Plasma-first: accelerating lung cancer diagnosis and molecular profiling through liquid biopsy

Introduction: Molecular profiling of tumor tissue is the gold standard for treatment decision-making in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Results may be delayed or unavailable due to insufficient tissue, prolonged wait times for biopsy, pathology assessment and testing. We piloted the use of plasma testing in the initial diagnostic workup for patients with suspected advanced lung cancer. Methods: Patients with ⩽15 pack-year smoking history and suspected advanced lung cancer referred to the lung cancer rapid diagnostic program underwent plasma circulating-tumor DNA testing using a DNA-based mutation panel. Tissue testing was performed per standard of care, including comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS). The primary endpoint was time from diagnostic program referral to cancer treatment in stage IV NSCLC patients (Cohort A) compared to a contemporary cohort not enrolled in the study (Cohort B) and an historical pre-COVID cohort referred to the program between 2018 and 2019 (Cohort C). Results: From January to June 2021, 20 patients were enrolled in Cohort A; median age was 70.5 years (range 33–87), 70% were female, 55% Caucasian, 85% never smokers, and 75% were diagnosed with NSCLC. Seven had actionable alterations detected in plasma or tissue (4/7 concordant). Fusions, not tested in plasma, were identified by immunohistochemistry for three patients. Mean result turnaround time was 17.8 days for plasma NGS and 23.6 days for tissue (p = 0.10). Mean time from referral to treatment initiation was significantly shorter in cohort A at 32.6 days (SD 13.1) versus 62.2 days (SD 31.2) in cohort B and 61.5 days (SD 29.1) in cohort C, both p < 0.0001. Conclusion: Liquid biopsy in the initial diagnostic workup of patients with suspected advanced NSCLC can lead to faster molecular results and shorten time to treatment even with smaller DNA panels. An expansion study using comprehensive NGS plasma testing with faster turnaround time is ongoing (NCT04862924).

[1]  W. Hwang,et al.  Association of comprehensive molecular genotyping and overall survival in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. , 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  N. Robert,et al.  Biomarker testing and tissue journey among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer receiving first-line therapy in the US Oncology Network biomarker testing in metastatic NSCLC with first-line therapy. , 2022, Lung cancer.

[3]  E. Nadler,et al.  Real-world patterns of biomarker testing and targeted therapy in de novo metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients in the US oncology network. , 2022, Cancer treatment and research communications.

[4]  A. George,et al.  A pilot of Blood-First diagnostic cell free DNA (cfDNA) next generation sequencing (NGS) in patients with suspected advanced lung cancer. , 2022, Lung cancer.

[5]  R. Vandermeer,et al.  OA16.02 The Economic Value of Liquid Biopsy for Genomic Profiling in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2021, Journal of Thoracic Oncology.

[6]  A. Karsan,et al.  Canadian ROS proto-oncogene 1 study (CROS) for multi-institutional implementation of ROS1 testing in non-small cell lung cancer. , 2021, Lung cancer.

[7]  B. Rapkin,et al.  Biomarker testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): An assessment of current practices in precision oncology in the community setting—A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group (EAQ161CD). , 2021 .

[8]  M. Tsao,et al.  Prevalence and heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression by 22C3 assay in routine population-based and reflexive clinical testing in lung cancer. , 2021, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[9]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  NCCN Guidelines Insights: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 2.2021. , 2021, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[10]  W. Weichert,et al.  Biomarker testing in non-small cell lung cancer in routine care: Analysis of the first 3,717 patients in the German prospective, observational, nation-wide CRISP Registry (AIO-TRK-0315). , 2020, Lung cancer.

[11]  A. Purushotham,et al.  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer deaths due to delays in diagnosis in England, UK: a national, population-based, modelling study , 2020, The Lancet Oncology.

[12]  R. Vandermeer,et al.  Demonstrating the value of liquid biopsy for lung cancer in a public health care system. , 2020 .

[13]  N. Leighl,et al.  Molecular testing for lung adenocarcinoma: Is it time to adopt a “plasma‐first” approach? , 2020, Cancer.

[14]  M. Tsao,et al.  Anaplastic lymphoma kinase 5A4 immunohistochemistry as a diagnostic assay in lung cancer: A Canadian reference testing center's results in population‐based reflex testing , 2019, Cancer.

[15]  V. Papadimitrakopoulou,et al.  Clinical Utility of Comprehensive Cell-free DNA Analysis to Identify Genomic Biomarkers in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Non–small Cell Lung Cancer , 2019, Clinical Cancer Research.

[16]  Sharyn I. Katz,et al.  Clinical Implications of Plasma-Based Genotyping With the Delivery of Personalized Therapy in Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2019, JAMA oncology.

[17]  E. Pisano,et al.  What Can Be Done to Improve Research Biopsy Quality in Oncology Clinical Trials? , 2018, Journal of oncology practice.

[18]  P. V. Van Schil,et al.  Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  Hensley H. Mariathas,et al.  Reducing Wait Time for Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: Impact of a Multidisciplinary, Centralized Referral Program , 2018, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[20]  M. Tsao,et al.  Upfront next generation sequencing in NSCLC: A publicly funded perspective. , 2018 .

[21]  Y. Lacasse,et al.  Wait times for diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer: a single-centre experience. , 2017, Current oncology.

[22]  G. Batist,et al.  Lung cancer care trajectory at a Canadian centre: an evaluation of how wait times affect clinical outcomes. , 2017, Current oncology.

[23]  M. Tsao,et al.  Improving molecular testing and personalized medicine in non-small-cell lung cancer in Ontario. , 2017, Current oncology.

[24]  R. Pe Benito,et al.  Genomic Profiling of Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer in Community Settings: Gaps and Opportunities , 2017, Clinical lung cancer.

[25]  A. Drilon,et al.  Changing the Therapeutic Landscape in Non-small Cell Lung Cancers: the Evolution of Comprehensive Molecular Profiling Improves Access to Therapy , 2017, Current Oncology Reports.

[26]  F. Shepherd,et al.  Patients with Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Are Research Biopsies a Barrier to Participation in Clinical Trials? , 2016, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[27]  M. Tsao,et al.  Biomarker testing and time to treatment decision in patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[28]  L. Levin,et al.  PMD19 COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR GENE MUTATION TESTING IN THE SELECTION OF FIRST-LINE THERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER IN ONTARIO , 2011 .