Effect of time delays on agents' interaction dynamics

While speaking about social interaction, psychology claims as crucial the temporal correlations between interactants' behaviors: to give to their partners a feeling of natural interaction, interactants, be human, robotic or virtual, must be able to react on appropriate time. Recent approaches consider autonomous agents as dynamical systems and the interaction as a coupling between these systems. These approaches solve the issue of time handling and enable to model synchronization and turn-taking as phenomenon emerging with the coupling. But when complex computations are added to their architecture, such as processing of video and audio signals, delays appear within the interaction loop and disrupt this coupling. We model here a dyad of agents where processing delays are controlled. These agents, driven by oscillators, synchronize and take turns when there is no delay. We describe the methodology enabling to evaluate the synchrony and turn-taking emergence. We test oscillators coupling properties when there is no delay: coupling occurs if coupling strength is inferior to the parameter controlling oscillators natural period and if the ratio between oscillators periods is inferior to 1/2. We quantify the maximal delays between agents which do not disrupt the interaction: the maximal delay tolerated by agents is proportional to the natural period of the coupled system and to the strength of the coupling. These results are put in perspective with the different time constraints of human-human and human-agent interactions.

[1]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. , 2007, Human movement science.

[2]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Transformed Social Interaction: Decoupling Representation from Behavior and Form in Collaborative Virtual Environments , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[3]  Dennis Gabor,et al.  Theory of communication , 1946 .

[4]  Collins.  Collins English Dictionary Complete & Unabridged , 2004 .

[5]  W. S. Condon,et al.  SOUND FILM ANALYSIS OF NORMAL AND PATHOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR PATTERNS , 1966, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[6]  Elisabetta Bevacqua.  Positive influence of smile backchannels in ECAs , 2010 .

[7]  Kurths,et al.  Phase synchronization of chaotic oscillators. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[8]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[9]  Philippe Gaussier,et al.  Avoiding the world model trap: An acting robot does not need to be so smart! , 1994 .

[10]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Phil Husbands,et al.  Evolutionary robotics , 2014, Evolutionary Intelligence.

[12]  Ming-Chung Ho,et al.  Phase and anti-phase synchronization of two chaotic systems by using active control , 2002 .

[13]  M. Rohde,et al.  Sensitivity to social contingency or stability of interaction? Modelling the dynamics of perceptual crossing , 2008 .

[14]  Catherine Pelachaud,et al.  Shared Understanding and Synchrony Emergence - Synchrony as an Indice of the Exchange of Meaning between Dialog Partners , 2011, ICAART.

[15]  J. Kelso,et al.  From the Cover : The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination , 2007 .

[16]  M. Auvray,et al.  Perceptual interactions in a minimalist virtual environment , 2009 .

[17]  Roddy Cowie,et al.  Detecting Politeness and efficiency in a cooperative social interaction , 2010, INTERSPEECH.

[18]  S Kuriki,et al.  Motor planning center for speech articulation in the normal human brain. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[19]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Evolutionary Robotics: The Biology, Intelligence, and Technology of Self-Organizing Machines , 2000 .

[20]  T Shipp,et al.  Minimal reaction times for phonatory initiation. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[21]  J. Kurths,et al.  From Phase to Lag Synchronization in Coupled Chaotic Oscillators , 1997 .

[22]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  EMA: A process model of appraisal dynamics , 2009, Cognitive Systems Research.

[23]  Ken Prepin,et al.  Human–machine interaction as a model of machine–machine interaction: how to make machines interact as humans do , 2007, Adv. Robotics.

[24]  Young-Jai Park,et al.  Anti-synchronization of chaotic oscillators , 2003 .

[25]  Michael J Richardson,et al.  Period Basin of Entrainment for Unintentional Visual Coordination , 2008, Journal of motor behavior.

[26]  J. Pineda.  The functional significance of mu rhythms: Translating “seeing” and “hearing” into “doing” , 2005, Brain Research Reviews.

[27]  Instructions concerning the use of pendulum-watches, for finding the longitude at sea , 1669, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[28]  E. D. Di Paolo.  Behavioral Coordination, Structural Congruence and Entrainment in a Simulation of Acoustically Coupled Agents , 2000 .

[29]  Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al.  Learning Smooth, Human-Like Turntaking in Realtime Dialogue , 2008, IVA.

[30]  Hiroyuki Iizuka,et al.  Adaptive Coupling and Intersubjectivity in Simulated Turn-Taking Behaviour , 2003, ECAL.

[31]  Yoshiki Kuramoto,et al.  Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence , 1984, Springer Series in Synergetics.

[32]  Olivier Oullier,et al.  Social Coordination, from the Perspective of Coordination Dynamics , 2009, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[33]  Carroll,et al.  Synchronization in chaotic systems. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[34]  Philippe Gaussier,et al.  Neural networks for complex scene recognition: simulation of a visual system with several cortical areas , 1992, [Proceedings 1992] IJCNN International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[35]  J. Kelso,et al.  Social coordination dynamics: Measuring human bonding , 2008, Social neuroscience.

[36]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Contextual recognition of head gestures , 2005, ICMI '05.

[37]  William S. Condon,et al.  An Analysis of Behavioral Organization , 2013 .

[38]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences , 2001, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series.

[39]  J. Kurths,et al.  Automatic control of phase synchronization in coupled complex oscillators , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 International Conference Physics and Control, 2005..

[40]  Joakim Nivre,et al.  On the Semantics and Pragmatics of Linguistic Feedback , 1992, J. Semant..

[41]  V. Yngve.  On getting a word in edgewise , 1970 .

[42]  Catherine Pelachaud,et al.  Modelling multimodal expression of emotion in a virtual agent , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  Claire Hughes,et al.  Early Social Cognition , 2010 .

[44]  J. Nadel,et al.  The evolving nature of imitation as a format for communication. , 1999 .

[45]  Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al.  A Multiparty Multimodal Architecture for Realtime Turntaking , 2010, IVA.

[46]  Line Garnero,et al.  Inter-Brain Synchronization during Social Interaction , 2010, PloS one.