Remediation of acidic waste waters using immobilised, acidophilic sulfate‐reducing bacteria

Acidic waste waters from industrial and mining activities constitute a wordwide environmental hazard. ‘Acid mine drainage’ (AMD) waters are often highly acidic (pH < 4), contain elevated concentrations of sulfate and dissolved metals, and are toxic to most life forms. Whilst bioremediation of acidic, metal-contaminated waters using sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) has been successfully demonstrated in pilot-scale and full-scale operations during the past decade, the sensitivity of characterised SRB to acidity limits their use in AMD remediation. In the current study, we have evaluated the potential use of novel acidophilic SRB for remediating acidic waste waters, in comparision with, and in conjuction with, neutrophilic SRB. Three SRB-populations (a mixed population of acidophilic isolates, a neutrophilic culture and a mixed acidophilic/neutrophilic consortium) were immobilised on porous glass beads, packed into perspex columns and the three bioreactors percolated with synthetic medium for several months. Energy and carbon source utilisation, and tolerance to acid stress of the different consortia were evaluated. Acidophilic SRB were more efficient than the neutrophilic culture in coupling ethanol oxidation to sulfate reduction and all of the substrates tested were oxidised to acetic acid. The bioreactors containing acidophilic SRB reduced sulfate and generated alkalinity when challenged with influent at pH 3 and above, indicating that such bacteria have potential for bioremediating highly acidic waste waters. Average conversion rates of 0.25–0.30 g SO42− reduced dm−3 day−1 were achieved with bioreactors containing acidophilic SRB, percolated with a pH 4 liquid medium. © 2001 Society of Chemical Industry

[1]  G Lettinga,et al.  Biological sulphate reduction using gas‐lift reactors fed with hydrogen and carbon dioxide as energy and carbon source , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  David Banks,et al.  Mine-water chemistry: the good, the bad and the ugly , 1997 .

[3]  R. Hammack,et al.  Treatment of water from an open-pit copper mine using biogenic sulfide and limestone: A feasibility study , 1994 .

[4]  H. Dijkman,et al.  Biological treatment of acid mine drainage , 1999 .

[5]  A. Sen,et al.  Acidophilic sulphate reducing bacteria : candidates for bioremediation of acid mine drainage pollution , 2001 .

[6]  D. Johnson,et al.  Biogeochemical cycling of iron and sulphur in leaching environments , 1993 .

[7]  W. Babel,et al.  Bioremediation of acid mine water using facultatively methylotrophic metal-tolerant sulfate-reducing bacteria , 1997 .

[8]  R. Hedin,et al.  Treatment of metal‐contaminated water using bacterial sulfate reduction: Results from pilot‐scale reactors , 1992, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[9]  G Lettinga,et al.  Biological sulfate reduction using synthesis gas as energy and carbon source , 1996, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  D. Lovley,et al.  Rapid Assay for Microbially Reducible Ferric Iron in Aquatic Sediments , 1987, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[11]  R. Cord-Ruwisch.  A quick method for the determination of dissolved and precipitated sulfides in cultures of sulfate-reducing bacteria , 1985 .

[12]  D. Johnson,et al.  Biodiversity and ecology of acidophilic microorganisms , 1998 .

[13]  D. B. Johnson,et al.  Acidophilic microbial communities: Candidates for bioremediation of acidic mine effluents , 1995 .