Retrieval The Critical Roles of Localization and Physiology for Understanding Parietal Contributions to Memory

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of recognition memory ubiquitously demonstrate retrievalrelated activity in left lateral parietal cortex (LLPC) when contrasting studied (“old”) items with unstudied (“new”) items. Recent work demonstrates that there is considerable functional–anatomical heterogeneity in LLPC. One implication of this observation is that singleor dual-process models fall short of characterizing LLPC contributions to memory retrieval. Instead of considering LLPC as a single entity, functional accounts must be given for each of the distinct regions that show retrieval-related effects; we posit there are a minimum of four such regions and very likely more. Identification of these LLPC regions requires careful analysis to map the boundaries and the extent of the regions precisely. In addition, characterizing the functional responses as activations or deactivations relative to baseline will be crucial in understanding the underlying cognitive processes. Considering LLPC in both memory and “nonmemory” domains will also illuminate the contribution of these regions, because it is certainly unlikely they serve only the domain of memory retrieval.

[1]  E. Tulving Memory and consciousness. , 1985 .

[2]  S. Yantis,et al.  Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Kaustubh Supekar,et al.  Dissociable connectivity within human angular gyrus and intraparietal sulcus: evidence from functional and structural connectivity. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Marc Joliot,et al.  Brain activity at rest: a multiscale hierarchical functional organization. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  R. Buckner,et al.  THE COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE OF REMEMBERING , 2001 .

[7]  S. Petersen,et al.  The “Task B problem” and other considerations in developmental functional neuroimaging , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[8]  Ingrid R. Olson,et al.  Dissociation Between Memory Accuracy and Memory Confidence Following Bilateral Parietal Lesions , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Melina R. Uncapher,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex and episodic retrieval: convergent and divergent effects of attention and memory. , 2009, Learning & memory.

[10]  K. Amunts,et al.  The human inferior parietal lobule in stereotaxic space , 2008, Brain Structure and Function.

[11]  I. Dobbins,et al.  Use of explicit memory cues following parietal lobe lesions , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Symbol processing in the left angular gyrus: Evidence from passive perception of digits , 2011, NeuroImage.

[13]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Cognitive contributions of the ventral parietal cortex: an integrative theoretical account , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  R. Buckner,et al.  Neural Correlates of Episodic Retrieval Success , 2000, NeuroImage.

[15]  Kaia L. Vilberg,et al.  Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: A review of evidence from a dual-process perspective , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  Paul C Fletcher,et al.  Does the brain have a baseline? Why we should be resisting a rest. , 2007, NeuroImage.

[17]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: A hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  A default mode of brain function: A brief history of an evolving idea , 2007, NeuroImage.

[19]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[20]  Paul C. Fletcher,et al.  Is the parietal lobe necessary for recollection in humans? , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  S. Petersen,et al.  Retrieval Success is Accompanied by Enhanced Activation in Anterior Prefrontal Cortex During Recognition Memory: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  M. Rugg,et al.  Separating the Brain Regions Involved in Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Timothy S. Coalson,et al.  Parcellations and hemispheric asymmetries of human cerebral cortex analyzed on surface-based atlases. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  A Parcellation Scheme for Human Left Lateral Parietal Cortex , 2010, Neuron.

[26]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Tractography-Based Parcellation of the Human Parietal Cortex and Comparison with Human and Macaque Resting-State Functional Connectivity , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Raichle,et al.  Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  J. Downar,et al.  A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Mark E Wheeler,et al.  Functional-anatomic correlates of remembering and knowing , 2004, NeuroImage.

[30]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  The human inferior parietal cortex: Cytoarchitectonic parcellation and interindividual variability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[31]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Parcellating an Individual Subject's Cortical and Subcortical Brain Structures Using Snowball Sampling of Resting-State Correlations , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  M. Mintun,et al.  Brain work and brain imaging. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[33]  Arthur P. Shimamura,et al.  Task relevance modulates successful retrieval effects during explicit and implicit memory tests , 2011, NeuroImage.

[34]  Kaia L. Vilberg,et al.  Comparison of the neural correlates of retrieval success in tests of cued recall and recognition memory , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[35]  Damien A. Fair,et al.  Defining functional areas in individual human brains using resting functional connectivity MRI , 2008, NeuroImage.

[36]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  In praise of tedious anatomy , 2007, NeuroImage.

[38]  I. Dobbins,et al.  Unexpected novelty and familiarity orienting responses in lateral parietal cortex during recognition judgment , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  Craig E. L. Stark,et al.  When zero is not zero: The problem of ambiguous baseline conditions in fMRI , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Seghier,et al.  Functional Subdivisions in the Left Angular Gyrus Where the Semantic System Meets and Diverges from the Default Network , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[43]  S. Petersen,et al.  Concepts and principles in the analysis of brain networks , 2011, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Neal J Cohen,et al.  Brain Imaging, Cognitive Processes, and Brain Networks , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[45]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[46]  B. Hayden,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of default-mode processing in macaque posterior cingulate cortex , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[49]  T. Shallice,et al.  Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Benjamin J. Shannon,et al.  Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  W. Scoville,et al.  LOSS OF RECENT MEMORY AFTER BILATERAL HIPPOCAMPAL LESIONS , 1957, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[52]  Sophie K Scott,et al.  The neural response to changing semantic and perceptual complexity during language processing , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[53]  N. Logothetis The Underpinnings of the BOLD Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Areas Involved in Encoding and Applying Directional Expectations to Moving Objects , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.