Expanding our understanding of students' use of graphs for learning physics

EXPANDING OUR UNDERSTANDING OF STUDENTS’ USE OF GRAPHS FOR LEARNING PHYSICS

[1]  Michael Svec.  Improving Graphing Interpretation Skills and Understanding of Motion Using Microcomputer Based Laboratories , 1999 .

[2]  Jeffery M. Saul,et al.  Student expectations in introductory physics , 1998 .

[3]  Herve Gazel.  La sémiologie graphique sort du cadre , 2014 .

[4]  Mark Urban-Lurain,et al.  What Are They Thinking? Automated Analysis of Student Writing about Acid–Base Chemistry in Introductory Biology , 2012, CBE life sciences education.

[5]  E. Silver.  Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing , 1997 .

[6]  Gaea Leinhardt,et al.  Functions, Graphs, and Graphing: Tasks, Learning, and Teaching , 1990 .

[7]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[8]  John J. Clement,et al.  Translation Difficulties in Learning Mathematics , 1981 .

[9]  G. Albertelli,et al.  Individualized interactive exercises: A promising role for network technology , 2001 .

[10]  C M Carswell,et al.  Choosing Specifiers: An Evaluation of the Basic Tasks Model of Graphical Perception , 1992, Human factors.

[11]  Heather Brasell,et al.  The effect of real‐time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity , 1987 .

[12]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  THE EFFECT OF SIMULTANEOUS MOTION PRESENTATION AND GRAPH GENERATION IN A KINEMATICS LAB , 1990 .

[13]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Mary Budd Rowe,et al.  Graphing Skills among High School Physics Students , 1993 .

[15]  V. Mešić,et al.  Identifying Predictors of Physics Item Difficulty: A Linear Regression Approach. , 2011 .

[16]  Herbert Lin.  Learning physics vs. passing courses , 1982 .

[17]  Carmel M. Diezmann,et al.  Solving graphics tasks : gender differences in middle-school students , 2011 .

[18]  John W. Shrum,et al.  The effects of microcomputer‐based laboratory exercises on the acquisition of line graph construction and interpretation skills by high school biology students , 1990 .

[19]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[20]  Howard Wainer,et al.  Understanding Graphs and Tables , 1992 .

[21]  J. Mokros,et al.  The impact of microcomputer‐based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs , 1987 .

[22]  Frances R. Curcio,et al.  Comprehension of Mathematical Relationships Expressed in Graphs. , 1987 .

[23]  Gerd Kortemeyer,et al.  Gender differences in the use of an online homework system in an introductory physics course , 2009 .

[24]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement vs Traditional Methods in Mechanics Instruction* , 1998 .

[25]  G. Henry Veldhuis,et al.  The use of cluster analysis in categorization of physics problems , 1990 .

[26]  B. Bloom.  Taxonomy of educational objectives , 1956 .

[27]  Patricia Hale.  Kinematics and Graphs: Students' Difficulties and CBLs. , 2000 .

[28]  H. Wainer.  A Test of Graphicacy in Children , 1980 .

[29]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Learning motion concepts using real‐time microcomputer‐based laboratory tools , 1990 .

[30]  N. Sanjay Rebello,et al.  Students’ understanding and application of the area under the curve concept in physics problems , 2011 .

[31]  John R. Thompson,et al.  Investigating graphical representations of slope and derivative without a physics context , 2012 .

[32]  David E. Meltzer,et al.  Relation between students’ problem-solving performance and representational format , 2005 .

[33]  Italo Testa,et al.  Students' reading images in kinematics: The case of real-time graphs , 2002 .

[34]  Susan N. Friel,et al.  Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. , 2001 .

[35]  Dewey I. Dykstra,et al.  Conceptual development about motion and force in elementary and middle school students , 2009 .

[36]  Markus Hohenwarter,et al.  Introducing Dynamic Mathematics Software to Secondary School Teachers: the Case of GeoGebra , 2009 .

[37]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[38]  A. V. Heuvelen,et al.  Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research‐based instructional strategies , 1991 .

[39]  Graphical Response Exercises for Teaching Physics , 2007 .

[40]  Katherine K. Perkins,et al.  Students know what physicists believe, but they don’t agree: A study using the CLASS survey , 2008 .

[41]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  MATHEMATICAL TUTORIALS IN INTRODUCTORY PHYSICS , 1997 .

[42]  G. Kortemeyer,et al.  Empirical approach to interpreting card-sorting data , 2012, 1201.6601.

[43]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs , 1994 .

[44]  Gerd Kortemeyer,et al.  Correlations between Student Discussion Behavior, Attitudes, and Learning. , 2007 .

[45]  Eliane Angela Veit,et al.  Physics students' performance using computational modelling activities to improve kinematics graphs interpretation , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[46]  Gerd Kortemeyer.  An analysis of asynchronous online homework discussions in introductory physics courses , 2006 .

[47]  James T. Laverty,et al.  Function plot response: A scalable system for teaching kinematics graphs , 2012 .

[48]  Jose P. Mestre,et al.  Change Blindness as a Means of Studying Expertise in Physics , 2010 .

[49]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics , 1987 .

[50]  P. V. Kampen,et al.  Categorization of first-year university students' interpretations of numerical linear distance-time graphs , 2013 .

[51]  Campbell J. McRobbie,et al.  The Role of the Microcomputer-Based Laboratory Display in Supporting the Construction of New Understandings in Kinematics , 2003 .

[52]  Dean Zollman,et al.  Influence of Interactive Videodisc Instruction Using Simultaneous-Time Analysis on Kinematics Graphing Skills of High School Physics Students. , 1995 .

[53]  G. Kortemeyer,et al.  Experiences using the open-source learning content management and assessment system LON-CAPA in introductory physics courses , 2008 .

[54]  Michael J. Padilla,et al.  An Examination of the Line Graphing Ability of Students in Grades Seven Through Twelve , 1986 .

[55]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  Collaborative robotic instruction: A graph teaching experience , 2009, Comput. Educ..