Mobile phone use among car drivers and motorcycle riders: The effect of problematic mobile phone use, attitudes, beliefs and perceived risk.

Mobile phone use while driving presents significant risks, potentially leading to injury or death through distracted driving. Using a case study of Vietnam, this research aimed to understand the effect of problematic mobile phone use (also known as mobile phone addiction or compulsive mobile phone use), attitudes and beliefs, and perceived risk on the frequency of mobile phone use among motorcyclists and car drivers. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to motorcyclists (n1= 529) and car drivers (n2= 328) using an online survey and face-to-face survey. The survey took around 20-min to complete and participants were entered into a lottery for supermarket vouchers. Of the motorcyclists, 42% of the sample (the highest proportion) was in the 18-25 age group while the 36-45 age group accounted for the highest proportion among car drivers (34.8%). Using structural equation modelling (SEM), key findings showed that each construct influenced mobile phone use, but in different ways for motorcycle riders and car drivers. Attitudes and beliefs had the largest effect on mobile phone use while riding among motorcyclists, with problematic mobile phone use having the smallest influence. In contrast, problematic mobile phone use had the largest effect on mobile phone use while driving a car, with attitudes and beliefs having the smallest effect. The findings of this study point to the need for tailored interventions involving a range of actors (policymakers, police enforcement, mental health professionals, advocacy groups and the wider community) to raise awareness, modify attitudes and increase risk perception associated with mobile phone use while driving/riding. This can be achieved thorough educational tools and road safety campaigns which are focused on reducing this risky driving behaviour. This includes customising road safety programs for individuals and groups affected by problematic mobile phone use such as targeted advertising.

[1]  Takayuki Morikawa,et al.  Analysis on Characteristics of Passenger Car and Motorcycle Fleets and Their Driving Conditions in Developing Country: A Case Study in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam , 2015 .

[2]  P. Carter,et al.  Social Norms and Risk Perception: Predictors of Distracted Driving Behavior Among Novice Adolescent Drivers , 2014, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[3]  Charlene Hallett,et al.  Cell phone conversing while driving in New Zealand: prevalence, risk perception and legislation. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Mark Asbridge,et al.  Cell phone use and traffic crash risk: a culpability analysis. , 2013, International journal of epidemiology.

[5]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis : a global perspective , 2010 .

[6]  Marilyn A. Campbell,et al.  The impact of the mobile phone on young people's social life , 2005 .

[7]  Louise P. Waddell,et al.  What’s driving illegal mobile phone use? Psychosocial influences on drivers’ intentions to use hand-held mobile phones , 2014 .

[8]  R. Lomax,et al.  The Effect of Varying Degrees of Nonnormality in Structural Equation Modeling , 2005 .

[9]  M. Sullman,et al.  The role of beliefs in the use of hands-free and handheld mobile phones while driving , 2018, Journal of Transport & Health.

[10]  Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios,et al.  Assessing driver acceptance of technology that reduces mobile phone use while driving: The case of mobile phone applications. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Chris De Gruyter,et al.  Exploring the prevalence and factors associated with self-reported traffic crashes among app-based motorcycle taxis in Vietnam , 2019, Transport Policy.

[12]  Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios,et al.  A hierarchical Bayesian multivariate ordered model of distracted drivers’ decision to initiate risk-compensating behaviour , 2020 .

[13]  S. Sayadi,et al.  Applying partial least squares to model genetically modified food purchase intentions in southern Spain consumers , 2013 .

[14]  Simon Washington,et al.  Risk factors of mobile phone use while driving in Queensland: Prevalence, attitudes, crash risk perception, and task-management strategies , 2017, PloS one.

[15]  Feng Guo,et al.  Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Sergio A. Useche,et al.  Distraction of cyclists: how does it influence their risky behaviors and traffic crashes? , 2018, PeerJ.

[17]  Simon Washington,et al.  Should I Text or Call Here? A Situation‐Based Analysis of Drivers’ Perceived Likelihood of Engaging in Mobile Phone Multitasking , 2018, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  W. Reinartz,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of the Efficacy of Covariance-Based and Variance-Based SEM , 2009 .

[19]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[20]  Traci D. Jarrett,et al.  Challenges of enforcing cell phone use while driving laws among police: a qualitative study , 2018, Injury Prevention.

[21]  Mark Vollrath,et al.  Systematic review of observational studies on secondary task engagement while driving. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  M. Linden,et al.  Does impulsivity relate to perceived dependence on and actual use of the mobile phone , 2007 .

[23]  N. Sze,et al.  Prevalence of cell phone use while driving and its impact on driving performance, focusing on near-crash risk: A survey study in Tehran , 2019 .

[24]  R. Homel.  Policing and Punishing the Drinking Driver: A Study of General and Specific Deterrence , 1989 .

[25]  P. Hackl,et al.  Robustness of partial least-squares method for estimating latent variable quality structures , 1999 .

