Reducing societal impacts of SARS-CoV-2 interventions through subnational implementation

To curb the initial spread of SARS-CoV-2, many countries relied on nation-wide implementation of non-pharmaceutical interventions, at a high socio-economic cost. Using the first COVID-19 wave in the Netherlands as a case in point, we address how subnational implementations might have achieved similar levels of epidemiological control with fewer societal consequences; e.g., parts of the country could have stayed open for longer. To this end, we develop a high-resolution analysis framework reflecting a demographically stratified population with a spatially explicit, dynamic, individual contact pattern-based epidemiology, exploiting mobility trends extracted from mobile phone signals and Google mobility. The framework is exportable to other countries and settings, and may be used to develop policies on subnational approach as a better strategic choice for controlling future epidemics.

[1]  A. Haines,et al.  The Lancet Commissions The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic , 2022 .

[2]  B. M. Sundram,et al.  The effects of super spreading events and movement control measures on the COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Gemma A. Williams,et al.  Early health system responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Mediterranean countries: A tale of successes and challenges , 2021, Health policy.

[4]  S. Baral,et al.  Networks of SARS-CoV-2 transmission , 2021, Science.

[5]  B. Singer,et al.  Spatiotemporal pattern of COVID-19 spread in Brazil , 2021, Science.

[6]  Eleanor M. Rees,et al.  Implications of the school-household network structure on SARS-CoV-2 transmission under school reopening strategies in England , 2021, Nature Communications.

[7]  E. Stuart,et al.  Household COVID-19 risk and in-person schooling , 2021, Science.

[8]  L. Coffeng,et al.  Achieving herd immunity against COVID-19 at the country level by the exit strategy of a phased lift of control , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[9]  R. Eggo,et al.  The importance of local context in COVID-19 models , 2021, Nature Computational Science.

[10]  Melis N. Anahtar,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in Boston highlights the impact of superspreading events , 2020, Science.

[11]  M. Majdan,et al.  The impact of population-wide rapid antigen testing on SARS-CoV-2 prevalence in Slovakia , 2020, Science.

[12]  O. Purschke,et al.  The Risk of Indoor Sports and Culture Events for the Transmission of COVID-19 (Restart-19) , 2020, medRxiv.

[13]  C. Tebé,et al.  Transmission of COVID-19 in 282 clusters in Catalonia, Spain: a cohort study , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[14]  Y. Teh,et al.  Inferring the effectiveness of government interventions against COVID-19 , 2020, Science.

[15]  M. van Boven,et al.  Nationwide seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and identification of risk factors in the general population of the Netherlands during the first epidemic wave , 2020, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[16]  W. Press,et al.  Modeling, post COVID-19 , 2020, Science.

[17]  Elizabeth C. Lee,et al.  The engines of SARS-CoV-2 spread , 2020, Science.

[18]  Carl A. B. Pearson,et al.  The effect of travel restrictions on the geographical spread of COVID-19 between large cities in China: a modelling study , 2020, BMC Medicine.

[19]  O. Brady,et al.  Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the COVID-19 epidemic in Brazil , 2020, Nature Human Behaviour.

[20]  C. Mohan,et al.  Epidemiology and transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in two Indian states , 2020, Science.

[21]  Christl A. Donnelly,et al.  The impact of COVID-19 and strategies for mitigation and suppression in low- and middle-income countries , 2020, Science.

[22]  Hannah Fry,et al.  Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[23]  Marco De Nadai,et al.  Mobile phone data for informing public health actions across the COVID-19 pandemic life cycle , 2020, Science Advances.

[24]  Tim D. Spector,et al.  Rapid implementation of mobile technology for real-time epidemiology of COVID-19 , 2020, Science.

[25]  A. Vespignani,et al.  Evolving epidemiology and transmission dynamics of coronavirus disease 2019 outside Hubei province, China: a descriptive and modelling study , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[26]  S. Mallapaty How sewage could reveal true scale of coronavirus outbreak , 2020, Nature.

[27]  N. G. Davies,et al.  Age-dependent effects in the transmission and control of COVID-19 epidemics , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[28]  Lucie Abeler-Dörner,et al.  Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing , 2020, Science.

[29]  Jing Zhao,et al.  Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  Mark Jit,et al.  Projecting social contact matrices in 152 countries using contact surveys and demographic data , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  王丹,et al.  Plos Computational Biology主编关于论文获得发表的10条简单法则的评析 , 2009 .

[32]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  Social Contacts and Mixing Patterns Relevant to the Spread of Infectious Diseases , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[33]  P. E. Kopp,et al.  Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence , 2005, Nature.