Geographic variation in breast cancer incidence rates in a cohort of U.S. women.

BACKGROUND Breast cancer mortality and incidence rates vary by geographic region in the United States. Previous analytic studies have measured mortality, not incidence, and have used regional prevalences to control for geographic variation in risk factors rather than adjusting for risk factors measured at the level of the individual. We prospectively evaluated regional variation in breast cancer incidence rates in the Nurses' Health Study and assessed the influence of breast cancer risk factors measured at the individual level. METHODS The Nurses' Health Study cohort was established in 1976 when 121700 female nurses aged 30-55 years living in 11 U.S. states were enrolled. These states represent all four regions of the continental United States. We identified 3603 incident cases of invasive breast cancer through 1992 (1794565 person-years of follow-up). We calculated relative risks (RRs) adjusted for age and for age and established risk factors (i.e., multivariate-adjusted analysis), comparing California, the Northeast, and the Midwest with the South. RESULTS For premenopausal women, there was little evidence of regional variation in breast cancer incidence rates, either in age-adjusted or in multivariate-adjusted analyses. For postmenopausal women in California, age-adjusted risk was modestly elevated (RR = 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-1.47); after adjusting for age and for established risk factors, the excess rate in California was attenuated by 25% (RR = 1.18; 95% CI = 1.00-1.40). No excess of breast cancer incidence was observed for postmenopausal women in either the Northeast or the Midwest. CONCLUSIONS Little regional variation in age-adjusted breast cancer incidence rates was observed, with the exception of a modest excess for postmenopausal women in California. Adjustment for differences in the distribution of established risk factors explained some of the excess risk in California.

[1]  L. E. Anderson,et al.  Electric power, pineal function, and the risk of breast cancer , 1992, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[2]  R. Rudel,et al.  Mapping out a search for environmental causes of breast cancer. , 1996, Public health reports.

[3]  J. Fraumeni,et al.  Geographic patterns of breast cancer in the United States. , 1977, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  N. Smith Health promotion and disease prevention. , 1992, Nurse practitioner forum.

[5]  G. Colditz Epidemiology of breast cancer: Findings from the nurses' health study , 1993, Cancer.

[6]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. , 1996, JAMA.

[7]  R B D'Agostino,et al.  Relation of pooled logistic regression to time dependent Cox regression analysis: the Framingham Heart Study. , 1990, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  R. Hoover,et al.  Geographic variation in mortality from breast cancer among white women in the United States. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  A. Dean,et al.  Cancer rates in a community exposed to low levels of creosote components in municipal water. , 1980, Minnesota medicine.

[10]  J L Kelsey,et al.  Breast cancer: magnitude of the problem and descriptive epidemiology. , 1993, Epidemiologic reviews.

[11]  J. Vena,et al.  Use of electric blankets and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  J. F. Young,et al.  Geographic variation in breast cancer mortality in the United States: a hypothesis involving exposure to solar radiation. , 1990, Preventive medicine.

[13]  R. Hiatt,et al.  Breast cancer and serum organochlorines: a prospective study among white, black, and Asian women. , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  J. Kelsey,et al.  Regional differences in known risk factors and the higher incidence of breast cancer in San Francisco. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  D. A. Dawson,et al.  Breast cancer risk factors and screening: United States, 1987. , 1990, Vital and health statistics. Series 10, Data from the National Health Survey.

[16]  Linda W. Pickle,et al.  Atlas of U.S. cancer mortality among whites: 1950-1980. , 1987 .

[17]  E. Spratley Birth and fertility rates for states and metropolitan areas: United States. , 1977, Vital and health statistics. Series 21, Data from the National Vital Statistics System.

[18]  N Dubin,et al.  Blood levels of organochlorine residues and risk of breast cancer. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  R. Abbott Logistic regression in survival analysis. , 1985, American journal of epidemiology.

[20]  M. Silverstein Ductal carcinomain situ of the breast , 1997 .

[21]  W. Willett,et al.  Validation of questionnaire information on risk factors and disease outcomes in a prospective cohort study of women. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.

[22]  D G Hoel,et al.  Medical hypothesis: xenoestrogens as preventable causes of breast cancer. , 1993, Environmental health perspectives.

[23]  W. Willett,et al.  Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. , 1985, American journal of epidemiology.

[24]  J. Pierce,et al.  Regional differences in the incidence and treatment of carcinoma in situ of the breast. , 1996, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[25]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[26]  S. Ventura,et al.  Birth and fertility rates for states: United States, 1990. , 1994, Vital and health statistics. Series 21, Data on natality, marriage, and divorce.

[27]  C. Schoenborn,et al.  Health promotion and disease prevention: United States, 1990. , 1993, Vital and health statistics. Series 10, Data from the National Health Survey.