Quantitative assessment of colorectal morphology: Implications for robotic colonoscopy.

This paper presents a method of characterizing the distribution of colorectal morphometrics. It uses three-dimensional region growing and topological thinning algorithms to determine and visualize the luminal volume and centreline of the colon, respectively. Total and segmental lengths, diameters, volumes, and tortuosity angles were then quantified. The effects of body orientations on these parameters were also examined. Variations in total length were predominately due to differences in the transverse colon and sigmoid segments, and did not significantly differ between body orientations. The diameter of the proximal colon was significantly larger than the distal colon, with the largest value at the ascending and cecum segments. The volume of the transverse colon was significantly the largest, while those of the descending colon and rectum were the smallest. The prone position showed a higher frequency of high angles and consequently found to be more torturous than the supine position. This study yielded a method for complete segmental measurements of healthy colorectal anatomy and its tortuosity. The transverse and sigmoid colons were the major determinant in tortuosity and morphometrics between body orientations. Quantitative understanding of these parameters may potentially help to facilitate colonoscopy techniques, accuracy of polyp spatial distribution detection, and design of novel endoscopic devices.

[1]  S. Sadahiro,et al.  Analysis of length and surface area of each segment of the large intestine according to age, sex and physique , 2005, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[2]  Z. Fireman,et al.  Sightline ColonoSight system for a disposable, power-assisted, non-fiber-optic colonoscopy (with video). , 2008, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[3]  J. Burdick,et al.  Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. , 2004, JAMA.

[4]  H. Pohl,et al.  A motor-driven single-use colonoscope controlled with a hand-held device: a feasibility study in volunteers. , 2008, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[5]  S. Halligan,et al.  Can barium enema indicate when colonoscopy will be difficult? , 1995, Clinical radiology.

[6]  D J Vining,et al.  Automatic segmentation of the colon for virtual colonoscopy. , 2000, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[7]  G. Passoni,et al.  Functional Evaluation of the Endotics System, a New Disposable Self-Propelled Robotic Colonoscope: in vitro tests and clinical trial , 2009, The International journal of artificial organs.

[8]  Pietro Valdastri,et al.  Advanced endoscopic technologies for colorectal cancer screening. , 2013, World journal of gastroenterology.

[9]  S Halligan,et al.  Quantitative assessment of colonic movement between prone and supine patient positions during CT colonography. , 2009, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  L. Påhlman,et al.  Patient factors influencing the completion rate in colonoscopy. , 2005, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[11]  J. Dam,et al.  Computer-Assisted Colonoscopy (The NeoGuide Endoscopy System): Results of the First Human Clinical Trial (“PACE Study”) , 2007, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[12]  David H. Kim,et al.  Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Dirk Hartmann,et al.  Colon anatomy based on CT colonography and fluoroscopy: impact on looping, straightening and ancillary manoeuvres in colonoscopy. , 2010, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[14]  Steve Halligan,et al.  Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter. , 2003, Radiology.

[15]  Zamir Halpern,et al.  The aer-o-scope: proof of concept of a pneumatic, skill-independent, self-propelling, self-navigating colonoscope. , 2006, Gastroenterology.

[16]  S Halligan,et al.  Why is colonoscopy more difficult in women? , 1996, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[17]  David H. Kim,et al.  Colorectal anatomy in adults at computed tomography colonography: normal distribution and the effect of age, sex, and body mass index , 2009, Endoscopy.

[18]  R. Pearson Association of Colonoscopy and Death from Colorectal Cancer , 2009 .

[19]  Z. Halpern,et al.  The Aer-O-Scope: Proof of concept of a pneumatic, skill-independent, self-propelling, self-navigating colonoscope , 2006 .

[20]  C. Williams,et al.  Intraoperative measurement of colonic anatomy and attachments with relevance to colonoscopy , 1995, The British journal of surgery.

[21]  David R. Stelts,et al.  Computing the centerline of a colon: a robust and efficient method based on 3D skeletons. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[22]  Mie Sato,et al.  Penalized-Distance Volumetric Skeleton Algorithm , 2001, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[23]  L. Rabeneck,et al.  Association of Colonoscopy and Death From Colorectal Cancer , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[24]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Propeller-based wireless device for active capsular endoscopy in the gastric district , 2009, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[25]  C. Destrieux,et al.  Anatomical study of the length of the human intestine , 2002, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[26]  A Menciassi,et al.  Wireless therapeutic endoscopic capsule: in vivo experiment. , 2008, Endoscopy.

[27]  A. Capria,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION OF A NEW DISPOSABLE SELF PROPELLED ROBOTIC COLONOSCOPE: THE E-WORM IN VITRO EVALUATION AND FIRST CLINICAL TRIAL , 2009 .

[28]  Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk,et al.  Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.

[29]  P. Dario,et al.  Magnetic air capsule robotic system: proof of concept of a novel approach for painless colonoscopy , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.