Spatial-frequency requirements for reading revisited

Blur is one of many visual factors that can limit reading in both normal and low vision. Legge et al. [Legge, G. E., Pelli, D. G., Rubin, G. S., & Schleske, M. M. (1985). Psychophysics of reading. I. Normal vision. Vision Research, 25, 239-252.] measured reading speed for text that was low-pass filtered with a range of cutoff spatial frequencies. Above 2cycles per letter (CPL) reading speed was constant at its maximum level, but decreased rapidly for lower cutoff frequencies. It remains unknown why the critical cutoff for reading speed is near 2 CPL. The goal of the current study was to ask whether the spatial-frequency requirement for rapid reading is related to the effects of cutoff frequency on letter recognition and the size of the visual span. Visual span profiles were measured by asking subjects to recognize letters in trigrams (random strings of three letters) flashed for 150ms at varying letter positions left and right of the fixation point. Reading speed was measured with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP). The size of the visual span and reading speed were measured for low-pass filtered stimuli with cutoff frequencies from 0.8 to 8 CPL. Low-pass letter recognition data, obtained under similar testing conditions, were available from our previous study (Kwon & Legge, 2011). We found that the spatial-frequency requirement for reading is very similar to the spatial-frequency requirements for the size of the visual span and single letter recognition. The critical cutoff frequencies for reading speed, the size of the visual span and a contrast-invariant measure of letter recognition were all near 1.4 CPL, which is lower than the previous estimate of 2 CPL for reading speed. Although correlational in nature, these results are consistent with the hypothesis that the size of the visual span is closely linked to reading speed.

[1]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition , 2003, Nature.

[2]  GORDON E. LEGGE,et al.  Psychophysics of Reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low- Vision Reading Test , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[3]  G E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. XI. Comparing color contrast and luminance contrast. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  Mustafa.  Abstract , 1952 .

[5]  Sing-Hang Cheung,et al.  The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[6]  G. Legge,et al.  Mr. Chips: an ideal-observer model of reading. , 1997, Psychological review.

[7]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Spatial-frequency cutoff requirements for pattern recognition in central and peripheral vision , 2011, Vision Research.

[8]  Ronald P. Carver,et al.  Word Length, Prose Difficulty, and Reading Ratea , 1976 .

[9]  M. Kwon.  Spatial-frequency bandwidth requirements for pattern vision. , 2010 .

[10]  G. Legge,et al.  Comparing reading speed for horizontal and vertical English text. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[11]  Developmental changes in the visual span for reading , 2007, Vision Research.

[12]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[13]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[14]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[15]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Speed judgments of three-dimensional motion incorporate extraretinal information. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[16]  Tracey D. Berger,et al.  Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[17]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[18]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[19]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—V. The role of contrast in normal vision , 1987, Vision Research.

[20]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[21]  R. Desimone,et al.  Crowding: Including illusory conjunctions, surround suppression, and attention. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[22]  Matthieu Dubois,et al.  Visual span as a sensory bottleneck in learning to read , 2010 .

[23]  G. Legge,et al.  Mr. Chips 2002: new insights from an ideal-observer model of reading , 2002, Vision Research.

[24]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Does print size matter for reading? A review of findings from vision science and typography. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[25]  Sing-Hang Cheung,et al.  Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[26]  G. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—I. Normal vision , 1985, Vision Research.