‘Adopt a Hypothetical Pup’: A Count Data Approach to the Valuation of Wildlife

The willingness to pay (WTP) for a coyote conservation program is estimated using a novel payment-vehicle, based on how many ‚problem’ coyotes respondents would be willing to sponsor for a year. This hypothetical scenario mimics an increasingly popular type of actual market. Data from a phone survey conducted in Prince Edward Island are analyzed using count data models that consider different processes explaining zero responses and the level of positive responses. This is particularly important in the case of coyotes, often regarded as an economic bad. Estimates of WTP per coyote per year around $18–$22 and annual WTP per contributor of about $46–$57 are obtained.

[1]  N. Bockstael,et al.  The Effect of Common Sources of Regression Error on Benefit Estimates , 1987 .

[2]  Michael Creel,et al.  Theoretical and Empirical Advantages of Truncated Count Data Estimators for Analysis of Deer Hunting in California , 1990 .

[3]  J. Mullahy.  Specification and testing of some modified count data models , 1986 .

[4]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, 2nd Edition , 2005 .

[5]  R. Martínez-Espiñeira.  A Box-Cox Double-Hurdle model of wildlife valuation: The citizen's perspective , 2006 .

[6]  John Mullahy,et al.  HETEROGENEITY, EXCESS ZEROS, AND THE STRUCTURE OF COUNT DATA MODELS , 1997 .

[7]  C. Tisdell,et al.  Information, Wildlife Valuation, Conservation: Experiments and Policy , 2006 .

[8]  W. Douglass Shaw,et al.  Hurdle Count-Data Models In Recreation Demand Analysis , 1996 .

[9]  Q. Vuong.  Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses , 1989 .

[10]  Ronald J. Glass,et al.  MEASURING THE EXISTENCE VALUE OF WILDLIFE - WHAT DO CVM ESTIMATES REALLY SHOW , 1991 .

[11]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  A Test of the Tobit Specification against an Alternative Suggested by Cragg , 1984 .

[12]  Catherine M. Chambers,et al.  A Contingent Valuation Estimate of the Benefits of Wolves in Minnesota , 2003 .

[13]  A. Dragun,et al.  The Worth of a Possum: Valuing Species with the Contingent Valuation Method , 2001 .

[14]  E. Sills,et al.  Estimating Forest Recreation Demand Using Count Data Models , 2003 .

[15]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  On Designing Constructed Markets in Valuation Surveys , 2002 .

[16]  M. Boman,et al.  Valuing the wolf in Sweden : Are benefits contingent upon the supply? , 1999 .

[17]  David M. Drukker,et al.  On boundary-value likelihood-ratio tests , 2001 .

[18]  S. Kellert.  Public perceptions of predators, particularly the wolf and coyote , 1985 .

[19]  Timothy C. Haab,et al.  Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation , 2002 .

[20]  P. Stern,et al.  Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern , 1993 .

[21]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis , 1996 .

[22]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[23]  K. McConnell,et al.  Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources , 2002 .

[24]  John C. Bergstrom,et al.  Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality , 1991 .

[25]  J. Hilbe.  Zero-truncated Poisson and negative binomial regression , 1999 .

[26]  T. Stevens,et al.  PUBLIC-ATTITUDES ABOUT COYOTES IN NEW-ENGLAND , 1994 .

[27]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Excess Zeros in Count Models for Recreational Trips , 1996 .

[28]  Diane Lambert,et al.  Zero-inflacted Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing , 1992 .

[29]  Klaus Moeltner,et al.  The Value of Snowfall to Skiers and Boarders , 2004 .

[30]  Jeffrey Englin,et al.  Estimating Social Welfare Using Count Data Models: An Application to Long-Run Recreation Demand under Conditions of Endogenous Stratification and Truncation , 1995 .

[31]  Allen McDowell,et al.  From the Help Desk: Hurdle Models , 2003 .

[32]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Valuing wildlife in benefit‐cost analyses: A case study involving endangered species , 1987 .

[33]  D. Brookshire,et al.  Estimating Option Prices and Existence Values for Wildlife Resources , 1992 .

[34]  Threatened Species as Public Goods and Public Bads , 1999 .

[35]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation , 1994 .

[36]  T. Swanson,et al.  The Willingness to Pay for Property Rights for the Giant Panda: Can a Charismatic Species Be an Instrument for Nature Conservation? , 2003, Land Economics.

[37]  J. G. Cragg.  Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods , 1971 .

[38]  J. Bowker,et al.  A Contingent Trip Model for Estimating Rail-trail Demand , 2003 .

[39]  L. Arthur.  Coyote Control: the Public Response , 1981 .

[40]  R. Halvorsen,et al.  The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations , 1980 .

[41]  Jeffrey Englin,et al.  Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data , 1996 .

[42]  J. Hausman,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? , 1994 .

[43]  Daniel Hellerstein,et al.  A Theoretical Foundation for Count Data Models , 1993 .

[44]  W. Greene,et al.  Accounting for Excess Zeros and Sample Selection in Poisson and Negative Binomial Regression Models , 1994 .

[45]  David A. Patterson,et al.  Inference and Optimal Design for a Welfare Measure in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 1991 .

[46]  M. Loureiro,et al.  Addressing Heterogeneous Preferences Using Parametric Extended Spike Models , 2004 .

[47]  C. Gourieroux,et al.  Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Methods: Applications to Poisson Models , 1984 .

[48]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Valuing option, existence, and bequest demands for wilderness. , 1983 .

[49]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .