Evaluating online asynchronous support In the institutes of technology Ireland

As the uptake of e-learning continues to increase, it has come to light that engaging students in e-learning requires a large time commitment on the part of the lecturer. The burden may be eased by the expedient use of online asynchronous support tools. This research evaluates the use of asynchronous support tools in the Irish Institutes of Technology (IoTs) and their application to the provision of online support to IoT students. It provides an evaluation of the perception of IoT students as to the adequacy of asynchronous support offered to them and prescribes for improvement of that support. The research suggests that asynchronous support tools are substantially underutilised within the IoTs and consequently that student engagement via asynchronous support is insufficient in meeting their learning needs. While email is identified as the preferred and dominant means of communications, discussion boards and weblogs are not employed to anywhere near potential. The findings suggest that improved use of asynchronous support tools would help redistribute scarce lecturer's time and address the important issue of providing online support to students in a ‘just-in-time’ learning manner, rather than a ‘just-in-case’ data repository. In addition it recommends the integration of e-learning platforms and their constituent tools with a knowledge base. This would facilitate the lecturer in providing ‘reusable’ and ‘in context’ online support to be used by students if and when required. The findings therefore present two major challenges to IoTs: to enhance student support by substantially improving the current use of online asynchronous support tools and to employ the expedient use of semantic technologies. Facing and surmounting these challenges are a vital step in creating and sustaining a quality online supportive environment for both lecturer and student.

[1]  Michael A. Shepherd,et al.  A Goal-based Classification of Web Information Tasks , 2006, ASIST.

[2]  Martha Burkle E-learning Research , 2009 .

[3]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[4]  Harold W. Bernard,et al.  Psychology of learning and teaching , 1954 .

[5]  John McLaughlin,et al.  Research and Evaluation Methods in Special Education , 2003 .

[6]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[7]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Automated Collaboration on the Semantic Web , 2005 .

[8]  G. Maeroff A Classroom of One: How Online Learning Is Changing our Schools and Colleges , 2003 .

[9]  Mats Danielson,et al.  Exploring the e-Learning State of Art , 2008 .

[10]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Online professional development for teachers , 2004 .

[11]  Tim Hand,et al.  Enhancing Quality in Online Learning: Scaffolding Planning and Design Through Proactive Evaluation , 2002 .

[12]  Fernando Alonso,et al.  An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[13]  A. Smith,et al.  Research Methodology: A Step-by-step Guide for Beginners , 2012 .

[14]  Michael Scheuermann Leveraging Adult Student Value in the E-Learning Environment - A Pedagogical Shift , 2003 .

[15]  Eugene O'Loughlin,et al.  e-Learning research and development roadmap for Ireland , 2005 .

[16]  Lois A. Ritter,et al.  Conducting Online Surveys , 2011 .

[17]  Christopher Essex,et al.  Synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in distance education , 2001 .

[18]  David Dwayne Williams Improving use of learning technologies in higher education through participant oriented evaluations , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[19]  S Holland Distance learning is here to stay. , 1987, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[20]  Walter F. Deal Distance Learning: Teaching Technology Online. Resources in Technology. , 2002 .

[21]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[22]  M. Hoepfl Choosing Qualitative Research: A Primer for Technology Education Researchers , 1997 .

[23]  Terry Anderson,et al.  E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice , 2016 .

[24]  Robin H. Kay,et al.  Developing a comprehensive metric for assessing discussion board effectiveness , 2006, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[25]  Karen Kear,et al.  Peer learning using asynchronous discussion systems in distance education , 2004 .

[26]  Chris Dede,et al.  Online Professional Development for Teachers: Emerging Models and Methods. , 2006 .

[27]  A. Twycross Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Creswell John W Sage 320 £29 0761924426 0761924426 [Formula: see text]. , 2004, Nurse researcher.

[28]  Mark Mabrito,et al.  A Study of Synchronous Versus Asynchronous Collaboration in an Online Business Writing Class , 2006 .

[29]  Thomas M. Duffy,et al.  Using asynchronous conferencing to promote critical thinking: two implementations in higher education , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[30]  Pamela Rogerson-Revell,et al.  Directions in e‐learning tools and technologies and their relevance to online distance language education , 2007 .

[31]  Zheng Ye Yang,et al.  Factors influencing distance-education graduate students' use of information sources: A user study , 2004 .

[32]  Robert M. Aiken,et al.  Supporting Collaborative Learning With An Intelligent Web-Based System , 2007, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[33]  Pedro A. González-Calero,et al.  Case-based reasoning-inspired approaches to education , 2005, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[34]  Ranjit Kumar,et al.  Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners , 1999 .

[35]  Terri Gullickson Social Research Methods (3rd ed.). , 1995 .