A new methodology to study the pantograph–catenary dynamics in curved railway tracks

The pantograph–catenary system is responsible to provide an uninterrupted energy supply to power electric traction railway vehicles. The analysis of the dynamic behaviour of the catenary and pantograph, as well as its interaction, has been the objective of active research to improve energy collection quality. This work proposes an approach for the fully three-dimensional dynamic analysis of pantograph–catenary interaction in general railway tracks including curves. The catenary model and the trajectory of the pantograph base are defined with respect to the track geometry considering the conventional definition used by the rail industry, i.e. the track curvature, cross-level and vertical position. The pantograph is modelled using a multibody formulation being its base motion constrained to follow the generalised trajectory from the railway vehicle roof. The finite element method is used to model the catenary. A co-simulation procedure is set to establish the coupled dynamics of the two systems. In order to demonstrate the methodology, setup models for curved catenaries, analyse modelling implications and highlight applicability, realistic case studies of pantograph–catenary interaction in high-speed rail operations are presented and discussed. In the process, significant differences are found in the dynamic response of the catenary in curved and straight tracks.

[1]  Stefano Bruni,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Pantograph-Overhead Equipment Interaction , 2002 .

[2]  Weihua Zhang,et al.  A hybrid method to simulate the interaction of pantograph and catenary on overlap span , 2006 .

[3]  J. S. Przemieniecki.  Theory of matrix structural analysis , 1985 .

[4]  Franklin Farell.  Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area: Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system , 2014 .

[5]  Petter Nåvik,et al.  Identification of system damping in railway catenary wire systems from full-scale measurements , 2016 .

[6]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  Improved bushing models for general multibody systems and vehicle dynamics , 2009 .

[7]  Stefano Bruni,et al.  Special issue on the pantograph–catenary interaction benchmark , 2015 .

[8]  Petter Nåvik,et al.  Dynamic assessment of existing soft catenary systems using modal analysis to explore higher train velocities: a case study of a Norwegian contact line system , 2015 .

[9]  William C. Iverson.  Analysis of the Reconstruction of Rail Geometry from Curvature Data , 1974 .

[10]  Joao Pombo,et al.  A Comparative Study between Two Pantographs in Multiple Pantograph High-Speed Operations , 2013 .

[11]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Pantograph/Catenary Contact Formulations , 2017 .

[12]  Rainer Puschmann,et al.  Contact Lines for Electric Railways: Planning, Design, Implementation, Maintenance , 2001 .

[13]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  Influence of pantograph suspension characteristics on the contact quality with the catenary for high speed trains , 2012 .

[14]  Stefano Bruni,et al.  Numerical and Hardware-In-the-Loop Tools for the Design of Very High Speed Pantograph-Catenary Systems , 2012 .

[15]  Lars Drugge,et al.  Study of Critical Sections in Catenary Systems During Multiple Pantograph Operation , 2005 .

[16]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  Optimization of high-speed railway pantographs for improving pantograph-catenary contact , 2013 .

[17]  L. W.,et al.  The Theory of Sound , 1898, Nature.

[18]  C. W. Gear,et al.  Simultaneous Numerical Solution of Differential-Algebraic Equations , 1971 .

[19]  B. Schweizer,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Cosimulation Methods: Stability and Convergence Analysis for Different Solver Coupling Approaches , 2015 .

[20]  Petter Nåvik,et al.  Variation in predicting pantograph–catenary interaction contact forces, numerical simulations and field measurements , 2017 .

[21]  C. Esveld.  Modern railway track , 1989 .

[22]  Etienne Balmes,et al.  Introduction of variability into pantograph–catenary dynamic simulations , 2014 .

[23]  H. Saunders,et al.  Finite element procedures in engineering analysis , 1982 .

[24]  Fujio Yamaguchi,et al.  Curves and Surfaces in Computer Aided Geometric Design , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[25]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  Influence of the aerodynamic forces on the pantograph–catenary system for high-speed trains , 2009 .

[26]  Parviz E. Nikravesh,et al.  Computer-aided analysis of mechanical systems , 1988 .

[27]  W. Kortüm,et al.  Pantograph/Catenary Dynamics and Control , 1997 .

[28]  Bernd Simeon,et al.  Modelling and simulation of railway cable systems , 2005 .

[29]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  A Memory Based Communication in the Co-simulation of Multibody and Finite Element Codes for Pantograph-Catenary Interaction Simulation , 2009 .

[30]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  Dynamic Analysis of the Pantograph-Cantenary, Interaction on Overlap Sections for High-Speed Railway Operations , 2014 .

[31]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  General Spatial Curve Joint for Rail Guided Vehicles: Kinematics and Dynamics , 2003 .

[32]  Theodore G. Toridis,et al.  Computer analysis of rigid frames , 1971 .

[33]  Stefan Jakubek,et al.  Catenary emulation for hardware-in-the-loop pantograph testing with a model predictive energy-conserving control algorithm , 2017 .

[34]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  Modelling tracks for roller coaster dynamics , 2007 .

[35]  Klaas Hofstra.  THE EUROPEAN RAIL RESEARCH ADVISORY COUNCIL (ERRAC): DEFINING THE STRATEGIC RAIL RESEARCH AGENDA FOR 2020 , 2002 .

[36]  Alberto Carnicero López,et al.  Influence of track irregularities in the catenary-pantograph dynamic interaction , 2012 .

[37]  Yang Song,et al.  Nonlinear analysis of wind-induced vibration of high-speed railway catenary and its influence on pantograph–catenary interaction , 2016 .

[38]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  PantoCat statement of method , 2015 .

[39]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  Environmental and track perturbations on multiple pantograph interaction with catenaries in high-speed trains , 2013 .

[40]  S. Gregori,et al.  An approach to geometric optimisation of railway catenaries , 2018 .

[41]  Zheng-Dong Ma,et al.  A Gluing Algorithm for Distributed Simulation of Multibody Systems , 2003 .

[42]  P. L. Wong,et al.  Wear of pantograph collector strips , 2008 .

[43]  Michael E. Mortenson,et al.  Geometric Modeling , 2008, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[44]  Mitsuru Ikeda,et al.  The results of the pantograph–catenary interaction benchmark , 2015 .

[45]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Introduction to Optimum Design , 1988 .

[46]  Luis Baeza,et al.  A 3D absolute nodal coordinate finite element model to compute the initial configuration of a railway catenary , 2014 .

[47]  P. Flores.  Kinematics and Dynamics of Multibody Systems with Imperfect Joints: Models and Case Studies , 2008 .

[48]  Giuseppe Bucca,et al.  Adoption of different pantographs’ preloads to improve multiple collection and speed up existing lines , 2012 .

[49]  John McPhee,et al.  Parameter identification in dynamic systems using the homotopy optimization approach , 2011 .

[50]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  Recent Developments in Pantograph-Catenary Interaction Modelling and Analysis , 2012 .

[51]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  A COMPUTATIONAL PROCEDURE FOR THE DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF THE CATENARY-PANTOGRAPH INTERACTION IN HIGH-SPEED TRAINS , 2012 .

[52]  Sebastian Stichel,et al.  Implications of the operation of multiple pantographs on the soft catenary systems in Sweden , 2016 .

[53]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  On the Requirements of Interpolating Polynomials for Path Motion Constraints , 2015 .

[54]  Joao Pombo,et al.  Contact Model for The Pantograph-Catenary Interaction * , 2007 .

[55]  Stefano Bruni,et al.  Hardware-in-the-loop hybrid simulation of pantograph–catenary interaction , 2012 .