Strategic action generation: A comparison of emphasis placed on generic competitive methods by U.S. And Japanese managers

The paper identifies similarities and differences in the emphases and patterns that U.S. and Japanese managers attribute to a set of 22 generic competitive methods. It highlights the different ways that Japanese and American managers combine these methods to form general business strategies. Using factor analyses and smallest space analyses, the study shows differences in business strategy patterns between managers in Japan and the U.S. Such differences reflect the organizing principles underlying the strategy approaches in U.S. and Japanese firms. The organizing principle underlying U.S. responses is the desire to find way to differentiate a firm from its competitors. In contrast, the organizing principle underlying Japanese responses is a desire to establish a comprehensive, stable and defensible position. The paper discusses the implications of these results for strategic management and suggests directions for future U.S. and Japanese comparative strategy research.

[1]  Richard Tanner Pascale,et al.  Communication and Decision Making across Cultures: Japanese and American Comparisons. , 1978 .

[2]  Lawrence G. Franko,et al.  Global corporate competition: Who's winning, who's losing, and the R&D factor as one reason why , 1989 .

[3]  Bruce Kogut,et al.  Country capabilities and the permeability of borders , 1991 .

[4]  R. Jaikumar.  Postindustrial manufacturing , 1986 .

[5]  L. Guttman.  A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points , 1968 .

[6]  Robert A. Burgelman.  A Comparative Evolutionary Perspective on Strategy-Making: Advantages and Limitations of the Japanese Approach , 1988 .

[7]  Norman P. Smothers,et al.  Patterns of japanese strategy: Strategic combinations of strategies , 1990 .

[8]  Marilyn R. Zuckerman.  Incredibly American: Releasing the Heart of Quality , 1992 .

[9]  M. Hitt,et al.  Industrial Firms' Grand Strategy and Functional Importance: Moderating Effects of Technology and Uncertainty , 1982 .

[10]  David A. Garvin,et al.  Quality Problems, Policies, and Attitudes in the United States and Japan: An Exploratory Study , 1986 .

[11]  Henry Mintzberg.  The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management , 1990 .

[12]  Yasunori Baba,et al.  The dynamics of continuous innovation in scale‐intensive industries , 1989 .

[13]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Managing Culture as a Competitive Resource: An Identity-Based View of Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[14]  K. Clark,et al.  Dynamic Manufacturing: Creating the Learning Organization , 1988 .

[15]  Tomasz Mroczkowski,et al.  Continuity and Change in Japanese Management , 1989 .

[16]  A. Huff,et al.  STRATEGIC GROUPS: A COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE , 1993 .

[17]  Kiyohiko Ito,et al.  R&D spending, domestic competition, and export performance of Japanese manufacturing firms , 1993 .

[18]  S. Shortell,et al.  Perceptual and archival measures of Miles and Snow's strategic types: a comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity. , 1990, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[19]  W. Ouchi,et al.  Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge. , 1981 .

[20]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  Strategic vs. Evolutionary Management: A U.S.-Japan Comparison of Strategy and Organization. , 1987 .

[21]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[22]  Kenichi Ohmae,et al.  The mind of a strategist , 2006 .

[23]  James R. Lincoln,et al.  Organizational Structures in Japanese and U.S. Manufacturing , 1986 .

[24]  Jeffrey Miller,et al.  Flexibility: The Next Competitive Battle: The Manufacturing Futures Survey , 1989 .

[25]  A. Jaeger,et al.  Control systems and strategic adaptation: Lessons from the Japanese experience , 1985 .

[26]  Louis Guttman,et al.  The Guttman-Lingoes nonmetric program series , 1973 .

[27]  James C. Abegglen.  The Japanese factory : aspects of its social organization , 1958 .