Financing investments in renewable energy: The role of policy design and restructuring

The costs of electric power projects utilizing renewable energy technologies are highly sensitive to financing terms. Consequently, as the electricity industry is restructured and new renewables policies are created, it is important for policymakers to consider the impacts of renewables policy design on project financing. This report describes the power plant financing process and provides insights to policymakers on the important nexus between renewables policy design and finance. A cash-flow model is used to estimate the impact of various financing variables on renewable energy costs. Past and current renewable energy policies are then evaluated to demonstrate the influence of policy design on the financing process and on financing costs. The possible impacts of electricity restructuring on power plant financing are discussed and key design issues are identified for three specific renewable energy programs being considered in the restructuring process: (1) surcharge-funded policies; (2) renewables portfolio standards; and (3) green marketing programs. Finally, several policies that are intended to directly reduce financing costs and barriers are analyzed. The authors find that one of the key reasons that renewables policies are not more effective is that project development and financing processes are frequently ignored or misunderstood when designing and implementing renewable energy incentives. A policy that is carefully designed can reduce renewable energy costs dramatically by providing revenue certainty that will, in turn, reduce financing risk premiums.

[1]  Ryan Wiser.  Renewable energy finance and project ownership: The impact of alternative development structures on the cost of wind power , 1997 .

[2]  T. Hoff,et al.  Managing Risk Using Renewable Energy Technologies , 1997 .

[3]  D. E. Collier,et al.  Utility grid-connected photovoltaic distributed power systems , 1996 .

[4]  California renewable energy policy and implementation issues: An overview of recent regulatory and legislative action , 1996 .

[5]  B. C. Farhar,et al.  Willingness to pay for electricity from renewable energy , 1996 .

[6]  R. Norgaard,et al.  Efficiency and sustainability in restructured electricity markets: the renewables portfolio standard , 1996 .

[7]  Joseph H. Eto,et al.  A scoping study on energy-efficiency market transformation by California Utility DSM Programs , 1996 .

[8]  E. Kahn,et al.  Alternative windpower ownership structures: Financing terms and project costs , 1996 .

[9]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  The renewables NFFO: A review , 1995 .

[10]  C. Pistole.  Structuring small projects , 1995 .

[11]  C. Mitchell.  Renewable Energy in the UK: Financing Options for the Future , 1995 .

[12]  A. Churchill.  Beyond project finance , 1995 .

[13]  Comparison of financing costs for wind turbine and fossil powerplants , 1995 .

[14]  A. Jenkins,et al.  Tax barriers to solar central receiver generation technology , 1994 .

[15]  M. H. Brown,et al.  Changing a historical perspective , 1994 .

[16]  M. H. Brown.  Financing renewable energy: Obstacles and solutions , 1994 .

[17]  Kulsum Ahmed,et al.  Renewable energy technologies : a review of the status and costs of selected technologies , 1994 .

[18]  J. Busch,et al.  Primer on Gas Integrated Resource Planning , 1993 .

[19]  D. Moskovitz.  ‘Green pricing’: Customer choice moves beyond IRP , 1993 .

[20]  S. Anson,et al.  Profiles in renewable energy: Case studies of successful utility-sector projects , 1993 .

[21]  The price of electricity from private power producers , 1993 .

[22]  Stanton W. Hadley.  Report on the Study of the Tax and Rate Treatment of Renewable Energy Projects , 1993 .

[23]  Tim Jackson.  Summary paper for the renewables series , 1992 .

[24]  M. Meal,et al.  Analysis of debt leveraging in private power projects , 1992 .

[25]  David Elliott,et al.  Renewables and the privatization of the UK ESI: A case study , 1992 .

[26]  M. Lotker,et al.  Barriers to commercialization of large-scale solar electricity: Lessions learned from the LUZ experience , 1991 .

[27]  D. S. Shugar,et al.  Comparison of photovoltaics with solar thermal trough electric systems as a central station utility resource in the 1990s , 1991, The Conference Record of the Twenty-Second IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1991.

[28]  S. Fox-Penner,et al.  Competitive procurement of electric utility resources , 1990 .

[29]  E. Kahn,et al.  Designing a performance based cost-sharing system for the Clean Coal Technology Program , 1989 .

[30]  C. A. Goldman,et al.  Evaluation Methods in Competitive Bidding for Electric Power. Volume 2: Technical Appendix , 1989 .

[31]  E. Kahn.  Electric utility planning and regulation , 1988 .

[32]  B. Coe,et al.  Geothermal Loan Guaranty Program: recommendations for improvement including new simplified application procedures for small projects , 1980 .

[33]  Jerold B. Warner,et al.  On financial contracting: An analysis of bond covenants , 1979 .

[34]  L. Icerman,et al.  Solar energy research institute (SERI) , 1978 .