Remote Sensing Applications in Archaeological Research

The spectral capability of early satellite sensors opened new perspectives in the field of archaeological research. The recent availability of hyperspectral and multispectral satellite imageries has established a valid and low cost alternative to aerial imagery in the field of archaeological remote sensing. The high spatial resolution and spectral capability can make the VHR satellite images a valuable data source for archaeological investigation, ranging from synoptic views to small details. Since the beginning of the 20th century, aerial photography has been used in archaeology primarily to view features on the earth’s surface, which are difficult if not impossible to visualize from the ground level (Rowland and Sarris, 2006 ; Vermeulen, F. and Verhoeven, G., 2004). Archaeology is a recent application area of satellite remote sensing and features such as ancient settlements can be detected with remote sensing procedures, provided that the spatial resolution of the sensor is adequate enough to detect the features (Menze et al., 2006). A number of different satellite sensors have been employed in a variety of archaeological applications to the mapping of subsurface remains and the management and protection of archaeological sites (Liu et al., 2003). The advantage of satellite imagery over aerial photography is the greater spectral range, due to the capabilities of the various on-board sensors.

[1]  T. Yonetani,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility. , 1972, Methods in enzymology.

[2]  R. Kauth,et al.  The tasselled cap - A graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat , 1976 .

[3]  F. E. Nicodemus,et al.  Geometrical considerations and nomenclature for reflectance , 1977 .

[4]  Edward J. Milton,et al.  Principles of field spectroscopy , 1987 .

[5]  James H. Scott,et al.  DIPS AND CHIPS -- PC PROGRAMS FOR ANALYZING SEISMIC REFRACTION DATA , 1990 .

[6]  Anthony Clark,et al.  Seeing Beneath the Soil , 1990 .

[7]  N. Che,et al.  Survey of radiometric calibration results and methods for visible and near infrared channels of NOAA-7, -9, and -11 AVHRRs , 1992 .

[8]  A. Clark,et al.  Seeing Beneath the Soil: Prospecting Methods in Archaeology , 1992 .

[9]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Cokriging with ground-based radiometry , 1992 .

[10]  R. Barker,et al.  Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections , 1994 .

[11]  Steven L. De Vore,et al.  Ground‐penetrating radar: An introduction for archaeologists , 1998 .

[12]  Apostolos Sarris,et al.  Geophysical and related techniques applied to archaeological survey in the Mediterranean: a review , 2000 .

[13]  A. Strahler,et al.  A review of reflectance nomenclature used in remote sensing , 2000 .

[14]  Conghe Song,et al.  Monitoring forest succession with multitemporal Landsat images: factors of uncertainty , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[15]  Gary Fry,et al.  Locating archaeological sites in the landscape: a hierarchical approach based on landscape indicators , 2004 .

[16]  L. Conyers Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology , 2004 .

[17]  V. S. Hope,et al.  An assessment of the effectiveness of atmospheric correction algorithms through the remote sensing of some reservoirs , 2004 .

[18]  Geert Verhoeven,et al.  The contribution of aerial photography and field survey to the study of urbanization in the Potenza valley (Picenum) , 2004, Journal of Roman Archaeology.

[19]  Michael L. Galaty,et al.  Geophysical prospection and soil chemistry at the Early Copper Age settlement of Vésztó-Bikeri, Southeastern Hungary , 2004 .

[20]  Lefki Pavlidis,et al.  High Resolution Satellite Imagery for Archaeological Application , 2005 .

[21]  A. Green,et al.  Combined seismic tomographic and ultrashallow seismic reflection study of an Early Dynastic mastaba, Saqqara, Egypt , 2005, Natural Science in Archaeology.

[22]  Edward J. Milton,et al.  Estimating the irradiance spectrum from measurements in a limited number of spectral bands , 2006 .

[23]  N. Linford The application of geophysical methods to archaeological prospection , 2006 .

[24]  T. Painter,et al.  Reflectance quantities in optical remote sensing - definitions and case studies , 2006 .

