Forensic individualisation from biometric data.

This paper deals with the question of inference of identity of source in forensic science and focuses on the individualisation process of human beings from biometric data. Its goal is to explicitly describe the logical mechanisms that underpin the inference of identity of source in forensic science and to propose a concrete methodology for the forensic individualisation from biometric data. It also analyses the limits of several biometric modalities (fingerprint, face, voice) used for forensic individualisation. Firstly, the concept of identity and its application in forensic science is described. Secondly, the confusion between numerical and qualitative identity is addressed. Thirdly, the hypotheticaldeductive method is described as a logical approach for forensic individualisation and the likelihood ratio approach premised on the Bayes Theorem is proposed as a concrete methodology to infer identity of human beings from biometric data in forensic science. Finally a concrete framework is proposed, which includes hypotheses definition, sources and databases selection, analysis and comparison of biometric data and their interpretation.

[1]  I. W. Evett,et al.  Towards a uniform framework for reporting opinions in forensic science casework , 1998 .

[2]  Christophe Champod,et al.  Forerunners of Bayesianism in Early Forensic Science. , 1999 .

[3]  Philip M. Kellett Individualization: Principles and Procedures in Criminalistics , 1996 .

[4]  Robert B. Stacey Report on the Erroneous Fingerprint Individualization in the Madrid Train Bombing Case , 2005 .

[5]  L.W.J. Boves Commercial applications of speaker verification: overview and critical succes factors , 1998 .

[6]  H. Bremermann What Mathematics Can and Cannot Do for Pattern Recognition , 1971 .

[7]  P. L. Kirk,et al.  The Ontogeny of Criminalistics , 1963 .

[8]  G.R. Doddington,et al.  Speaker recognition—Identifying people by their voices , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[9]  D A Stoney,et al.  What made us ever think we could individualize using statistics? , 1991, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[10]  F S Cooper,et al.  Speaker identification by speech spectrograms: a scientists' view of its reliability for legal purposes. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Didier Meuwly,et al.  The inference of identity in forensic speaker recognition , 2000, Speech Commun..

[12]  Ian W. Evett,et al.  Expert evidence and forensic misconceptions of the nature of exact science , 1996 .

[13]  Brian R. Clifford,et al.  Voice identification by human listeners: On earwitness reliability , 1980 .

[14]  Arthur Conan Doyle,et al.  The Sign of Four , 1890 .

[15]  C Champod,et al.  Computer Assisted Analysis of Minutiae Occurences on Fingerprints. , 1996 .

[16]  I. Evett,et al.  Earmarks as evidence: a critical review. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.