The grey escape: How and why are older people really using their free bus pass?

Since 2008 those aged sixty and above have benefitted from unlimited area-wide free travel by bus after 09:30. The official policy rhetoric supporting implementation of the measure drew significantly upon the need to reduce social exclusion amongst older people. However, despite a substantial increase in the number of concessionary journeys in England and the associated cost liabilities for local authorities and possibly also operators, there is currently only limited understanding of the wide-ranging effects of providing a free pass on bus use, and in particular to whom benefits from the policy accrue. In part this circumstance results from a methodological focus by evaluation studies hitherto that has favoured aggregate-level data, often at the expense of the very rich contextual information that helps us understand how the individual benefits from using the pass. With this in mind, this paper seeks to understand more about the effects (both intended and unintended) of providing a free bus pass to older people. The paper specifically explores how pass users currently use the bus and how this has changed since the provision of free area-wide travel, highlighting the existence of both tangible and intangible benefits arising from the way pass holders use the bus. Second, it examines what the data can tell us about the benefits of the pass to the individual, leading to the finding that the nature and extent of benefits can vary between different groups of pass holders. The paper offers a fresh insight into previously unexplored uses and benefits of the concessionary bus pass. The paper concludes by exploring possible policy implications of the research in the context of the UK‟s ageing and growing population.

[1]  Birgitta Gatersleben,et al.  Contemplating Cycling to Work: Attitudes and Perceptions in Different Stages of Change , 2007 .

[2]  J. Parkin,et al.  Barriers to cycling: an exploration of quantitative analyses , 2007 .

[3]  L. Aiken,et al.  Americans report on their access to health care. , 1987, Health affairs.

[4]  Sebastian Ureta,et al.  To Move or Not to Move? Social Exclusion, Accessibility and Daily Mobility among the Low‐income Population in Santiago, Chile , 2008 .

[5]  Katherine M White,et al.  Social influence in the theory of planned behaviour: the role of descriptive, injunctive, and in-group norms. , 2009, The British journal of social psychology.

[6]  Stefano Freguia Trichlorethylene Anaesthesia , 1953 .

[7]  K. Wärneryd The psychology of saving : a study on economic psychology , 1999 .

[8]  Scott A. Fay,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Impact of Nonlinear Shipping and Handling Fees on Purchase Incidence and Expenditure Decisions , 2006 .

[9]  V. Braithwaite,et al.  Adjustment to Retirement: What We Know and What We Need to Know , 1987, Ageing and Society.

[10]  D. Ariely Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions , 2008 .

[11]  A. Bell,et al.  Active Transport to Work in Australia: Is it all downhill from here? , 2006, Asia-Pacific journal of public health.

[12]  Kieran Broome,et al.  Bus use and older people: A literature review applying the Person–Environment–Occupation model in macro practice , 2009, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[13]  S. Costarelli,et al.  The effects of attitudinal ambivalence on pro-environmental behavioural intentions , 2004 .

[14]  J. Hine,et al.  Better for Everyone? Travel Experiences and Transport Exclusion , 2001 .

[15]  Andrew Church,et al.  Transport and social exclusion in London , 1999 .

[16]  T. Rye,et al.  Concessionary fares and bus operator reimbursement in Scotland and Wales: No better or no worse off? , 2008 .

[17]  R. Shields Lifestyle shopping : the subject of consumption , 1992 .

[18]  J. Whitelegg,et al.  Critical mass : transport, environment and society in the twenty-first century , 1997 .

[19]  L. Steg,et al.  Normative, Gain and Hedonic Goal Frames Guiding Environmental Behavior , 2007 .

[20]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Normative Social Influence is Underdetected , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[21]  J. Stutts Do Older Drivers with Visual and Cognitive Impairments Drive Less? , 1998, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[22]  Ram M. Pendyala,et al.  Analysis of the Role of Traveler Attitudes and Perceptions in Explaining Mode-Choice Behavior , 1999 .

[23]  Linda Steg,et al.  Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use , 2005 .

[24]  Richard M. Lee,et al.  The relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, self-esteem, and social identity. , 1998 .

[25]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  When is getting there half the fun? Modeling the liking for travel - eScholarship , 2005 .

[26]  J. Preston,et al.  Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion , 2007 .

[27]  Impacts of free concessionary travel: Case study of an English rural region , 2010 .

[28]  Mônica Sanches Yassuda,et al.  DRIVING CESSATION: THE PERSPECTIVE OF SENIOR DRIVERS , 1997 .

[29]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[30]  T. Lang,et al.  Access to shops: the views of low-income shoppers , 2000 .

[31]  D. Hensher,et al.  The mobility and accessibility expectations of seniors in an aging population , 2003 .

[32]  J. Sallis,et al.  Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[33]  David Metz,et al.  Transport policy for an ageing population , 2003 .