Detection, Analysis, and Removal of Glitches From InSight's Seismic Data From Mars

The instrument package SEIS (Seismic Experiment for Internal Structure) with the three very broadband and three short‐period seismic sensors is installed on the surface on Mars as part of NASA's InSight Discovery mission. When compared to terrestrial installations, SEIS is deployed in a very harsh wind and temperature environment that leads to inevitable degradation of the quality of the recorded data. One ubiquitous artifact in the raw data is an abundance of transient one‐sided pulses often accompanied by high‐frequency spikes. These pulses, which we term “glitches”, can be modeled as the response of the instrument to a step in acceleration, while the spikes can be modeled as the response to a simultaneous step in displacement. We attribute the glitches primarily to SEIS‐internal stress relaxations caused by the large temperature variations to which the instrument is exposed during a Martian day. Only a small fraction of glitches correspond to a motion of the SEIS package as a whole caused by minuscule tilts of either the instrument or the ground. In this study, we focus on the analysis of the glitch+spike phenomenon and present how these signals can be automatically detected and removed from SEIS's raw data. As glitches affect many standard seismological analysis methods such as receiver functions, spectral decomposition and source inversions, we anticipate that studies of the Martian seismicity as well as studies of Mars' internal structure should benefit from deglitched seismic data.

[1]  Raphaël F. Garcia,et al.  The Marsquake catalogue from InSight, sols 0–478 , 2020 .

[2]  Jan ten Pierick,et al.  Companion guide to the marsquake catalog from InSight, Sols 0–478: Data content and non-seismic events , 2020 .

[3]  A. McEwen,et al.  Location and Setting of the Mars InSight Lander, Instruments, and Landing Site , 2020, Earth and space science.

[4]  D. Banfield,et al.  Pressure Effects on the SEIS‐InSight Instrument, Improvement of Seismic Records, and Characterization of Long Period Atmospheric Waves From Ground Displacements , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets.

[5]  D. Banfield,et al.  Subsurface Structure at the InSight Landing Site From Compliance Measurements by Seismic and Meteorological Experiments , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets.

[6]  Roland Martin,et al.  Martian Infrasound: Numerical Modeling and Analysis of InSight's Data , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets.

[7]  C. Russell,et al.  Constraints on the shallow elastic and anelastic structure of Mars from InSight seismic data , 2020, Nature Geoscience.

[8]  Jeroen Tromp,et al.  Initial results from the InSight mission on Mars , 2020, Nature Geoscience.

[9]  David Mimoun,et al.  The atmosphere of Mars as observed by InSight , 2020, Nature Geoscience.

[10]  S. Kedar,et al.  The seismicity of Mars , 2020, Nature Geoscience.

[11]  Ernst Hauber,et al.  Geology of the InSight landing site on Mars , 2020, Nature Communications.

[12]  Huafeng Liu,et al.  SEIS: Insight’s Seismic Experiment for Internal Structure of Mars , 2019, Space Science Reviews.

[13]  D. Leneman,et al.  InSight Auxiliary Payload Sensor Suite (APSS) , 2019, Space Science Reviews.

[14]  P. Lognonné,et al.  High Precision SEIS Calibration for the InSight Mission and Its Applications , 2019, Space Science Reviews.

[15]  B. Banerdt,et al.  The Marsquake Service: Securing Daily Analysis of SEIS Data and Building the Martian Seismicity Catalogue for InSight , 2018, Space Science Reviews.

[16]  Roland Martin,et al.  Atmospheric Science with InSight , 2018, Space Science Reviews.

[17]  Raphaël F. Garcia,et al.  A Numerical Model of the SEIS Leveling System Transfer Matrix and Resonances: Application to SEIS Rotational Seismology and Dynamic Ground Interaction , 2018, Space Science Reviews.

[18]  D. Breuer,et al.  The Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package (HP3) for the InSight Mission , 2018, Space Science Reviews.

[19]  Ralph D. Lorenz,et al.  Modeling of Ground Deformation and Shallow Surface Waves Generated by Martian Dust Devils and Perspectives for Near-Surface Structure Inversion , 2017 .

[20]  David Mimoun,et al.  Estimations of the Seismic Pressure Noise on Mars Determined from Large Eddy Simulations and Demonstration of Pressure Decorrelation Techniques for the Insight Mission , 2017, Space Science Reviews.

[21]  G. Barruol,et al.  Orienting ocean-bottom seismometers from P-wave and Rayleigh wave polarizations , 2017 .

[22]  Seismometer Detection of Dust Devil Vortices by Ground Tilt , 2015, 1511.06580.

[23]  Lion Krischer,et al.  ObsPy: a bridge for seismology into the scientific Python ecosystem , 2015 .

[24]  Jiří Zahradník,et al.  Automated Detection of Long‐Period Disturbances in Seismic Records; MouseTrap Code , 2015 .

[25]  Lion Krischer,et al.  ObsPy: A Python Toolbox for Seismology , 2010 .

[26]  Salvatore Barba,et al.  Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors , 2011 .

[27]  J. Zahradník,et al.  Long-Period Pulses in Broadband Records of Near Earthquakes , 2005 .

[28]  V. Dehant,et al.  Tidally induced surface displacements, external potential variations, and gravity variations on Mars , 2003 .

[29]  M. Allison,et al.  A post-Pathfinder evaluation of areocentric solar coordinates with improved timing recipes for Mars seasonal/diurnal climate studies , 2000 .

[30]  Chia-Yen Peng,et al.  Strong-motion earthquake measurement using a digital accelerograph , 1984 .