The Role of Lateral Occipitotemporal Junction and Area MT/V5 in the Visual Analysis of Upper-Limb Postures

Humans, like numerous other species, strongly rely on the observation of gestures of other individuals in their everyday life. It is hypothesized that the visual processing of human gestures is sustained by a specific functional architecture, even at an early prelexical cognitive stage, different from that required for the processing of other visual entities. In the present PET study, the neural basis of visual gesture analysis was investigated with functional neuroimaging of brain activity during naming and orientation tasks performed on pictures of either static gestures (upper-limb postures) or tridimensional objects. To prevent automatic object-related cerebral activation during the visual processing of postures, only intransitive postures were selected, i. e., symbolic or meaningless postures which do not imply the handling of objects. Conversely, only intransitive objects which cannot be handled were selected to prevent gesture-related activation during their visual processing. Results clearly demonstrate a significant functional segregation between the processing of static intransitive postures and the processing of intransitive tridimensional objects. Visual processing of objects elicited mainly occipital and fusiform gyrus activity, while visual processing of postures strongly activated the lateral occipitotemporal junction, encroaching upon area MT/V5, involved in motion analysis. These findings suggest that the lateral occipitotemporal junction, working in association with area MT/V5, plays a prominent role in the high-level perceptual analysis of gesture, namely the construction of its visual representation, available for subsequent recognition or imitation.

[1]  Josh H. McDermott,et al.  Functional imaging of human visual recognition. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  H. Sakata,et al.  Neural mechanisms of visual guidance of hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[4]  C. Moore,et al.  Intentional relations and social understanding , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Evidence for visuomotor priming effect , 1996, Neuroreport.

[7]  R. Myers Quantification of brain function using PET , 1996 .

[8]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Vision and motor control , 1992 .

[9]  G. Winocur,et al.  Dissociation of pathways for object and spatial vision: a PET study in humans , 1995, Neuroreport.

[10]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Networks of domain-specific and general regions involved in episodic memory for spatial location and object identity , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  M A Mintun,et al.  An examination of regional cerebral blood flow during object naming tasks , 1998, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Cognitive Conjunction: A New Approach to Brain Activation Experiments , 1997, NeuroImage.

[14]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Discrete Cortical Regions Associated with Knowledge of Color and Knowledge of Action , 1995, Science.

[15]  H. Sakata,et al.  Parietal neurons related to memory-guided hand manipulation. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Specific Involvement of Human Parietal Systems and the Amygdala in the Perception of Biological Motion , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  W. Singer,et al.  The constructive nature of vision: direct evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of apparent motion and motion imagery , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[18]  M Jeannerod,et al.  Visual pathways for object-oriented action and object recognition: functional anatomy with PET. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Topographical representations of mental images in primary visual cortex , 1995, Nature.

[20]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography , 1994, Nature.

[21]  A. Dale,et al.  Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, Nature.

[22]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge , 1996, Nature.

[23]  C. Hall,et al.  Chapter 11 Limb Apraxia: A Process Approach , 1992 .

[24]  G. Orban,et al.  Many areas in the human brain respond to visual motion. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  A Locus in Human Extrastriate Cortex for Visual Shape Analysis , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  J Rönnberg,et al.  Signed and spoken language perception studied by positron emission tomography , 1997, Neurology.

[27]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Brain regions associated with retrieval of structurally coherent visual information , 1995, Nature.

[28]  S Zeki,et al.  Going beyond the information given: the relation of illusory visual motion to brain activity , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Trouble with Cognitive Subtraction , 1996, NeuroImage.

[30]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context , 1997, Nature.

[31]  K. Heilman,et al.  A Cognitive Neuropsychological Model of Limb Praxis , 1991 .

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  G. Goldenberg,et al.  The meaning of meaningless gestures: A study of visuo-imitative apraxia , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  K. Heilman,et al.  Selective deficit of praxis imagery in ideomotor apraxia , 1997, Neurology.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Subtractions, conjunctions, and interactions in experimental design of activation studies , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[36]  K M Heilman,et al.  Dissociation of gesture and object recognition , 1998, Neurology.

[37]  K. Heilman,et al.  Two forms of ideomotor apraxia , 1982, Neurology.

[38]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. , 1993, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Encoding words and pictures: A positron emission tomography study , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  D Bavelier,et al.  Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: biological constraints and effects of experience. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  John C. Mazziotta,et al.  CHAPTER 68 – Improved Analysis of Functional Activation Studies Involving Within-Subject Replications Using a Three-Way ANOVA Model , 1996 .

[42]  K. Heilman,et al.  Visual-imitative dissociation apraxia , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  E. Procyk,et al.  Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject's strategy. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[44]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Distinct neural correlates of visual long-term memory for spatial location and object identity: a positron emission tomography study in humans. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[46]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Functional anatomy of a common semantic system for words and pictures , 1996, Nature.