[25]  Bjoern H Menze,et al.  Detection of Ancient Settlement Mounds - Archaeological Survey Based on the SRTM Terrain Model , 2006 .

[26]  P. Merola,et al.  Buried archaeological structures detection using MIVIS hyperspectral airborne data , 2006, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[27]  Nigel P. Fox,et al.  Progress in Field Spectroscopy , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[28]  V. D. Laet,et al.  Methods for the extraction of archaeological features from very high-resolution Ikonos-2 remote sensing imagery, Hisar (southwest Turkey) , 2007 .

[29]  A. Sarris,et al.  Detection of exposed and subsurface archaeological remains using multi-sensor remote sensing , 2007 .

[30]  R. Cavalli,et al.  Remote hyperspectral imagery as a support to archaeological prospection , 2007 .

[31]  F. El-Baz,et al.  Remote sensing in archaeology , 2007 .

[32]  R. Lasaponara,et al.  Investigating the spectral capability of QuickBird data to detect archaeological remains buried under vegetated and not vegetated areas , 2007 .

[33]  S. G. Nelson,et al.  Relationship Between Remotely-sensed Vegetation Indices, Canopy Attributes and Plant Physiological Processes: What Vegetation Indices Can and Cannot Tell Us About the Landscape , 2008, Sensors.

[34]  T. Astaras,et al.  Reconstructing the neolithic landscape of Thessaly through a GIS and geological approach , 2008 .

[35]  Apostolos Sarris,et al.  REMOTE SENSING APPROACHES | Geophysical , 2008 .

[36]  Apostolos Sarris,et al.  Detection of Neolithic Settlements in Thessaly (Greece) Through Multispectral and Hyperspectral Satellite Imagery , 2009, Sensors.

[37]  U. Böniger,et al.  Integrated data analysis at an archaeological site: A case study using 3D GPR, magnetic, and high-resolution topographic data , 2010 .

[38]  D. Hadjimitsis,et al.  Atmospheric correction for satellite remotely sensed data intended for agricultural applications: Impact on vegetation indices , 2010 .

[39]  Andrew K. Heidinger,et al.  Operational calibration of the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) visible and near-infrared channels , 2010 .

[40]  Raffaele Persico,et al.  Some examples of GPR prospecting for monitoring of the monumental heritage , 2010 .

[41]  Diofantos G. Hadjimitsis,et al.  Hyperspectral Ground Truth Data for the Detection of Buried Architectural Remains , 2010, EuroMed.

[42]  T. Astaras,et al.  Integrated GIS, remote sensing and geomorphologic approaches for the reconstruction of the landscape habitation of Thessaly during the neolithic period , 2011 .

[43]  L. Eppelbaum Review of Environmental and Geological Microgravity Applications and Feasibility of Its Employment at Archaeological Sites in Israel , 2011 .

[44]  Diofantos G. Hadjimitsis,et al.  The Importance of Accounting for Atmospheric Effects in the Application of NDVI and Interpretation of Satellite Imagery Supporting Archaeological Research: The Case Studies of Palaepaphos and Nea Paphos Sites in Cyprus , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[45]  Apostolos Sarris,et al.  Preservation Assessment of Ancient Theatres through Integrated Geophysical Technologies. , 2011 .

[46]  Lieven Verdonck,et al.  3-D GPR survey with a modular system: reducing positioning inaccuracies and linear noise , 2011 .

[47]  Mattia Crespi,et al.  Integration of SAR data, optical satellite images and GPR investigations for archaeological site detection , 2011 .

[48]  Diofantos G. Hadjimitsis,et al.  Vegetation indices and field spectroradiometric measurements for validation of buried architectural remains: verification under area surveyed with geophysical campaigns , 2011 .

[49]  Diofantos G. Hadjimitsis,et al.  Observatory validation of Neolithic tells (“Magoules”) in the Thessalian plain, central Greece, using hyperspectral spectroradiometric data , 2012 .

[50]  J. Beagle Methods of Extraction , 2013 .