[26]  D. Q. Nguyen-Phuoc,et al.  Risky behaviours associated with traffic crashes among app-based motorcycle taxi drivers in Vietnam , 2020 .

[27]  Ronggang Zhou,et al.  Why Do Drivers Use Mobile Phones While Driving? The Contribution of Compensatory Beliefs , 2016, PloS one.

[28]  M. Sullman,et al.  Factors influencing intentions to text while driving among Polish drivers , 2018 .

[29]  R. Darlington,et al.  Factor Analysis , 2008 .

[30]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using Ibm Spss Statistics , 2017 .

[31]  H. Kaiser,et al.  Little Jiffy, Mark Iv , 1974 .

[32]  Narelle L. Haworth,et al.  How do perceptions of risk and other psychological factors influence the use of in-vehicle information systems (IVIS)? , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[33]  Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios,et al.  Transcultural validation and reliability of the Spanish version of the Behaviour of Young Novice Drivers Scale (BYNDS) in a Colombian young driver population , 2017 .

[34]  Michael Fitzharris,et al.  Driver inattention and driver distraction in serious casualty crashes: data from the Australian National Crash In-depth Study. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[35]  M. Röösli,et al.  Problematic mobile phone use in adolescents: derivation of a short scale MPPUS-10 , 2015, International Journal of Public Health.

[36]  Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios,et al.  Pedestrian self-reported use of smart phones: Positive attitudes and high exposure influence intentions to cross the road while distracted. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[37]  Simon Washington,et al.  Understanding the impacts of mobile phone distraction on driving performance: A systematic review , 2016 .

[38]  Changxu Wu,et al.  Traffic Safety for Electric Bike Riders in China , 2012 .

[39]  Guangnian Xiao,et al.  Evaluating passenger satisfaction index based on PLS-SEM model: Evidence from Chinese public transport service , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[40]  Linda Hill,et al.  Distracted driving behaviors related to cell phone use among middle-aged adults , 2015 .

[41]  H. Kaiser.  The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[42]  Hesamoddin Razi-Ardakani,et al.  Study on mobile phone use while driving in a sample of Iranian drivers , 2017, International journal of injury control and safety promotion.

[43]  J. Dórea,et al.  Child Nutritional Status in the Changing Socioeconomic Region of the Northern Amazon, Brazil , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[44]  G. Luria,et al.  The mediating role of smartphone addiction on the relationship between personality and young drivers' smartphone use while driving , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[45]  Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios,et al.  Getting away with texting: Behavioural adaptation of drivers engaging in visual-manual tasks while driving , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[46]  Torbjørn Rundmo,et al.  Cross-cultural comparisons of traffic safety, risk perception, attitudes and behaviour , 2009 .

[47]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[48]  James G. Phillips,et al.  Problematic Use of Mobile Phones in Australia…Is It Getting Worse? , 2019, Front. Psychiatry.

[49]  Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios,et al.  The effects of unhealthy lifestyle behaviours on risky riding behaviours – A study on app-based motorcycle taxi riders in Vietnam , 2020 .

[50]  Jing Feng,et al.  Risk Perceptions of Cellphone Use While Driving: Results from a Delphi Survey , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[51]  Katherine M. White,et al.  Young and connected: Psychological influences of mobile phone use amongst Australian youth , 2007 .

[52]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[53]  Xinping Yan,et al.  Safety of Public Transportation Occupational Drivers: Risk Perception, Attitudes, and Driving Behavior , 2010 .

[54]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[55]  L. Johnson,et al.  Effects of perceived safety, involvement and perceived service quality on loyalty intention among ride-sourcing passengers , 2019, Transportation.

[56]  P. Ulleberg,et al.  Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers , 2003 .

[57]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[58]  Erik Nelson,et al.  The effects of perception of risk and importance of answering and initiating a cellular phone call while driving. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[59]  J. Tudor-Owen.  The Importance of ‘Blue Shirts’ in Traffic Policing , 2019, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice.

[60]  L. Johnson,et al.  Factors influencing customer's loyalty towards ride-hailing taxi services – A case study of Vietnam , 2020, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[61]  Chris De Gruyter,et al.  Mobile phone use among motorcyclists and electric bike riders: A case study of Hanoi, Vietnam. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[62]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  Essentials of Business Research Methods , 2003 .

[63]  J. Davey,et al.  "I Snapchat and Drive!" A mixed methods approach examining snapchat use while driving and deterrent perceptions among young adults. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[64]  R. Sasikumar,et al.  Modeling safety risk perception due to mobile phone distraction among four wheeler drivers , 2017 .

[65]  Katherine M White,et al.  Dialling and driving: factors influencing intentions to use a mobile phone while driving. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[66]  James G. Phillips,et al.  Psychological Predictors of Problem Mobile Phone Use , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[67]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[68]  G. Rubio,et al.  Prevalence of problematic cell phone use in an adult population in Spain as assessed by the Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale (MPPUS) , 2017, PloS one.