Fundamentals of Building Deconstruction as a Circular Economy Strategy for the Reuse of Construction Materials

The construction industry is one of the most environmentally detrimental industries in the world, impacting directly the use of raw materials, their determination of use involving the whole lifecycle, as well as all their surrounding environment. However, within the building sector, the transition from a linear to a circular economy is still at an early stage. Business models need to be reconsidered to include new and improved methods and innovative services that could lead to a net reduction in the use of resources and minimizing the waste disposed on landfills. In this context, an important role in buildings’ circularity is “deconstruction”, which is understood as a well-considered selective dismantlement of building components, in prevision of a future reuse, repurposing, or recycling. It represents a sustainable alternative to common demolition, which tends to be an arbitrary and destructive process, and although faster and cheaper, it typically creates a substantial amount of waste. The purpose of this article is to analyze the deconstruction potential of buildings and the strategies to apply in order to keep the impacts on the urban environment low. The article aims to facilitate the implementation of circular economy strategies for buildings by proposing common principles for deconstruction as a sustainable alternative to demolition and defining the key points to be applied during the design and planning process regardless of the type of construction system or material used.

[1]  Danielle Densley Tingley,et al.  Barriers and drivers in a circular economy: the case of the built environment , 2019, Procedia CIRP.

[2]  Cassidy Johnson,et al.  Impacts of prefabricated temporary housing after disasters: 1999 earthquakes in Turkey , 2007 .

[3]  Diana Sommer Mechanical Design Of Machine Elements And Machines A Failure Prevention Perspective , 2016 .

[4]  Otto Rentz,et al.  Cost-effective deconstruction by a combination of dismantling, sorting and recycling processes , 2002 .

[5]  Sudhir K. Jain,et al.  Design of non-structural elements for buildings : A review of codal provisions , 2005 .

[6]  David B. Dooner,et al.  Mechanical Design of Machine Elements and Machines: A Failure Prevention Perspective , 2002 .

[7]  Philip Crowther Design for Buildability and the Deconstruction Consequences , 2002 .

[8]  Guenter Langergraber,et al.  Framework Conditions and Strategies for Pop-Up Environments in Urban Planning , 2019, Sustainability.

[9]  Sang-Ho Lee,et al.  Life cycle carbon dioxide assessment tool for buildings in the schematic design phase , 2013 .

[10]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Emergy analysis of building manufacturing, maintenance and use: Em-building indices to evaluate housing sustainability , 2007 .

[11]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction , 2007 .

[12]  D. Crosthwaite The global construction market: a cross-sectional analysis , 2000 .

[13]  Nilay Cosgun,et al.  Reuse and recycle potentials of the temporary houses after occupancy: Example of Duzce, Turkey , 2008 .

[14]  Wasim Salama Design of concrete buildings for disassembly: An explorative review , 2017 .

[15]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Assessing buildings’ absolute environmental sustainability performance using LCA focusing on climate change impacts , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[16]  Barbara Mayer,et al.  Vitruvius The Ten Books On Architecture , 2016 .

[17]  Frank Schultmann,et al.  Deconstruction, demolition and destruction , 2011 .

[18]  Philipp Dietsch,et al.  Assessing the integrity of glued-laminated timber elements , 2015 .

[19]  Muhammad Nasir,et al.  Models for Prediction of 28-Day Concrete Compressive Strength , 2016 .

[20]  Lukumon O. Oyedele,et al.  Waste minimisation through deconstruction: A BIM based Deconstructability Assessment Score (BIM-DAS) , 2015 .

[21]  J. Korhonen,et al.  Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations , 2018 .

[22]  Alberto Carpinteri,et al.  Structural Mechanics: A unified approach , 1997 .

[23]  Xiaodong Cao,et al.  Building energy-consumption status worldwide and the state-of-the-art technologies for zero-energy buildings during the past decade , 2016 .

[24]  Filbert Musau,et al.  Scottish Passive House: Insights into Environmental Conditions in Monitored Passive Houses , 2016 .

[25]  P. Lassandro DECONSTRUCTION CASE STUDY IN SOUTHERN ITALY : ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT , 2006 .

[26]  Rolf André Bohne,et al.  Barriers for Deconstruction and Reuse/Recycling of Construction Materials in Norway , 2014 .

[27]  Jaime Solís-Guzmán,et al.  A Spanish model for quantification and management of construction waste. , 2009, Waste management.

[28]  Kim Ragaert,et al.  Design from recycling , 2017 .

[29]  Jouri Kanters,et al.  Design for Deconstruction in the Design Process: State of the Art , 2018, Buildings.

[30]  Networks Within Cities and Among Cities: A Paradigm for Urban Development and Governance , 2006 .

[31]  Lukumon O. Oyedele,et al.  Design for Deconstruction (DfD): Critical success factors for diverting end-of-life waste from landfills. , 2017, Waste management.

[32]  Alistair G.F. Gibb,et al.  Re-engineering through pre-assembly: client expectations and drivers , 2003 .

[33]  Spiros Papaefthimiou,et al.  Enhancing the circular economy with nature-based solutions in the built urban environment: green building materials, systems and sites , 2019, Blue-Green Systems.

[34]  A. Tukker,et al.  Upgrading construction and demolition waste management from downcycling to recycling in the Netherlands , 2020 .

[35]  M. Greenhalgh The survival of Roman antiquities in the Middle Ages , 1989 .

[36]  Buick Davison,et al.  Design for deconstruction and material reuse , 2011 .

[37]  Mohamed Osmani,et al.  Circular economy in construction: current awareness, challenges and enablers , 2017 .

[38]  Pe Michael F. Hein Ms,et al.  Construction Challenges of Adaptive Reuse of Historical Buildings in Europe , 2008 .

[39]  N. Bocken,et al.  Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy , 2016 .

[40]  A new Circular Economy Action Plan: For a cleaner and more competitive Europe , 2020 .

[41]  A Manewa,et al.  Sustainable implications of building reuse and adaptation , 2014 .

[42]  Bashar S Mohammed,et al.  Behavior of the Dry Bed Joint in the Mortarless Interlocking Masonry System: an Overview , 2018 .

[43]  Frank Schultmann Resource-constraint project scheduling for deconstruction projects , 2003 .

[44]  Riccardo Christopher Spani The New Circular Economy Action Plan , 2020 .

[45]  S. F. Tavares,et al.  Circular economy in the construction industry: A systematic literature review , 2020 .

[46]  Griet Verbeeck,et al.  Existing databases as means to explore the potential of the building stock as material bank , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[47]  Atiq Uz Zaman,et al.  Resource Harvesting through a Systematic Deconstruction of the Residential House: A Case Study of the ‘Whole House Reuse’ Project in Christchurch, New Zealand , 2018, Sustainability.

[48]  Maurizio Brocato,et al.  Measuring reuse potential and waste creation of wooden façades , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[49]  E Durmisevic,et al.  Re-use potential of steel in building construction , 2003 .

[50]  Liangjie Qi,et al.  Experimental studies on steel frame structures of traditional-style buildings , 2016 .

[51]  A. Oke,et al.  A systematic review of circular economy research in the construction industry , 2020 .

[52]  C. Björdal,et al.  A review and case studies of factors affecting the stability of wooden foundation piles in urban environments exposed to construction work , 2020 .