Primary irritation index and safety zone of cosmetics: retrospective analysis of skin patch tests in 7440 Korean women during 12 years

Cosmetics are products used over long periods by the public, and their safety is very important. Several types of human tests are used widely for the evaluation of cosmetics including single patch tests, in‐use tests, human repeated insult patch test (HRIPT). However, there is no clear and well‐defined published objective and standardized criteria for primary skin irritation in regard to the large variety of cosmetic products.

[1]  A. Garcovich,et al.  Macro‐ and microscopic alterations in 2 rabbit skin regions following topically repeated applications of benzoic acid n‐alkyl esters , 1988, Contact dermatitis.

[2]  Ying Yang,et al.  Prediction of ocular irritancy of 26 chemicals and 26 cosmetic products with isolated rabbit eye (IRE) test. , 2012, Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES.

[3]  Manfred Liebsch,et al.  Comparison of human skin irritation patch test data with in vitro skin irritation assays and animal data , 2010, Contact dermatitis.

[4]  K. Wilhelm,et al.  Quantitative assessment of primary skin irritants in vitro in a cytotoxicity model: comparison with in vivo human irritation tests , 2001, The British journal of dermatology.

[5]  David R. Cox,et al.  The Oxford Dictionary of Statistical Terms , 2006 .

[6]  A M Kligman,et al.  The soap chamber test. A new method for assessing the irritancy of soaps. , 1979, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[7]  S. Gaafar,et al.  A comparative study of allergic and primary irritant contact dermatitis with dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB) in dogs. , 1975, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[8]  A. Dogra,et al.  Adverse reactions to cosmetics. , 2003, Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology.

[9]  J. Mckim,et al.  An in vitro method for detecting chemical sensitization using human reconstructed skin models and its applicability to cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and medical device safety testing , 2012, Cutaneous and ocular toxicology.

[10]  T. Vanhaecke,et al.  Screening of repeated dose toxicity data present in SCC(NF)P/SCCS safety evaluations of cosmetic ingredients , 2012, Archives of Toxicology.

[11]  Nino Mozzanixa Pathogenetic aspects of allergic and irritant contact dermatitis , 1992 .

[12]  J. Saurat,et al.  A toxicological and dermatological assessment of aryl alkyl alcohol simple acid ester derivatives when used as fragrance ingredients. , 2012, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[13]  B. Meding Epidemiology of hand eczema in an industrial city. , 1990, Acta dermato-venereologica. Supplementum.

[14]  T. Mahmood,et al.  Short term study of human skin irritation by single application closed patch test: assessment of four multiple emulsion formulations loaded with botanical extracts , 2013, Cutaneous and ocular toxicology.

[15]  Y. Inoue,et al.  A comparison of the physicochemical properties and a sensory test of Acyclovir creams. , 2012, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[16]  R. Marks,et al.  The frequency of reactions to sunscreens: results of a longitudinal population‐based study on the regular use of sunscreens in Australia , 1993, The British journal of dermatology.

[17]  B. Berne,et al.  Patch testing with own cosmetics—a prospective study of testing and reporting of adverse effects to the Swedish Medical Products Agency , 2012, Contact dermatitis.

[18]  D. Basketter,et al.  Visual assessment of human skin irritation: a sensitive and reproducible tool , 1997, Contact dermatitis.

[19]  Uter,et al.  An epidemiological study of the influence of season (cold and dry air) on the occurrence of irritant skin changes of the hands , 1998, The British journal of dermatology.

[20]  S. Schulte,et al.  Safety evaluation of sunscreen formulations containing titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in UVB sunburned skin: an in vitro and in vivo study. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[21]  C. E. O. Praes,et al.  In vitro induction of apoptosis, necrosis and genotoxicity by cosmetic preservatives: application of flow cytometry as a complementary analysis by NRU , 2012, International journal of cosmetic science.

[22]  A. D. de Groot Contact allergy to cosmetics: causative ingredients. , 1987, Contact dermatitis.

[23]  J. R. Scotti,et al.  Available From , 1973 .

[24]  H. Maibach,et al.  24-Hour versus 48-Hour Occlusion in Patch Testing , 2004, Exogenous Dermatology.