A Decade of Distraction? How Multitasking Affects Student Outcomes

The proliferation and ease of access to information and communication technologies (ICTs) such as Facebook, text messaging, and instant messaging has resulted in ICT users being presented with more real-time streaming data than ever before. Unfortunately, this has also resulted in individuals increasingly engaging in multitasking as an information management strategy. The purpose of this study was to examine how college students multitask with ICTs and to determine the impacts of this multitasking on their college GPA. Using web survey data from a large sample of college students at one university (N=1,839), we found that students reported spending a large amount of time using ICTs on a daily basis. Students reported frequently searching for content not related to courses, using Facebook, emailing, talking on their cell phones, and texting while doing schoolwork. Hierarchical (blocked) linear regression analyses revealed that using Facebook and texting while doing schoolwork were negatively associated with overall college GPA. Conversely, emailing was positively associated with college GPA. Engaging in Facebook use or texting while trying to complete schoolwork may tax students’ capacity for cognitive processing and preclude deeper learning, while emailing may be directly related to learning. Our research indicates that the type and purpose of ICT use matters in terms of the educational impacts of multitasking.

[1]  Andrew K. Shenton.  Use of school resource centre-based computers in leisure time by teenage pupils , 2008, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  J. Cooper,et al.  Gender and computers : understanding the digital divide , 2003 .

[4]  Frank Drews,et al.  Profiles in Driver Distraction: Effects of Cell Phone Conversations on Younger and Older Drivers , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Frank Drews,et al.  Text Messaging During Simulated Driving , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[6]  Lindsay Fullerton,et al.  Trust Online: Young Adults' Evaluation of Web Content , 2010 .

[7]  D. Strayer,et al.  Passenger and Cell-Phone Conversations in Simulated Driving , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[8]  Julie D. Golomb,et al.  A taxonomy of external and internal attention. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  V. Rideout,et al.  Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds , 2010 .

[10]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Succinct Survey Measures of Web-Use Skills , 2012 .

[11]  S. Cotten,et al.  Technological Influences on Social Ties Across the Lifespan , 2010 .

[12]  M. Deberard,et al.  Predictors of Academic Achievement and Retention among College Freshmen: A Longitudinal Study. , 2004 .

[13]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Survey Measures of Web-Oriented Digital Literacy , 2005 .

[14]  Reynol Junco,et al.  Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  E. Hargittai.  Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the “Net Generation”* , 2010 .

[16]  Reynol Junco,et al.  The Effect of Gender, Ethnicity, and Income on College Students' Use of Communication Technologies , 2010, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[17]  A. Willford.  Secondary School Course Grades and Success in College. , 2009 .

[18]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use , 2004 .

[19]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[20]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Volume 2. , 2005 .

[21]  Michael Vorländer,et al.  Switching in the cocktail party: exploring intentional control of auditory selective attention. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Shelia R. Cotten,et al.  Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Gail Salaway,et al.  The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2008 , 2007 .

[24]  Christopher L. Asplund,et al.  A Unified attentional bottleneck in the human brain , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Despina Stavrinos,et al.  Distracted walking: cell phones increase injury risk for college pedestrians. , 2011, Journal of safety research.

[26]  E. Hargittai.  The Digital Reproduction of Inequality , 2008 .

[27]  R. Marois,et al.  Capacity limits of information processing in the brain , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.