Individual Driving Behaviour in Wildfire Smoke

This work presents the results of a virtual reality (VR) experiment aiming at investigating how individual driving behaviour is affected by the presence of wildfire smoke. The experiment included a driving simulation task to study the chosen driving speed at different smoke densities and the lateral position of the driven car on the road cross section. During the VR experiment, participants were presented with a simulated wildfire evacuation scenario including the presence of smoke through a head mounted display and were given a task to evacuate via car using a steering wheel and pedals on a single carriageway road with two lanes. A total of 46 participants took part in the experiments and their driven trajectories along with their instantaneous speed were collected in 5 different visibility conditions. Driving speed decreased with increasing smoke density. No difference in choice of speed was found in relation to the smoke density in the previously driven road segment (in thicker or thinner smoke). No difference in lateral position (closer to or further from the centreline of the road) at different smoke densities was found. Suggested correlations between driving speed and wildfire smoke density are provided in this paper, referring to either a fractional reduction of the speed in smoke-free conditions or an absolute choice of speed at a given visibility condition. These correlations are useful to provide more accurate estimation of evacuation times with traffic evacuation modelling tools in case of wildfire and wildland-urban interface fire scenarios.

[1]  Michael Kinsey,et al.  Cognitive Biases Within Decision Making During Fire Evacuations , 2019 .

[2]  Ali Tohidi,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Modeling of Wildfire Spread via Fire Spotting , 2016 .

[3]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  A tunnel evacuation experiment on movement speed and exit choice in smoke , 2017 .

[4]  Thomas J Triggs,et al.  Driving simulator validation for speed research. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Lana M Trick,et al.  Driving in fog: the effects of driving experience and visibility on speed compensation and hazard avoidance. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  A review on travel behaviour modelling in dynamic traffic simulation models for evacuations , 2012 .

[7]  R. Snowden,et al.  Speed perception fogs up as visibility drops , 1998, Nature.

[8]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  Representation of the Impact of Smoke on Agent Walking Speeds in Evacuation Models , 2013 .

[9]  Brenda Philips,et al.  Tornadoes, Social Science, and the False Alarm Effect , 2015 .

[10]  Monica Bordegoni,et al.  Collection and comparison of driver/passenger physiologic and behavioural data in simulation and on-road driving , 2017, 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS).

[11]  Penny Baillie-de Byl.  Holistic Game Development with Unity: An All-in-One Guide to Implementing Game Mechanics, Art, Design and Programming , 2017 .

[12]  Kimberley Opie,et al.  Surviving bushfire: the role of shelters and sheltering practices during the Black Saturday bushfires , 2018 .

[13]  S. Cutter,et al.  Crying wolf: Repeat responses to hurricane evacuation orders , 1998 .

[14]  S. Breznitz.  Cry Wolf: The Psychology of False Alarms , 1984 .

[15]  Brooke Fisher Liu,et al.  Cry Wolf Effect? Evaluating the Impact of False Alarms on Public Responses to Tornado Alerts in the Southeastern United States , 2019, Weather, Climate, and Society.

[16]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  The representation of evacuation movement in smoke-filled underground transportation systems , 2019 .

[17]  Myounghoon Jeon,et al.  Effects of specific emotions on subjective judgment, driving performance, and perceived workload , 2014 .

[18]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  Traffic Modeling for Wildland–Urban Interface Fire Evacuation , 2019, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems.

[19]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  Virtual reality for fire evacuation research , 2014, 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems.

[20]  G McGwin,et al.  Characteristics of traffic crashes among young, middle-aged, and older drivers. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Julie Hatfield,et al.  The role of risk-propensity in the risky driving of younger drivers. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Zhongxiang Feng,et al.  Investigating factors influencing drivers' speed selection behavior under reduced visibility conditions , 2018, Traffic injury prevention.

[23]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  The cry wolf effect in evacuation: A game-theoretic approach , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[24]  Michael Kinsey,et al.  Correction to: Cognitive Biases Within Decision Making During Fire Evacuations , 2019 .

[25]  Susan Joslyn,et al.  The Cry Wolf Effect and Weather‐Related Decision Making , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[26]  T. Jin,et al.  Experimental Study On Effect Of Escape Guidance In Fire Smoke By Travelling Flashing Of Light Sources , 1994 .

[27]  Diane E. Gyi,et al.  Exploring the optimum posture for driver comfort , 2014 .

[28]  Ruggiero Lovreglio,et al.  A modelling framework for householder decision-making for wildfire emergencies , 2019 .

[29]  Kevin R Brooks,et al.  Simulation of Driving in Low-Visibility Conditions: Does Stereopsis Improve Speed Perception? , 2015, Perception.

[30]  Paul M. Salmon,et al.  Systematic review of driving simulator validation studies , 2019, Safety Science.

[31]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  An open multi-physics framework for modelling wildland-urban interface fire evacuations , 2019, Safety Science.

[32]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  e-Sanctuary: Open Multi-Physics Framework for Modelling Wildfire Urban Evacuation , 2017 .

[33]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  Pedestrian Movement in Smoke: Theory, Data and Modelling Approaches , 2018 .

[34]  Nobuyoshi Kawabata,et al.  Experiments of evacuation speed in smoke-filled tunnel , 2016 .

[35]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  Mobile‐powered head‐mounted displays versus cave automatic virtual environment experiments for evacuation research , 2019, Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds.

[36]  Sarah McCaffrey,et al.  Should I Stay or Should I Go Now? Or Should I Wait and See? Influences on Wildfire Evacuation Decisions , 2018, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[37]  Leo Laine,et al.  The influence of steering wheel size when tuning power assistance , 2014 .

[38]  Jim McLennan,et al.  Should We Leave Now? Behavioral Factors in Evacuation Under Wildfire Threat , 2018, Fire Technology.

[39]  Erica D. Kuligowski,et al.  A Provisional Conceptual Model of Human Behavior in Response to Wildland-Urban Interface Fires , 2019, Fire Technology.