Predictive models of weed population dynamics

Summary Many of the challenges faced by weed ecologists can be met only by the capability to predict the responses of weed populations to changes in their environment or management. In spite of this, a review of papers published in Weed Research suggests that weed ecologists are remarkably reluctant to produce detailed, quantitative predictions. This may result from uncertainty in the accuracy of predictions and indeed, a variety of reasons have been put forward to suggest that the potential utility of weed models may be limited in this regard. In this study, we review the applications to which weed models have been put. Focusing on predictive population modelling, we highlight several limitations that can lead to failures of this approach and we discuss the likely prospects for weed population modelling. We make three points regarding the future of weed modelling. First, owing to prohibitive data requirements, the development of highly mechanistic models that attempt to make detailed predictions of weed population numbers is unlikely to be very successful. Second, data collection for developing weed models needs to be rethought. Weed models are most commonly compromised by a lack of spatial and temporal replication, preventing modellers from measuring parameter variability and error effectively and limiting assessments of model uncertainty. Finally, the utility of models needs to be better appreciated; models are key tools in making long range predictions of how management will affect weed populations, but, we estimate, they are used in only a small fraction of studies. Without the further development of models for weed population dynamics, our ability to predict long-term dynamics will be restricted.

[1]  R. Freckleton,et al.  Predictions of biodiversity response to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. , 2000, Science.

[2]  Mike J. May,et al.  Management of genetically modified herbicide–tolerant sugar beet for spring and autumn environmental benefit , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Donald Ludwig,et al.  Uncertainty and the Assessment of Extinction Probabilities , 1996 .

[4]  L. R. Benjamin,et al.  An evaluation of four crop : weed competition models using a common data set , 2003 .

[5]  M. Rees,et al.  Biological control of Scotch broom : modelling the determinants of abundance and the potential impact of introduced insect herbivores , 1997 .

[6]  C. J. Doyle,et al.  A model of the economics of controlling Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. in winter wheat , 1986 .

[7]  Lawrence B. Slobodkin,et al.  A Critique for Ecology , 1991 .

[8]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Optimal release strategies for biological control agents: an application of stochastic dynamic programming to population management , 2000 .

[9]  R. Froud-Williams,et al.  Influence of Cultivation Regime Upon Buried Weed Seeds in Arable Cropping Systems , 1983 .

[10]  Robert M. May,et al.  Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications , 1981 .

[11]  W. van der Werf,et al.  Relative importance of vertebrates and invertebrates in epigeaic weed seed predation in organic cereal fields , 2003 .

[12]  Jonathan Gressel,et al.  Problems in qualifying and quantifying assumptions in plant protection models: Resultant simulations can be mistaken by a factor of million ☆ , 2005 .

[13]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Finding optimal control strategies for invasive species: a density‐structured model for Spartina alterniflora , 2004 .

[14]  R. Sheley,et al.  A model for predicting invasive weed and grass dynamics. I. Model development2 , 2005, Weed Science.

[15]  Roger D. Cousens,et al.  Can we determine the intrinsic dynamics of real plant populations , 1995 .

[16]  N. Colbach,et al.  How to model the effects of farming practices on weed emergence , 2005 .

[17]  R. Freckleton,et al.  Amelioration of biodiversity impacts of genetically modified crops: predicting transient versus long–term effects , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  S. Moss Weed research: is it delivering what it should? , 2008 .

[19]  R M May,et al.  Biological Populations with Nonoverlapping Generations: Stable Points, Stable Cycles, and Chaos , 1974, Science.

[20]  M. Nowakowski,et al.  The effect of arable field margin composition on invertebrate biodiversity , 2002 .

[21]  Marta Monjardino,et al.  RIM: a bioeconomic model for integrated weed management of Lolium rigidum in Western Australia , 2004 .

[22]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Modelling the effects of management on population dynamics: some lessons from annual weeds. , 2008 .

[23]  Edward C. Luschei,et al.  Research methodologies and statistical approaches for multitactic systems , 2005, Weed Science.

[24]  D. Ludwig,et al.  Ecology, Conservation, and Public Policy , 2001 .

[25]  D. Landis,et al.  Demographic models inform selection of biocontrol agents for garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata). , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[26]  C. J. Doyle,et al.  Mathematical models in weed management , 1991 .

