In the light of evolution V: Cooperation and conflict

This paper serves as an introduction to the fifth in a series of Colloquia under the general title “In the Light of Evolution” (ILE; see Box 1). Papers from the first four colloquia in the “In the Light of Evolution” series, titled “Adaptation and Complex Design,” “Biodiversity and Extinction,” “Two Centuries of Darwin,” and “The Human Condition,” are refs. 1⇓⇓–4, respectively. The current volume explores recent developments in the study of cooperation and conflict, ranging from the level of the gene to societies and symbioses. Box 1. In the Light of Evolution In 1973, Dobzhansky (5) penned a short commentary titled “Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution.” Most scientists agree that evolution provides the unifying framework for interpreting biological phenomena that otherwise can often seem unrelated and perhaps unintelligible. Given the central position of evolutionary thought in biology, it is sadly ironic that evolutionary perspectives outside the sciences have often been neglected, misunderstood, or purposefully misrepresented. Biodiversity—the genetic variety of life—is an exuberant product of the evolutionary past, a vast human-supportive resource (aesthetic, intellectual, and material) of the present, and a rich legacy to cherish and preserve for the future. Two challenges (as well as opportunities) for 21st century science are to gain deeper insights into the evolutionary processes that foster biotic diversity and to translate that understanding into workable solutions for the regional and global crises that biodiversity currently faces. A grasp of evolutionary principles and processes is important in other societal arenas as well, such as education, medicine, sociology, and other applied fields including agriculture, pharmacology, and biotechnology. The ramifications of evolutionary thought extend into learned realms traditionally reserved for philosophy and religion. The central goal of the “In the Light of Evolution” series is to promote the … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fjayala{at}uci.edu. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1

[1]  G. J. Velicer,et al.  Endemic social diversity within natural kin groups of a cooperative bacterium , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Dustin R. Rubenstein,et al.  Spatiotemporal environmental variation, risk aversion, and the evolution of cooperative breeding as a bet-hedging strategy , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Troy Day,et al.  The evolution of drug resistance and the curious orthodoxy of aggressive chemotherapy , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  J. Werren Selfish genetic elements, genetic conflict, and evolutionary innovation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  B. Crespi,et al.  Pathology from evolutionary conflict, with a theory of X chromosome versus autosome conflict over sexually antagonistic traits , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  P. Nonacs Kinship, greenbeards, and runaway social selection in the evolution of social insect cooperation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  B. Strassmann Cooperation and competition in a cliff-dwelling people , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Joel L. Sachs,et al.  Evolutionary transitions in bacterial symbiosis , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Evolution of cooperation and control of cheating in a social microbe , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Sara Mitri,et al.  Social evolution in multispecies biofilms , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Gene E Robinson,et al.  Molecular evolutionary analyses of insect societies , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  D. Queller,et al.  Expanded social fitness and Hamilton's rule for kin, kith, and kind , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Joshua R. Nahum,et al.  Evolution of restraint in a structured rock–paper–scissors community , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  J. Silk,et al.  Evolutionary foundations of human prosocial sentiments , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  D. Haig Genomic imprinting and the evolutionary psychology of human kinship , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  D. Cheney Extent and limits of cooperation in animals , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  J. Henrich,et al.  The cultural niche: Why social learning is essential for human adaptation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Stuart A. West,et al.  Promiscuity and the evolutionary transition to complex societies , 2010, Nature.

[19]  F. Ayala,et al.  In the light of evolution IV: The human condition , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  J. Strassmann,et al.  THE SOCIAL ORGANISM: CONGRESSES, PARTIES, AND COMMITTEES , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Beyond society: the evolution of organismality , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  M. Vos,et al.  Sociobiology of the myxobacteria. , 2009, Annual review of microbiology.

[23]  F. Ayala,et al.  In the light of evolution III: Two centuries of Darwin , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  R. Lenski,et al.  Experimental evolution of a microbial predator's ability to find prey , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  F. Ayala,et al.  In the light of evolution II: Biodiversity and extinction , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Anup Parikh,et al.  Facultative cheater mutants reveal the genetic complexity of cooperation in social amoebae , 2008, Nature.

[27]  A. Griffin,et al.  The Social Lives of Microbes , 2007 .

[28]  F. Ayala,et al.  In the light of evolution I: Adaptation and complex design , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  A. Cockburn Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  R. Gadagkar Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution , 2005 .

[31]  G. J. Velicer,et al.  Exploitative and Hierarchical Antagonism in a Cooperative Bacterium , 2005, PLoS biology.

[32]  Kevin R Foster,et al.  Hamiltonian Medicine: Why the Social Lives of Pathogens Matter , 2005, Science.

[33]  R. Koch,et al.  Ueber den augenblicklichen Stand der bakteriologischen Choleradiagnose , 1893, Zeitschrift für Hygiene und Infektionskrankheiten.

[34]  M. Riley,et al.  Bacteriocins: evolution, ecology, and application. , 2002, Annual review of microbiology.

[35]  R. Kessin Dictyostelium: Evolution, Cell Biology, and the Development of Multicellularity , 2001 .

[36]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[37]  D. Haig,et al.  Genetic Conflicts in Human Pregnancy , 1993, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[38]  George C. Williams,et al.  The Dawn of Darwinian Medicine , 1991, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[39]  L. Buss,et al.  The evolution of individuality , 1987 .

[40]  Richard D. Alexander,et al.  Darwinism and human affairs , 1979 .

[41]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[42]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.