Differences in Thematic Map Reading by Students and Their Geography Teacher

A school world atlas is likely the first systematic cartographic product which students encounter in their lives. However, only a few empirical studies have analysed school atlases in the context of map reading and learning geographical curricula. The present paper describes an eye-tracking study conducted on 30 grammar school students and their geography teacher. The study explored ten tasks using thematic world maps contained in the Czech school world atlas. Three research questions were posed: (i) Are students able to learn using these particular types of maps? (ii) Have the cartographic visualization methods in the school atlas been adequately selected? (iii) Does the teacher read the maps in the same manner as students? The results proved that the students were sufficiently able to learn using thematic maps. The average correctness of their answers exceeded 70%. However, the results highlighted several types of cartographic visualization methods which students found difficult to read. Most of the difficulties arose from map symbols being poorly legible. The most problematic task was estimating the value of the phenomenon from the symbol size legend. Finally, the difference between the students’ and teacher’s manner of reading maps in each task was analysed qualitatively and then quantitatively by applying two different scanpath comparison methods. The study revealed that the geography teacher applied a different method than her students. She avoided looking at the map legend and solved the task using her knowledge.

[1]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  OGAMA (Open Gaze and Mouse Analyzer): Open-source software designed to analyze eye and mouse movements in slideshow study designs , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[2]  M. Hanus,et al.  Map skills in Czech and foreign curricula: a comparative study , 2013 .

[3]  Gaea Leinhardt,et al.  Maps as Representations: Expert Novice Comparison of Projection Understanding , 2002 .

[4]  Joel L. Morrison,et al.  Towards a Functional Definition of the Science of Cartography with Emphasis on Map Reading , 1978 .

[5]  Lilliam Sofía Gómez Solórzano,et al.  Atlas Design: A Usability Approach for the Development and Evaluation of Cartographic Products , 2017 .

[6]  Map skills and geographical knowledge , 1994 .

[7]  Steven J. Landry,et al.  An Eye Movement Analysis Algorithm for a Multielement Target Tracking Task: Maximum Transition-Based Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[8]  Kristien Ooms,et al.  Accuracy and precision of fixation locations recorded with the low-cost Eye Tribe tracker in different experimental set- ups , 2015 .

[9]  W. Żyszkowska.  Map perception: theories and research in the second half of the twentieth century , 2015 .

[10]  Gwyneth A. Lewis,et al.  Autonomic Nervous System Correlates of Speech Categorization Revealed Through Pupillometry , 2020, Frontiers in Neuroscience.

[11]  P. Thorndyke,et al.  Individual differences in procedures for knowledge acquisition from maps , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  T. Foulsham,et al.  It depends on how you look at it: Scanpath comparison in multiple dimensions with MultiMatch, a vector-based approach , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[13]  Edwin S. Dalmaijer,et al.  Is the low-cost EyeTribe eye tracker any good for research? , 2014 .

[14]  Marco Pollanen,et al.  Problem Solving as a Path to Comprehension , 2020, Math. Comput. Sci..

[15]  C. Board.  MAP READING TASKS APPROPRIATE IN EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES IN CARTOGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION , 1978 .

[16]  Izabela Gołębiowska,et al.  Legend Layouts for Thematic Maps: A Case Study Integrating Usability Metrics with the Thinking Aloud Method , 2015 .

[17]  Arzu Çöltekin,et al.  An empirical assessment of the impact of the light direction on the relief inversion effect in shaded relief maps: NNW is better than NW , 2017 .

[18]  A. Vondráková,et al.  USER PREFERENCES IN IMAGE MAP USING , 2016 .

[19]  S. Popelka,et al.  STUDENTS’ ABILITY TO WORK WITH GRAPHS IN PHYSICS STUDIES RELATED TO THREE TYPICAL STUDENT GROUPS , 2020, Journal of Baltic Science Education.

[20]  M. Hanus,et al.  What does a map-skills-test tell us about Czech pupils? , 2016 .

[21]  Karel Jedlicka,et al.  User Evaluation of Map-Based Visual Analytic Tools , 2019, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[22]  Judy M. Olson.  A Coordinated Approach to Map Communication Improvement , 1976 .

[23]  Evanthia C. Michaelidou,et al.  The Ability of Elementary School Children to Analyse General Reference and Thematic Maps , 2004, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[24]  Bradley Wade Bishop,et al.  Usability of E-government mapping applications: lessons learned from the US National Atlas , 2015 .

[25]  Arzu Çöltekin,et al.  Exploring the efficiency of users' visual analytics strategies based on sequence analysis of eye movement recordings , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[26]  The Effect of Student Freedom of Choice in Learning Map Skills , 1999 .

[27]  B. Juhász,et al.  Hungarian survey on the use of cartograms in school cartography , 2015 .

[28]  Yang Yu,et al.  Adaptability of atlas symbol sizes under multivariate conditions , 2020, Cartography and Geographic Information Science.

[29]  P. Branscum,et al.  CrossFit Athletic Identity’s Relationship to Sponsor Recall, Recognition, and Purchase Intent , 2019, International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science.

[30]  P. Maeyer,et al.  Study of the attentive behavior of novice and expert map users using eye tracking , 2014 .

[31]  Zhilin Li,et al.  Effectiveness of Cartogram for the Representation of Spatial Data , 2010 .

[32]  Martin Hanus,et al.  The Impact of Map Type on the Level of Student Map Skills , 2018, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[33]  Stanislav Popelka,et al.  Evaluation of the Cartographical Quality of Urban Plans by Eye-Tracking , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[34]  Lukás Herman,et al.  Evaluation of User Performance in Interactive and Static 3D Maps , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[36]  Michael Burch,et al.  Visual Analytics Methodology for Eye Movement Studies , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[37]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  How Cognitive Maps are Learned and Remembered , 1996 .

[38]  Marcus Nyström,et al.  Cartographic Design Matters – A Comparison of Thematic Polygon Design , 2016 .

[39]  Stefan Wrobel,et al.  Visual analytics tools for analysis of movement data , 2007, SKDD.

[40]  Zdeněk Stachoň,et al.  Cartographic Design and Usability of Visual Variables for Linear Features , 2016 .

[41]  Linda W. Pickle,et al.  A Cognitive Subtask Model of Statistical Map Reading , 1996 .

[42]  Stanislav Popelka,et al.  EyeTribe Tracker Data Accuracy Evaluation and Its Interconnection with Hypothesis Software for Cartographic Purposes , 2016, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[43]  Frank Witlox,et al.  Interpreting maps through the eyes of expert and novice users , 2012, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[44]  Stanislav Popelka,et al.  ScanGraph: A Novel Scanpath Comparison Method Using Visualisation of Graph Cliques , 2016 .

[45]  Lenka Havelková,et al.  What Went Wrong for Bad Solvers during Thematic Map Analysis? Lessons Learned from an Eye-Tracking Study , 2020, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[46]  A. Koláčný.  Cartographic Information—a Fundamental Concept and Term in Modern Cartography , 1969 .

[47]  Yaroslav O. Halchenko,et al.  multimatch-gaze: The MultiMatch algorithm for gaze path comparison in Python , 2019, J. Open Source Softw..

[48]  Katarzyna Słomska.  Types of maps used as a stimuli in cartographical empirical research , 2018, Miscellanea Geographica.

[49]  J. Morrison.  The Science of Cartography and Its Essential Processes , 1977 .

[50]  Paul R. Kinnear,et al.  Skill in Map Reading and Memory for Maps , 1988 .

[51]  Siliang Tang,et al.  Using Eye Tracking to Explore the Impacts of Geography Courses on Map-based Spatial Ability , 2018, Sustainability.