[27]  Robert P. Freckleton,et al.  The population dynamics of Anisantha sterilis in winter wheat: comparative demography and the role of management , 1999 .

[28]  D. Ludwig Is it meaningful to estimate a probability of extinction , 1999 .

[29]  Randall E. Jones,et al.  Economic Thresholds and the Case for Longer Term Approaches to Population Management of Weeds1 , 2000, Weed Technology.

[30]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[31]  W. M. Lonsdale,et al.  Quantifying Uncertainty in Predictions of Invasiveness , 2006, Biological Invasions.

[32]  D. J. Webb,et al.  The dynamics of experimental arable weed communities under different management practices , 1996 .

[33]  N. Colbach,et al.  AlomySys: Modelling black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.) germination and emergence, in interaction with seed characteristics, tillage and soil climate: I. Construction , 2006 .

[34]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Predicting the ecological consequences of environmental change: a review of the methods* , 2006 .

[35]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Arable habitat use by wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). 2. Microhabitat , 2000 .

[36]  Nathalie Colbach,et al.  GENESYS : a model of the influence of cropping system on gene escape from herbicide tolerant rapeseed crops to rape volunteers. I. Temporal evolution of a population of rapeseed volunteers in a field , 2001 .

[37]  Edward C. Luschei,et al.  Justification for site-specific weed management based on ecology and economics , 2005, Weed Science.

[38]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Predicting the response of farmland bird populations to changing food supplies , 2003 .

[39]  R. Freckleton,et al.  How does temporal variability affect predictions of weed population numbers , 1998 .

[40]  R. Freckleton,et al.  Are weed population dynamics chaotic , 2002 .

[41]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Post‐war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain , 2002 .

[42]  Beatriz Arroyo,et al.  A review of the abundance and diversity of invertebrate and plant foods of granivorous birds in northern europe in relation to agricultural change , 1999 .

[43]  M. Rinella,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian methods estimate invasive weed impacts at pertinent spatial scales , 2007, Biological Invasions.

[44]  R. Sheley,et al.  A model for predicting invasive weed and grass dynamics. II. Accuracy evaluation2 , 2005, Weed Science.

[45]  Andrew R. Watkinson,et al.  Modelling the Population Dynamics of an Arable Weed and Its Effects Upon Crop Yield , 1986 .

[46]  Benjamin M. Bolker,et al.  Ecological Models and Data in R , 2008 .

[47]  Y. Buckley,et al.  Modelling integrated weed management of an invasive shrub in tropical Australia , 2004 .

[48]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[49]  D. Macdonald,et al.  The effects of arable field margin management on the abundance and species richness of Araneae (spiders) , 1998 .

[50]  Peter Müller,et al.  INCORPORATING MULTIPLE SOURCES OF STOCHASTICITY INTO DYNAMIC POPULATION MODELS , 2003 .

[51]  R. Freckleton,et al.  Predicting the determinants of weed abundance: a model for the population dynamics of Chenopodium album in sugar beet , 2008 .

[52]  M. J. Kropff,et al.  Modelling the effects of weeds on crop production , 1988 .

[53]  John Maynard Smith Models in ecology , 1974 .

[54]  Robert A. Robinson,et al.  The importance of arable habitat for farmland birds in grassland landscapes , 2001 .

[55]  A. Mead,et al.  MODELLING THE EMERGENCE RESPONSE OF WEED SEEDS TO BURIAL DEPTH: INTERACTIONS WITH SEED DENSITY, WEIGHT AND SHAPE , 2003 .

[56]  P. Duncan,et al.  Are European roe deer browsers ? A review of variations in the composition of their diets , 1996, Revue d'Écologie (La Terre et La Vie).

[57]  R. Medd,et al.  Economic analysis of integrated management of wild oats involving fallow, herbicide and crop rotational options , 1997 .

[58]  A R. Watkinson,et al.  Policy making within ecological uncertainty: lessons from badgers and GM crops. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[59]  Nathalie Colbach,et al.  Construction and evaluation of ALOMYSYS modelling the effects of cropping systems on the blackgrass life-cycle: From seedling to seed production , 2007 .

[60]  Niels Holst,et al.  Field weed population dynamics : a review of model approaches and applications , 2007 .