroke (England, Wales, and Northern Ireland) , 2005, Stroke.

[15]  S. Slørdahl,et al.  Treatment in a combined acute and rehabilitation stroke unit: which aspects are most important? , 1999, Stroke.

[16]  B. Norrving,et al.  Stroke units in their natural habitat: can results of randomized trials be reproduced in routine clinical practice? Riks-Stroke Collaboration. , 1999, Stroke.

[17]  E. Glader,et al.  Differences in Long-Term Outcome Between Patients Treated in Stroke Units and in General Wards: A 2-Year Follow-Up of Stroke Patients in Sweden , 2001, Stroke.

[18]  S. Slørdahl,et al.  Stroke unit treatment. 10-year follow-up. , 1999, Stroke.

[19]  S. Johnston,et al.  Do the Brain Attack Coalition’s criteria for stroke centers improve care for ischemic stroke? , 2005, Neurology.

[20]  B. Norrving Organized stroke care: the core of effective stroke care provision. , 2005, Stroke.

[21]  M. Kaste,et al.  Published guidelines: update and synthesis , 2003 .

[22]  J M Bland,et al.  The intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomisation , 1998, BMJ.

[23]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Organized Inpatient (Stroke Unit) Care for Stroke , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[24]  O. Rønning,et al.  Stroke unit versus general medical wards, II: neurological deficits and activities of daily living: a quasi-randomized controlled trial. , 1998, Stroke.

[25]  M. Musicco,et al.  Telephone Interview for Stroke Outcome Assessment , 1994 .

[26]  N. Maurits,et al.  Admitting Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients to a Stroke Care Monitoring Unit Versus a Conventional Stroke Unit: A Randomized Pilot Study , 2003, Stroke.

[27]  Valérie Buthion,et al.  ColoNav: patient navigation for colorectal cancer screening in deprived areas – Study protocol , 1999, BMC Cancer.

[28]  PeterLanghorne,et al.  Stroke Units in Their Natural Habitat , 2007 .

[29]  R. Sterzi,et al.  Stroke units and general wards in seven Italian regions: the PROSIT Study , 2005, Neurological Sciences.

[30]  R. Sterzi,et al.  Assessment of Regional Acute Stroke Unit Care in Italy: The PROSIT Study , 2003, Cerebrovascular Diseases.