Accelerated tomotherapy delivery with TomoEdge technique

TomoEDGE is an advanced delivery form of tomotherapy which uses a dynamic secondary collimator. This plan comparison study describes the new features, their clinical applicability, and their effect on plan quality and treatment speed. For the first 45 patients worldwide that were scheduled for a treatment with TomoEdge, at least two plans were created: one with the previous “standard”mode with static jaws and 2.5 cm field width (Reg 2.5) and one with TomoEdge technique and 5 cm field width (Edge 5). If, after analysis in terms of beam on time, integral dose, dose conformity, and organ at risk sparing the treating physician decided that the Edge 5 plan was not suitable for clinical treatment, a plan with TomoEdge and 2.5 cm field width was created (Edge 2.5) and used for the treatment. Among the 45 cases, 30 were suitable for Edge 5 treatment, including treatments of the head and neck, rectal cancer, anal cancer, malignancies of the chest, breast cancer, and palliative treatments. In these cases, the use of a 5 cm field width reduced beam on time by more than 30% without compromising plan quality. The 5 cm beam could not be clinically applied to treatments of the pelvic lymph nodes for prostate cancer and to head and neck irradiations with extensive involvement of the skull, as dose to critical organs at risk such as bladder (average dose 28 Gy vs. 29 Gy, Reg 2.5 vs. Edge 5), small bowel (29% vs. 31%, Reg 2.5 vs. Edge 5) and brain (average dose partial brain 19 Gy vs. 21 Gy, Reg 2.5 vs. Edge 5) increased to a clinically relevant, yet not statistically significant, amount. TomoEdge is an advantageous extension of the tomotherapy technique that can speed up treatments and thus increase patient comfort and safety in the majority of clinical settings. PACS numbers: 87.55.de, 87.55ne

[1]  J. Debus,et al.  Tomotherapy Radiosurgery for Arteriovenous Malformations — Current Possibilities and Future Options with Helical Tomotherapy Dynamic Jaws? , 2013, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[2]  V. Grégoire,et al.  The potential of helical tomotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer. , 2013, The oncologist.

[3]  Vincent Gregoire,et al.  RapidArc, SmartArc and TomoHD compared with classical step and shoot and sliding window intensity modulated radiotherapy in an oropharyngeal cancer treatment plan comparison , 2013, Radiation oncology.

[4]  E. Mok,et al.  Volumetric-Modulated Arc Radiotherapy for Skull-Base and Non-Skull-Base Head and Neck Cancer: A Treatment Planning Comparison with Fixed Beam IMRT , 2013, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[5]  A. Sánchez-Reyes,et al.  Outcome and toxicity using helical tomotherapy for craniospinal irradiation in pediatric medulloblastoma , 2013, Clinical and Translational Oncology.

[6]  K. Herfarth,et al.  Accelerated large volume irradiation with dynamic Jaw/Dynamic Couch Helical Tomotherapy , 2012, Radiation Oncology.

[7]  B. Dobler,et al.  Searching standard parameters for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of prostate cancer , 2012, Radiation oncology.

[8]  Peter Kneschaurek,et al.  A Planning Comparison of Dynamic IMRT for Different Collimator Leaf Thicknesses with Helical Tomotherapy and RapidArc for Prostate and Head and Neck Tumors , 2010, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[9]  A. Schneeweiss,et al.  Intensity-modulated whole abdominal radiotherapy after surgery and carboplatin/taxane chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: phase I study. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Weiguo Lu,et al.  Dynamic jaws and dynamic couch in helical tomotherapy. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Mike Oliver,et al.  Comparing planning time, delivery time and plan quality for IMRT, RapidArc and tomotherapy , 2009, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[12]  C. Ménard,et al.  RTOG GU Radiation oncology specialists reach consensus on pelvic lymph node volumes for high-risk prostate cancer. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  K. Herfarth,et al.  Evaluating target coverage and normal tissue sparing in the adjuvant radiotherapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma: helical tomotherapy compared with step-and-shoot IMRT. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  F. Lohr,et al.  Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with conventional conformal radiotherapy for complex-shaped tumors. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  J O Deasy,et al.  Tomotherapy: a new concept for the delivery of dynamic conformal radiotherapy. , 1993, Medical physics.