Learning management systems and their impact on academic work

ABSTRACT Enterprise-wide, repository-based, ubiquitously available, socially oriented technologies such as learning management systems (LMSs) and virtual learning environments are altering the nature of institutional teaching and learning processes. These technology-induced changes are likely in turn to have an impact on the work experience of academics. This article qualitatively examines the impact of LMSs on several important academic relationships: with students, with colleagues, with the institution itself and with home. The research found that academics mainly used LMSs as repositories of materials with some additional use for managing assessment; however, they made little use of communication, administration or monitoring features. Academics used LMSs in ways and for purposes that suited themselves: use of LMSs has not changed teaching habits or approaches. Academics were not concerned about the impact of the technology on home–life or work–life balance. Academics reported little concern about intellectual property but nevertheless took measures to protect teaching materials.

[1]  J. Creswell Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[2]  Donald R. Cooper,et al.  Business Research Methods , 1980 .

[3]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[4]  A. King From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side , 1993 .

[5]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[6]  Paul Michael Privateer,et al.  Academic Technology and the Future of Higher Education: Strategic Paths Taken and Not Taken , 1999 .

[7]  Dirk Van Damme,et al.  Quality issues in the internationalisation of higher education , 2001 .

[8]  Lee D. Parker,et al.  It’s been a pleasure doing business with you: a strategic analysis and critique of university change management , 2002 .

[9]  S. Laverty Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Phenomenology: A Comparison of Historical and Methodological Considerations , 2003 .

[10]  D. Garrison,et al.  Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[11]  H. Coates,et al.  A Critical Examination Of The Effects Of Learning Management Systems On University Teaching And Learning , 2005 .

[12]  Wendy L. Cukier,et al.  Is mobile email functional or dysfunctional? Two perspectives on mobile email usage , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Mehmet Akif Ocak,et al.  FACULTY ADOPTION OF ONLINE TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION , 2006 .

[14]  Gina Anderson,et al.  Carving out time and space in the managerial university , 2006 .

[15]  Nia Love,et al.  Accounting students' perceptions of a virtual learning environment: Springboard or safety net? , 2006 .

[16]  Luigi Proserpio,et al.  Teaching the Virtual Generation. , 2007 .

[17]  Julie B. Olson-Buchanan,et al.  The Use of Communication Technologies After Hours: The Role of Work Attitudes and Work-Life Conflict , 2007 .

[18]  Janice Newson,et al.  No Time to Think , 2007 .

[19]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Understanding the experiences of instructors as they adopt a course management system , 2007 .

[20]  Maarten De Laat,et al.  'Disruptive technologies', 'pedagogical innovation': What's new Findings from an in-depth study of students' use and perception of technology , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Martin Mulder,et al.  Determining factors of the use of e-learning environments by university teachers , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[22]  H. Kanuka,et al.  Exploring amplifications and reductions associated with e‐learning: conversations with leaders of e‐learning programs , 2008 .

[23]  Françoise Blin,et al.  Why hasn't technology disrupted academics' teaching practices Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Deanna Geddes,et al.  How Am I Doing? Exploring On-Line Gradebook Monitoring as a Self-Regulated Learning Practice That Impacts Academic Achievement , 2009 .

[25]  Steven Lonn,et al.  Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of Learning Management Systems , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Terry T. Kidd Butterfly under a pin: Exploring the voices and stories told of faculty who adopt ICT’s for teaching and learning practices , 2009, Education and Information Technologies.

[27]  N. Pliskin,et al.  Student LMS use and satisfaction in academic institutions: The organizational perspective , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[28]  David C. Chou,et al.  Course Management Systems and Blended Learning: An Innovative Learning Approach. , 2011 .

[29]  Stephen R. Barley,et al.  E-mail as a Source and Symbol of Stress , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Michael C. Cant,et al.  Adopting learning technologies: from belief to practice , 2011 .

[31]  Laurence Habib,et al.  Virtual learning environments as sociomaterial agents in the network of teaching practice , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Winning the Race With Ever-Smarter Machines , 2012 .

[33]  Malcolm Brady Multiple roles of student and instructor in university teaching and learning processes , 2013 .

[34]  Tom Buchanan,et al.  Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: implications for models of technology adoption , 2013, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[35]  Helen Lentell Invasion of the MOOCs: the promise and perils of massive open and online courses , 2014 .

[36]  Kristine Dery,et al.  Working with connective flow: how smartphone use is evolving in practice , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Craig Prichard,et al.  Introduction: What have we done with Higher Education? , 2014 .

[38]  Stephen Jackson,et al.  Exploring the role and influence of expectations in achieving VLE benefit success , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[39]  J. B. Arbaugh,et al.  What Might Online Delivery Teach Us About Blended Management Education? Prior Perspectives and Future Directions , 2014 .

[40]  Martin Parker,et al.  University, Ltd: Changing a business school , 2014 .

[41]  Judit T. Nagy Using learning management systems in business and economics studies in Hungarian higher education , 2014, Education and Information Technologies.

[42]  Judith Schoonenboom,et al.  Using an adapted, task-level technology acceptance model to explain why instructors in higher education intend to use some learning management system tools more than others , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[43]  H. Salah Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five approaches (3e éd.). London : Sage. , 2015 .

[44]  Monideepa Tarafdar,et al.  The dark side of information technology , 2015 .

[45]  Chang Zhu Organisational culture and technology-enhanced innovation in higher education , 2015 .

[46]  Andy Cramp,et al.  Meaningful dialogue in digitally mediated learning for in-service teacher development , 2015 .

[47]  Susan McNaughton,et al.  Resituation or resistance? Higher education teachers’ adaptations to technological change , 2015 .

[48]  Richard Walker,et al.  Charting the development of technology-enhanced learning developments across the UK higher education sector: a longitudinal perspective (2001–2012) , 2016, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[49]  Judit T. Nagy Using learning management systems in business and economics studies in Hungarian higher education , 2016 .

[50]  N. Selwyn Digital downsides: exploring university students’ negative engagements with digital technology , 2016 .

[51]  Leonard Holmes If It Moves, Measure It: Taylor’s Impact on UK Higher Education , 2016 .

[52]  Chris Shelton,et al.  Giving up technology and social media: why university lecturers stop using technology in teaching , 2017 .

[53]  Richard Walker,et al.  The rhetoric and reality of technology-enhanced learning developments in UK higher education: reflections on recent UCISA research findings (2012–2016) , 2018, Interact. Learn. Environ..