Labels as Features (Not Names) for Infant Categorization: A Neurocomputational Approach

A substantial body of experimental evidence has demonstrated that labels have an impact on infant categorization processes. Yet little is known regarding the nature of the mechanisms by which this effect is achieved. We distinguish between two competing accounts: supervised name-based categorization and unsupervised feature-based categorization. We describe a neurocomputational model of infant visual categorization, based on self-organizing maps, that implements the unsupervised feature-based approach. The model successfully reproduces experiments demonstrating the impact of labeling on infant visual categorization reported in Plunkett, Hu, and Cohen (2008). It mimics infant behavior in both the familiarization and testing phases of the procedure, using a training regime that involves only single presentations of each stimulus and using just 24 participant networks per experiment. The model predicts that the observed behavior in infants is due to a transient form of learning that might lead to the emergence of hierarchically organized categorical structure and that the impact of labels on categorization is influenced by the perceived similarity and the sequence in which the objects are presented. The results suggest that early in development, say before 12 months old, labels need not act as invitations to form categories nor highlight the commonalities between objects, but they may play a more mundane but nevertheless powerful role as additional features that are processed in the same fashion as other features that characterize objects and object categories.

[1]  Chris Sinha,et al.  Symbol Grounding or the Emergence of Symbols? Vocabulary Growth in Children and a Connectionist Net , 1992 .

[2]  Christopher W. Robinson,et al.  Auditory dominance and its change in the course of development. , 2004, Child development.

[3]  B. Roder,et al.  Infants' Preferences for Familiarity and Novelty During the Course of Visual Processing. , 2000, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[4]  Anne L. Fulkerson,et al.  Words (but not Tones) facilitate object categorization: Evidence from 6- and 12-month-olds , 2007, Cognition.

[5]  D. Mareschal,et al.  From Parts to Wholes: Mechanisms of Development in Infant Visual Object Processing. , 2004, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[6]  V. Marchman,et al.  U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perception: Implications for child language acquisition , 1991, Cognition.

[7]  L B Cohen,et al.  Developmental change in infants' perception of correlations among attributes. , 1986, Child development.

[8]  Lisa M. Oakes,et al.  Early Category and Concept Development: Making Sense of the Blooming, Buzzing Confusion , 2008 .

[9]  Denis Mareschal,et al.  Mechanisms of Categorization in Infancy. , 2000, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[10]  David R. Shanks,et al.  A unitary signal-detection model of implicit and explicit memory , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Physiological interpretationm of the self-organizing map algorithm , 1993 .

[12]  B. Younger The segregation of items into categories by ten-month-old infants. , 1985, Child development.

[13]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[14]  Ping Li,et al.  Dynamic Self-Organization and Early Lexical Development in Children , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  L B Cohen,et al.  Developmental changes in infant visual preferences for novelty and familiarity. , 1973, Child development.

[16]  Sandra R. Waxman,et al.  Consistent (but not variable) names as invitations to form object categories: new evidence from 12-month-old infants , 2005, Cognition.

[17]  Sandra R. Waxman,et al.  Specifying the scope of 13-month-olds' expectations for novel words , 1999, Cognition.

[18]  Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  The birth of words: ten-month-olds learn words through perceptual salience. , 2006, Child development.

[19]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organization and Associative Memory , 1988 .

[20]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  Charles Spence,et al.  Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[22]  Michael McCloskey,et al.  Catastrophic Interference in Connectionist Networks: The Sequential Learning Problem , 1989 .

[23]  R. L. Fantz Visual Experience in Infants: Decreased Attention to Familiar Patterns Relative to Novel Ones , 1964, Science.

[24]  A. Markman,et al.  Inference using categories. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  F. Colavita Human sensory dominance , 1974 .

[26]  Alan Slater,et al.  Intermodal perception at birth: Intersensory redundancy guides newborn infants’ learning of arbitrary auditory−visual pairings , 1999 .

[27]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Some Beginnings of Word Comprehension in 6-Month-Olds , 1999 .

[28]  L. Cohen,et al.  Labels can override perceptual categories in early infancy , 2008, Cognition.

[29]  G. Schafer,et al.  Infants can learn decontextualized words before their first birthday. , 2005, Child development.

[30]  Francis Crick,et al.  The recent excitement about neural networks , 1989, Nature.

[31]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Physiological interpretation of the Self-Organizing Map algorithm , 1993, Neural Networks.

[32]  H. Offret Computational Maps in the Visual Cortex , 2006 .

[33]  J. Bertoncini,et al.  Before and after the vocabulary spurt: two modes of word acquisition? , 2003 .

[34]  Domenico Parisi,et al.  LANGUAGE AS AN AID TO CATEGORIZATION: A NEURAL NETWORK MODEL OF EARLY LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2005 .

[35]  P. Sneath The application of computers to taxonomy. , 1957, Journal of general microbiology.

[36]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  WHAT'S IN A WORD? ON THE CHILD'S ACQUISITION OF SEMANTICS IN HIS FIRST LANGUAGE , 1973 .

[37]  R. French Catastrophic Forgetting in Connectionist Networks , 2006 .

[38]  K. Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  The eyes have it: lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm , 1987, Journal of Child Language.

[39]  Barbara A. Younger,et al.  Developmental change in infants' perception of correlations among attributes. , 1986, Child development.

[40]  S. Waxman Links between object categorization and naming: Origins and emergence in human infants , 2003 .

[41]  Kim Plunkett,et al.  Learning to associate object categories and label categories: A self-organising model , 2008 .

[42]  Gary Lupyan,et al.  Language is not Just for Talking , 2007, Psychological science.

[43]  T. Kohonen Self-organized formation of topographically correct feature maps , 1982 .

[44]  Sandra R. Waxman,et al.  The origins and evolution of links between word learning and conceptual organization: new evidence from 11‐month‐olds , 2003 .

[45]  B. Love,et al.  Common Mechanisms in Infant and Adult Category Learning. , 2004, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[46]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[47]  Vladimir M. Sloutsky,et al.  The Role of Words and Sounds in Infants' Visual Processing: From Overshadowing to Attentional Tuning , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[48]  Ellen M. Markman,et al.  Constraints Children Place on Word Meanings , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[49]  Sandra R. Waxman,et al.  Words as Invitations to Form Categories: Evidence from 12- to 13-Month-Old Infants , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.